Image Source: New York Times.
Continue Reading Below
Meal kits are the hottest trend in food these days.
It seems nearly every company, from start-ups to supermarkets to suppliers likeTyson Foods, has gotten in on the new phenomenon.
With start-ups like Blue Apron commanding valuations upwards of $2 billion, a sign that venture capital firms see big growth and potential profits in the fast-growing industry, why wouldn't it attract outside interest?
While it's not surprising to see companies likeWhole Foodsjumping on the meal-kit bandwagon with a partnership with Purple Carrot last week,the decision by theNew York Times(NYSE: NYT) this summer to launch a meal-kit service may have left some scratching their heads.
All the news that's fit to eat
In July, the so-called Gray Lady announced that it would begin selling meal kits from NYT Cooking made by start-up Chef'd, which has partnered with several other brands to deliver the boxed meals.
The service will offer 20 of the NYT Cooking's most popular recipes, including Kung Pao Chicken, Beef Bourgignon, and Shrimp Scampi. Meals start at $27 for two people, and come with a free eight-week digital subscription for a limited time.
The offer from theTimesmay seem odd, but it makes sense for a number of reasons.
As interest in food has boomed, the newspaper has capitalized, expanding coverage and its relationships with readers. In 2014, the paper launched a Cooking section and website, which has since attracted over 7 million monthly active users.From there, meal kits were a natural way to leverage and extend the brand as theTimesis a trusted source for recipes and information for millions of home cooks.
Print media has struggled in the digital age as advertising revenues continue to fall.Even newspapers with the brand recognition of theNew York Times have struggled to turn a profit, so they must look to new revenue streams for help. The company has expanded into other businesses to diversify away from the traditional news model, with moves like hosting live conferences, starting a wine club, and opening an online store selling branded products.
Similar to meal kits, the company now offers travel packages called Times Journeys, where travelers can go on far-flung tours led by theTimes' foreign correspondents.
TheTimesisn't the only publication looking to diversify its business.The Wall Street Journalhas been heavilypromoting its wine club, WSJWine, recently as the21st Century Fox(NASDAQ: FOXA)subsidiary also looks for ways to grow profits in the digital age. The idea seems to be the same as theTimes',as theJournal hopes to leverage its brand and reputation with its readers, many of whom are wine drinkers. The newspaper partnered with Direct Wines, a mail-order wine club for the service.Chef'd has also partnered with publications likeMen's HealthandWomen's Health to sell branded meal kits.
For theTimes, extensions like the meal kits may mean the difference between a thriving long-term business and one that continues to see revenues erode. Through the first six months of the year, its Other Revenue category, which includes income outside of circulation and advertising such as e-commerce, NYT Live, syndication, and rental income, grew only 2.7% to $43.8 million, 5.7% in total revenue. With NYT meal kits launching in July, the third-quarter report will be the first chance to see if there was any appreciable impact from meal kits.
Generating a profit in the meal-kit industry won't be easy for theTimes or anyone else. It's become highly fragmented, and the number of entrants likely means that many will struggle to grow and retain a meaningful subscription base. They will either have to consolidate or go out of business. Still, it's a smart move by theTimes, especially as Chef'd takes on much of the operating risk.
In order for publications like theTimesto thrive in the digital era, they must find new ways to bring value to their customers. It's already developed a strong fan base for its Cooking site, and that could make meal kits a worthy endeavor.
A secret billion-dollar stock opportunity The world's biggest tech company forgot to show you something, but a few Wall Street analysts and the Fool didn't miss a beat: There's a small company that's powering their brand-new gadgets and the coming revolution in technology. And we think its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors! To be one of them, just click here.
John Mackey, co-CEO of Whole Foods Market, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Jeremy Bowman has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Whole Foods Market. The Motley Fool recommends The New York Times. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.