Investing in large, stable companies helps us to sleep easier at night. I know that on a visceral level, as my top three holdings -- all companies valued at over $450 billion -- account for 40% of my real-life portfolio. And I don't miss a wink of rest worrying about them.
But is that ease misplaced? Should I be concerned about the dangers lurking in the shadows?
Continue Reading Below
Perhaps, says Nassim Nicholas Taleb, former trader, current professor of risk engineering at NYU, and best-selling author of Fooled by Randomness, The Black Swan, Antifragile, and the just-released Skin in the Game. I recently had a chance to sit down with Taleb and discuss a wide-range of topics, including his preference for small-cap over large-cap stocks.
When asked if small cap stocks were more antifragile than large cap stocks
To put this in context, something that is "fragile" can be defined by that which will likely suffer over time when exposed to stressors, chaos, and volatility. Because Google -- in this case -- already has so much of the market, stressors and volatility are more likely to cause harm than good.
"Antifragility" on the other hand, is a characteristic of things which actually stand to benefit from the same forces of stress, chaos, and volatility. Small cap stocks, because they have so much potential upside and are often more nimble than industry goliaths, have more potential to benefit from these forces by learning and adapting quickly.
On the dynamics behind small-cap investing vs. large-cap investing
When Taleb talks about "skewed" returns, it helps to imagine charts like the one below.
The important thing is to pay attention to the "tails" of the chart. In the negatively skewed chart, you see that there's a lot to lose if your returns fall in the left side of the chart, but not as much to gain on the right side. The opposite is true in the positively skewed chart.
Taleb continues, saying:
There's a well-known meme that has been making the rounds on Twitter that can help us understand why S&P 500 companies today aren't lasting in the index as long as they used to. It looks like this:
The thinking that underlies that meme is simple: The pace of technological innovation is accelerating. Because of that, today's incumbents are weaker than their predecessors, and more likely to be overtaken by disruptive upstarts. One look at the fates of Blockbuster and Sears should be enough to understand the point.
On the need to diversify across many small-cap picks
While I'm not a statistical expert, what I think Taleb is pointing out is that if you're a small-cap investor, casting a wide net for high-quality small caps is very important. In that respect, it's not all that different than being a venture-capital investor: 90% of your investments may end up going bust, but one or two will do so well -- assuming you end up holding them over time -- that they'll more than make up for any losses.
That's why we here at The Motley Fool encourage a diversified portfolio.
Taleb and I didn't get into the specifics of how to select small-cap stocks, but if you're looking to start investing in small caps yourself, a few key attributes I -- personally -- focus on include:
- Selecting a company where management has lots of skin in the game -- via stock ownership -- and is preferably run by its founder.
- Has an easily identifiable moat.
- Strong balance sheet devoid of unnecessary leverage.
- Does not rely on one or two customers for a bulk of revenue.
As legendary member and contributor to Motley Fool Supernova Tom Engle (TMF1000) has often said:
"If the investment goes bust, a small allocation is all I want. If an investment ends up being a big winner, a small allocation is all I need."
I couldn't have said it better myself.
10 stocks we like better than WalmartWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, the Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now… and Walmart wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
Click here to learn about these picks!
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 2, 2018The author(s) may have a position in any stocks mentioned.
John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Brian Stoffel owns shares of Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Tencent Holdings, and Twitter. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Tencent Holdings, and Twitter. The Motley Fool has the following options: long January 2020 $150 calls on Apple and short January 2020 $155 calls on Apple. The Motley Fool recommends Match Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.