The survey aimed to examine a 155-mile stretch of coastline in Eastern Cape Province. The seismic blasting process involves firing high-powered air guns every 10 seconds and measuring the echoes to detect cavities under the sea bed.
|RDS.A||ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC||50.82||-0.13||-0.26%|
|XOM||EXXON MOBIL CORP.||73.11||+0.03||+0.04%|
High Court Judge Gerald Bloem said Shell initially earned the right to explore the waters based on "a substantially flawed consultation process," the BBC reported.
"This case is really a culmination of the struggle of communities along the Wild Coast for the recognition of their customary rights to land and fishing, and to respect for their customary processes," Wilmien Wicomb, attorney at the Legal Resource Center, said.
Wicomb hailed the verdict as one of "huge significance."
Shell’s approval for the project may have resulted from an outdated legislation, since it derived from Shell receiving the green light in 2014 just months before the legislation changed, according to The Guardian.
A different high court on Dec. 3 decided in Shell’s favor, but the new ruling contends that Shell did not have the necessary environmental approvals.
Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe claimed that critics to Shell’s project wanted to deprive Africa of energy resources, but environmentalists worried that the project – which would involve blasting parts of the coast – would disturb sea life, which includes whales, dolphins and seals.
"Could it be possible that this is an extreme pure love for the environment, or an unrelenting campaign to ensure Africa and South Africa do not see the investment inflows they need?"
A Shell spokesperson told Reuters that the company will "respect the court’s decision and have paused the survey while we review the judgement."