4 Reasons I Would Not Buy Qorvo Stock

By Frank DiPietroMarketsFool.com

As investments go,Qorvo Inc. (NASDAQ: QRVO) is not my cup of tea. The company has numerous characteristics that are not appealing to my investment style and leads me to believe there are better places to invest.

Continue Reading Below

Here are four factors that make me reluctant to invest in Qorvo.

  1. The company has a collection of expensive assets that do not appear well planned out.
  2. Pricing power has not been demonstrated.
  3. This is not a simple business model.
  4. It's unclear whether the company can afford to adjust to technology disruption.

Let's put Qorvo under the microscope and examine these factors more closely.

More From Fool.com

Image source: Getty Images.

Where does Qorvo come from?

Qorvo came into being on Jan. 1, 2015, when RF Micro Devices (RFMD) merged with Triquint Semiconductor. Prior to merging, each of these companies had made numerous acquisitions and mergers. Below is a table showing different entities acquired by the companies in question.

Year Triquint Semiconductor RF Micro Devices Qorvo
1991 Gazelle Microcircuits
1991 Gigabit Logic
2001 Sawtek
2002 Infineon's gallium aresenide business
2005 TFR Technologies
2007 Peak Devices Inc. Sirenza Microdevices
2012 Amalfi Semiconductor
2016 GreenPeak Technologies

Data source: Qorvo.

Aside from the history lesson, the important takeaway is that Qorvo consists of the remnants of at least 11 different semiconductor companies along with land, buildings, property, and equipment.

Many acquisitions lead to challenges

Qorvo's business is rooted in analog semiconductors. These devices, unlike digital semiconductors, are typically fabricated in a company's own foundry. A semiconductor foundry is a very expensive asset that requires continual upkeep to stay competitive. If a company does not have the ability to raise prices, it's very difficult to be consistently profitable due to the high operating cost and capital expenditures to keep the foundry running.

Because of how it came into being, Qorvo has many foundries that were brought into the company over time. It was not set up as one company to operate efficiently as much as it has become a collection of assets.

Location Foundry
Greensboro, N.C. Company-owned
Hillsboro, Ore. Company-owned
Richardson, Texas Company-owned
Apopka, Fla. Company-owned
Bend, Ore. Leased
Farmers Branch, Texas Company-owned

Data source: Qorvo.

The company lacks pricing power

Below is a chart illustrating two problems that Qorvo has. The company's quarterly gross profit margin is rarely above 40%, which is an indication it has little pricing power. Its operating margin tends to be below 5%, which demonstrates how costly it is to run all these manufacturing sites. A company that has high operating costs and cannot raise its prices to offset those costs is trapped in a very difficult business model.

QRVO Gross Profit Margin (Quarterly) data by YCharts.

Is this a simple business?

Managing this collection of assets must be quite a challenge. An item that caught my attention displays the complexity of the business. It is management's explanation of GAAP (unadjusted) vs. non-GAAP (adjusted) accounting. The third-quarter earnings press release has no less than 15 paragraphs devoted to this topic.

Here is an example of what management says in the report:

When I see a company that is comprised of multiple acquisitions state that it wants investors to ignore restructuring and disposal costs, acquisition and integration costs, intellectual property rights litigation costs, and start-up costs, I lose interest quickly. These costs can be cash expenses, so I do not ignore them and prefer to stick with the GAAP disclosures.

In the company's FY 2016 annual report, for instance, the company noted integration costs of $26.5 million and restructuring costs of $10.1 million (including stock-based compensation) associated with the combination of TriQuint and RF. It also noted $14.1 million in start-up costs "related to new processes and operations in both existing and new facilities." In the previous fiscal year, the company noted other operating expenses included acquisition costs of $12.2 million, integration costs of $31.3 million, and restructuring costs of $10.9 million associated with the merger.

Will this company be around in 10 years?

If technology changes, Qorvo has a tremendous number of assets that will need to change. In its quarterly report for the period ending Dec. 31, 2016, the company stated it had spent $387 million in the past nine months on the purchase of property and equipment.

It is difficult to predict how much it will have to spend to keep up with the needs of the industry. Whatever it needs to spend may require the company to borrow money. In November 2015, the company took out two loans in the form of long-term bonds. The table below shows the duration and interest rates of the notes. These interest payments are an additional drag on the company's profitability.

Amount of Loan Interest Rate Due Date
$450 million 6.75% 2023
$550 million 7.00% 2025

Data source: Qorvo.

I simply cannot predict whether this company will be able to keep up under the financial burden of the cost of operating its business and the lack of strong pricing power with its customers.


When I look at Qorvo's history and what appears to be a collection of expensive manufacturing operations, my inclination is to avoid the stock. Combine that with consistently weak gross margins and a complex story to translate GAAP to non-GAAP earnings, and the decision to look elsewhere becomes quite easy.

10 stocks we like better than QorvoWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Qorvo wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

Click here to learn about these picks!

*Stock Advisor returns as of April 3, 2017

Frank DiPietro has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.