Why Mortgage Costs Could Swell In 2017

By Motley Fool StaffMarketsFool.com

One of President Trump'searly executive orders increased costs for Federal Housing Administration mortgages -- causing FHA mortgage applications to drop 13%.

Homeowners looking torefinance to land a lower mortgage rateshould take note, as there are several factors at play that could lead to higher mortgage rates as Trump's administration progresses. Motley Fool analysts, Gaby Lapera and Nathan Hamilton discuss what they see moving mortgage rates in 2017.

Continue Reading Below

A full transcript follows the video.

5 Simple Tips to Skyrocket Your Credit Score Over 800!Increasing your credit score above 800 will put you in rare company. So rare that only 1 in 9 Americans can claim they're members of this elite club. But contrary to popular belief, racking up a high credit score is a lot easier than you may have imagined following 5 simple, disciplined strategies. You'll find a full rundown of each inside our FREE credit score guide. It's time to put your financial future first and secure a lifetime of savings by increasing your credit score. Simply click hereto claim a copy 5 Simple Tips to Skyrocket Your Credit Score over 800.

More From Fool.com

This podcast was recorded on Feb. 27, 2017.

Gaby Lapera: Let's talk a little bit about this executive order, and the FHA loan mortgage insurance. First of all,what is the FHA?

Nathan Hamilton:Yeah,we'll get a little bit into the details here. Mortgage 201/101,is kind of where we'll balance it.

An FHA loan isessentially a loan for borrowers that may not be able to put down 20% like a bank would require. FHA comes into the market andtries to make it cost efficient and cost effective for higher-risk home buyers. So, you can put down as little as 3.5% with an FHA loan. Andwhat the Trump Administration did --it may have been on day one or two of thepresidency of the administration -- is, reverse an Obama-era order that decreased the mortgage insurance rate premium. When Trump came in, he essentially flipped it and raised themortgage insurance premium by 0.25%. If you look at what it actually means in dollars, it's roughly about $30 per year. That'swhat the difference would be for the average homeowner. So it's not a huge change,but it definitely does signal something thatthe administration may be looking into in the future when they do havedirect influences. Getting the governmentsomewhat outside of the mortgage market,because if you look at it, the government is involved with the FHA...

Lapera:FHA stands for Federal Housing Administration.

Hamilton:Yep,Federal Housing Administration,Fannie MaeandFreddie Mac and so forth, other mortgage players, they are there to make the marketsomewhat more efficient. There is a taxpayer cost for those. In 2008, taxpayershad to bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bytens of billions of dollars, and they're still repaying those loans.

Lapera:Actually,fun fact, they have repaid their loans. It'sreally interesting,because they're still in conservatorship,technically...

Hamilton:So,they take all the profits, still?

Lapera:Yeah,the government is still taking all the profits, andshareholders are actually suing and saying, "It's time to let that go."I think they have repaid it. They've surpassed it by a lot, in the millions of dollars that they'vesuperseded the amount that they borrowed in the first place. So, we'llsee what happens with that,maybe we'll do another episode on it.

Hamilton:But,like I said, if you look at the administration,they have called for a reduction in big government, and those arepossible ways that that could be affected. If youlook at it in a very simple, plain-vanilla way, if they are making the market more efficient and they're removed from the market, it could increase costs for borrowers,whether that comes in the way of higherorigination fees,mortgage rates, and so forth. But really,I would say, if you look at the grand scheme, big picture, the Fedprobably has more of an impact in the near-term.

Lapera:Yeah. Andyou might be wondering, if you're a listener,why the federal government would be invested in people buyinghomes at all. Why would they want that to happen?Historically,people who buy homes in an area, that helpsincrease the prosperity of that area,because people who own homes aregoing to require a lot of services that employ people in the area. It'spart of this traditional idea of the American Dream thateveryone can own their own home. So,I think part of it is emotional and symbolic, andpart of it is hard economics. Owning a house really does help the area that you're in.

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.