4 Republican senators push FCC to act on Trump's social media 'censorship' order
Letter asks for review of rule protecting social media companies
Four Republican senators followed up on President Trump’s executive order last month by asking the Federal Communication Commission to review a rule that protects social media companies’ First Amendment rights.
Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., Kevin Cramer, R.-ND, and Josh Hawley, R-Mo., accused social media companies of attempting to silence political speech and critics of the Chinese Communist Party in a letter to FCC Chair Ajit Pai.
Trump has also called on the FCC and Federal Trade Commission to see whether they could put new regulations on social media platforms in his “Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship,” which came after Twitter added fact checks to two of his tweets with unsubstantiated claims about mail-in ballots.
Trump Twitter fact-check label / FBN
TWITTER ADDS FACT-CHECK WARNINGS TO TRUMP’S TWEETS
Social media companies are treated as platforms, not publishers, under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The distinction provides the social media companies with legal protection over content that users post. And courts have ruled that the platforms have a First Amendment right to promote or remove users’ content at their own discretion.
But Trump and some conservatives have accused social media platforms like Twitter of censorship over various incidents the companies said violated their terms of use. And while Trump has feuded the most with Twitter, a rule change would likely also affect companies like Facebook, Google and other online publishing platforms.
| Ticker | Security | Last | Change | Change % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWTR | NO DATA AVAILABLE | - | - | - |
| FB | NO DATA AVAILABLE | - | - | - |
| GOOGL | ALPHABET INC. | 171.49 | +2.54 | +1.50% |
FACEBOOK, TWITTER, GOOGLE TO REPORT MONTHLY ON FAKE NEWS FIGHT: EU
“Social media companies have become involved in a range of editorial and promotional activity; like publishers, they monetize, edit, and otherwise editorialize user content,” the senators wrote. “It is time to take a fresh look at Section 230 and to interpret the vague standard of ‘good faith’ with specific guidelines and direction.”
Some First Amendment advocates and internet industry leaders have criticized the president’s executive order. In a blog post, the Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote that the order was “likely unconstitutional on several grounds, built on false premises and bad policy to boot.”
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
Pai previously said in a statement that the FCC would review any petition for rulemaking filed by the Department of Commerce.
“This debate is an important one,” he said.
READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS BY CLICKING HERE