Why won't New York's leaders share the data on restaurants and COVID-19?
New York City’s restaurants have bent over backward, forward, sideways and in between just to stay open at 25 percent capacity
If you’ve dined indoors at a New York City restaurant over the past few months, you know the routine: You must fill in contact information on a form. That way, if someone tests positive for COVID-19, contact tracers can identify others who’ve eaten at the same restaurants and alert them that they may have been exposed.
Surely the tracers must know which restaurants, if any, have had many of its patrons infected. So why is New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo now threatening to ban all indoor dining, and put in other new restrictions, as COVID infections and hospitalizations rise, rather than focus only on eateries with a bad record?
And, by the way, are restaurants really even a vector of the spread? What, New Yorkers want to know, do the data say?
WALGREENS, CVS HIRING THOUSANDS OF WORKERS TO HELP WITH VACCINE DISTRIBUTION
The answer: We have no idea. Yes, you read that right.
This vital information — about the dangerousness of an industry that employs thousands of our citizens — has not been released. And not because no one’s asked for it: Staten Island City Councilman Joe Borelli, who increasingly seems like one of the last rational elected officials in the city, has tried and failed to obtain it, as have Rep.-elect Nicole Malliotakis and Council Minority Leader Steve Matteo.
CALIFORNIA COFFEE SHOP OWNER DEFIES CORONAVIRUS RESTRICTIONS WITH 'PEACEFUL PROTEST'
“Data from the contact trace corps was what we were told we needed to reopen. Now that we have no data to target sources of spread, despite having thousands of contact tracers . . . it’s unclear why they are just reverting to their default lockdown,” Borelli says.
What the hell is going on? Where are the data? How dangerous are the restaurants?
There are a few plausible explanations here. First, based on the Occam’s razor principle, is the possibility of pure incompetence, always a driver of city government.
Maybe the data simply aren’t being gathered and the program’s money is being wasted. The more nefarious possibility, and one we must hope is not the case, is that the data do exist but are so underwhelming that it would make restrictions on indoor dining seem absurd. The latter would be an inexcusable abuse of power.
New York City’s restaurants have bent over backward, forward, sideways and in between just to stay open at 25 percent capacity. While “Saturday Night Live” is filmed in front of a live audience, with Staten Island’s Pete Davidson insulting his own borough’s dissenters without wearing a mask, our restaurants — almost literally the city’s bread and butter — have been crushed and left begging for crumbs. Pete seems to be doing OK; I want to know why our restaurants can’t be full.
And I want to know now.
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
If talentless clowns who couldn’t get a laugh in a tickle fight can gallivant indoors, why can’t New Yorkers fill a room for a good steak?
New York City’s restaurants have bent over backward, forward, sideways and in between just to stay open at 25 percent capacity. While “Saturday Night Live” is filmed in front of a live audience, with Staten Island’s Pete Davidson insulting his own borough’s dissenters without wearing a mask, our restaurants — almost literally the city’s bread and butter — have been crushed and left begging for crumbs.
Pete seems to be doing OK; I want to know why our restaurants can’t be full.
And I want to know now.
If talentless clowns who couldn’t get a laugh in a tickle fight can gallivant indoors, why can’t New Yorkers fill a room for a good steak?
David Marcus is The Federalist’s New York correspondent.