Cigna, Anthem won't have to pay damages over failed merger, judge decides

Cigna Corp. and Anthem Inc. won’t have to pay damages to one another over their failed $48 billion merger deal, a Delaware judge decided Monday, potentially resolving a bitter, yearslong legal battle that had the two insurance giants trading accusations of skulduggery.

Continue Reading Below

In dueling lawsuits, each of the health-insurance giants sought billions of dollars in damages from the other. Both companies argued that its erstwhile partner had sabotaged their proposed combination, which foundered in 2017 after court rulings against the merger on antitrust grounds. Cigna wanted damages of $14.7 billion, along with a breakup fee of about $1.8 billion, from Anthem. Anthem sought damages of $21.1 billion from Cigna.


Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster, of the Delaware Chancery Court, wrote that Anthem had sought to complete the merger and “chose a sound strategy and took all of the actions necessary and appropriate to pursue it.” Cigna, he said, had breached its obligation to try to consummate the deal: “Rather than seeking to complete the Merger, Cigna sought to derail it,” he wrote.

Calling the drama a “corporate soap opera,” Judge Laster attached blame to both sides. Cigna proved that it was likely that the deal would have been blocked regardless of its actions, he wrote. In the end, “each party must bear the losses it suffered as a result of their star-crossed venture.”

Pedestrians walk passed signage at Cigna Corp. headquarters in Bloomfield, Connecticut, U.S., on Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2016. Anthem Inc.'s proposed $48 billion merger with Cigna Corp. could give the insurer the power to raise prices for employers both in

Shares in Cigna fell 2.1% on the New York Stock Exchange, while shares in Anthem rose 1.5%.

Stocks in this Article

+1.19 (+0.45%)
-1.08 (-0.64%)

Investors had largely discounted the likelihood of sizable damage awards in the litigation, but some believed Cigna might still get the breakup fee, which the judge didn’t uphold, said Matthew Borsch, an analyst with BMO Capital Markets. “That was a little bit of a positive surprise for Anthem investors, and a little bit of a negative surprise for Cigna investors,” he said.

In a written statement, a spokeswoman for Cigna said the company is “pleased that the Court agreed with us that Cigna did not cause the merger to fail.” The company still believes in its case and is “evaluating our options with respect to appeal,” she said.


A spokeswoman for Anthem said the insurer is “satisfied with the decision determining that Cigna breached its obligation to use best efforts to obtain regulatory approval for the merger,” and forfeited the breakup fee.

Click for more at