Why Apple's New Streaming TV Service Doesn't Need to Rival Netflix

On Monday, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) announced a new streaming TV subscription service called Apple TV+. While the tech giant did reveal an impressive cohort of producers and famous actors and actresses to help kick the service off, as well as an entertaining sizzle reel of upcoming shows for the platform, there were more questions than answers after the service was unveiled.

Some prominent questions for the service, which is slated to launch this fall, include:

  1. How will Apple price the service?
  2. Will the service include a robust slate of licensed content in addition to Apple's original content?
  3. Will the service be available on third-party platforms such as Roku?

But here's a question that doesn't need to be answered: Can Apple TV+ rival Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX)?

Fortunately, Apple doesn't need its streaming TV service to be the next Netflix in order to succeed. In fact, it doesn't even have to make money.

An ecosystem model

Thanks to Apple's diversified ecosystem, Apple TV+ doesn't have to be a huge hit. The tech giant's revenue is derived from a combination of hardware and an array of services, making any new service a small piece of the pie. Indeed, Apple launched three other services alongside Apple TV+: Apple News +, a new credit card, and gaming service. And these new services are built on some powerful existing services, including the App Store, Apple Music, and Apple Pay. While Netflix depends heavily on its platform's continued growth since it is a pure-play streaming platform, Apple has built an ecosystem model with a range of different services.

As famed investor Warren Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B) (NYSE: BRK-A) owns 5.5% of Apple, said (via CNBC) during a talk this week at The Gatehouse's Hands Up for Success event about Apple's foray into streaming TV:

In addition, while investors should hope for the services Apple launches to be profitable (on a consolidated basis, they are extremely lucrative), they all don't have to contribute to its bottom line. Some services can simply play a role in making its ecosystem stickier, helping customers remain loyal and continue to buy Apple products and subscribe to various Apple services. If this is all Apple News+ achieves, it would arguably be a success.

Valuation matters

Then there's Apple's conservative valuation. Trading at less than 16 times earnings, the company simply doesn't need new services to be runaway hits. The tech company already has a strong foundation of robust free cash flow and a diversified and rapidly growing services segment to justify its current valuation. If Apple TV+ can eventually rival Netflix -- or even smaller players like Amazon's Prime Video or Hulu (owned primarily by Disney) -- this would just be icing on the cake.

10 stocks we like better than AppleWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Apple wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 1, 2019

John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Daniel Sparks has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway (B shares), Netflix, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has the following options: short January 2020 $155 calls on Apple and long January 2020 $150 calls on Apple. The Motley Fool recommends Roku. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.