There were plenty of signs that this was coming. Earlier this week, Microsoft dropped a mobile bomb. In a troubling but inevitable concession, Microsoft confirmed that it will lay off 7,800 unlucky workers, most of whom are in the phone hardware business that the software giant paid so handsomely for.
At the same time, the company will be taking a massive $7.6 billion impairment charge related to the acquisition of Nokia's handset business. That's on top of another $750 million to $850 million in restructuring charges that Microsoft will incur. Ouch.
How committed is Nadella really?The news comes just over a year after Microsoft closed the deal in April 2014. Just a few months later, CEO Satya Nadella outlined a broad organizational restructuring that would entail cutting 18,000 jobs. Of those, 12,500 were within the phone business that Microsoft had just bought. This latest round now brings phone-related layoffs up to 20,300. It also represents almost 7% of Microsoft's total workforce, which stood at 118,000 employees at the end of March.
Yet even after axing all those positions, Nadella says he remains "committed" to first-party phones. Here's how he put it in his letter to employees:
The distinction seems a bit semantic, but it sounds as if Microsoft doesn't want to spearhead the hardware efforts for Windows 10 Mobile devices anymore. Instead, it wants to focus on the broader ecosystem, which just so happens to include first-party devices.
That was quickWhen Nadella shook up his executive ranks last month, ousting former Nokia CEO (and more recently, Microsoft devices exec) Stephen Elop in the process, it was a clear sign that Microsoft was having doubts about its phone hardware business. Besides, Microsoft explicitly braced investors for an imminent writedown in April, when it filed its 10-Q with this ominous language (emphasis added):
There was a grand total of $10 billion in goodwill and intangible assets associated with the deal, and the impairment will wipe out the majority of that sum.
The phone hardware business was doing terriblyMicrosoft's move into the phone hardware business was always a head-scratcher. Why did Microsoft want to enter the intensely competitive market for phone hardware? There was virtually no way Microsoft could pull off a vertically integrated strategy in the way Apple has. Microsoft was built by commoditizing hardware partners through standardized software, so it should have been intimately aware of the consequences.
Here are the financial results that the phone hardware business put up during the four quarters reported since the deal closed.
Source: SEC filings. Calendar quarters shown.
Microsoft lost "just" $4 million in gross profit last quarter on phone hardware, but that's before factoring in operating expenses. Well, cutting nearly all of the segment's employees should help reduce operating expenses.
Nadella has never been too thrilled about the phone hardware business. After all, it was his predecessor that put the deal together and threw a temper tantrum about it to boot. In fact, Steve Ballmer, never one to be subtle, screamed at the board to let him go through with the deal. The episode was part of what sealed Ballmer's fate and paved the way for Nadella's promotion. Nadella just inherited the mess.
While Microsoft is taking a major step back from phones, I just so happen to know of a company that's interested in designing them again that Microsoft could potentially partner with: Nokia.
The article Don't Say Microsoft Corporation Didn't Warn You originally appeared on Fool.com.
Evan Niu, CFA owns shares of Apple. The Motley Fool both recommends and owns shares of Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright 1995 - 2015 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.