President of largest Christian university in US responds to FTC lawsuit

Grand Canyon University President Brian Mueller says FTC allegations are 'height of absurdity'

Grand Canyon University (GCU) President Brian Mueller says the allegations made in the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) lawsuit against the school this week are "the height of absurdity" and further proof of what he says are coordinated and targeted actions being taken by the federal government against the institution.

The FTC on Wednesday announced that the agency is suing GCU, its marketer Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (GCE), and Mueller personally, claiming the defendants deceptively marketed the school as a nonprofit, misled prospective students about costs and engaged in illegal telemarketing.

Brian Mueller GCU

Grand Canyon University President Brian Mueller told FOX News Digital in October that the school is being targeted by the Department of Education. (Fox News / Fox News)

Mueller said in a lengthy statement Thursday that the fact that the FTC is taking issue with GCU, the largest Christian university in the U.S., identifying itself as a non-profit entity during an 18-month window after the school transitioned to become a non-profit in 2018 is "nonsensical."

"That transaction was blessed by the IRS, State of Arizona and our accrediting body (Higher Learning Commission), so of course we identified ourselves as a nonprofit because we were… and are," Mueller said. 

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S TITLE IX PROPOSAL RECEIVES STARK WARNING FROM UN EXPERT: ‘DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS’

"The U.S. Department of Education waited 18 months after the transaction to announce it would not recognize our lawful nonprofit status for the purposes of Title IV funding and demanded at that time that, moving forward, GCU not identify itself as a nonprofit institution based on unsupported speculation that students would confuse GCU’s legal nonprofit status with the Department’s so-called ‘Title IV for-profit status.’ We disagreed with that opinion but cooperated as a good faith gesture," he argued.

Federal Trade Commission chair Lina Khan

Lina Khan, chair of the Federal Trade Commission, speaks during a House Appropriation Subcommittee hearing in Washington, D.C., on May 18, 2022.  (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

"For the FTC to say now, five years later, that identifying ourselves as a nonprofit institution during that 18-month window was somehow ‘deceptive advertising’ is meritless and the height of absurdity," he continued.

Meuller also denies the FTC's claims that GCE engaged in "abusive marketing calls" to prospective students.

JUDGE JEANINE: WHY ARE GRADS REFUSING TO PAY BACK THEIR LOANS?

"GCE does not make cold calls to prospective students on behalf of GCU. It only reaches out to those who have inquired about GCU’s programs or otherwise expressed interest in attending the university," Mueller said. "That practice is common among higher education institutions and other entities, yet GCU is being singled out in a blatant example of selective enforcement by this federal agency."

The GCU president said other FTC allegations related to doctoral disclosures and the university's relationship with its service provider are "the same baseless claims" made by the Department of Education, which fined the school $37.7 million in October.

FSA Investigation

According to a U.S. Department of Education press release, an investigation conducted by the office of Federal Student Aid found that GCU "lied" to over 7,500 former and current students about the cost of its doctoral programs over several years. Pic (REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein / Reuters Photos)

"I won’t spend time refuting those since we have already done so," Mueller said. "But the fact that the FTC is using the same accusations as the Department of Education makes it clear that the two agencies are coordinating efforts and suggests that the FTC’s real goal is to further burden GCU by forcing it to defend against duplicative lawsuits."

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

He added, "Sadly, there are no checks and balances in place to prevent this type of blatant and unwarranted government overreach."