Have you ever noticed that activist investors love business development companies (BDCs) that have not received permission to issue shares below net asset value? Maybe, or maybe you're thinking to yourself, "BORING." Industry Focus hosts Kristine Harjes and Gaby Lapera will change your mind about this esoteric topic during this clip from Industry Focus.
A full transcript follows the video.
A secret billion-dollar stock opportunity The world's biggest tech company forgot to show you something, but a few Wall Street analysts and the Fool didn't miss a beat: There's a small company that's powering their brand-new gadgets and the coming revolution in technology. And we think its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors! To be one of them, just click here.
This podcast was recorded on Nov. 16, 2016.
Kristine Harjes: I know BDCs have a pretty heavypresence of activist investors,and I have to assume that's because ofall these things they were just saying, where there's thisopportunity for mismanagement.
Gaby Lapera:Yeah,absolutely. But interestingly,activist investors are actually more attracted to BDCs that cannot issue more shares,because it's a lot easier for them to take control of them --
Harjes:You mean, people voted no?
Lapera:Yeah, people voted no. Typically, if people vote no, that means there's something wrong with the BDC, because it takes a lot for shareholders to vote no, forwhatever reason. So if they're voting no,it's because there's already something bad going on.
Harjes:So that's anindication of a lack of trust?
Lapera:Yeah,on the shareholders' part. And there'splenty of companies that never actually use this --that the shareholders vote yes andthe company's never do it, they just ask every yearjust because,because they're fine raising capital in other ways. But if you think about it, if a BDC has been told, "No,you can't issue any more shares,"it suddenly becomes a lot more easy --and they're already in trouble,so no one really wants to buy more shares of them, so they can't finance themselves, they can't issue themselves more shares below net asset value --it becomes a lot easier for an activist investor to start buying up shares and be able to take a stake in thatcompany that allows them to force that company to do what they want.
Harjes:So what is it that they want them to do at that point? How do youtake this and turn it around?
Lapera:Ittotally depends on the activist investor. I think some havebetter intentions than others.
Harjes:Do you think the primary goal there is to get that yes vote the next time it comes around?
Lapera:No. For most activistinvestors, they want to retain control of the company.
Harjes:Andthat's why they go for the ones that already voted no, that makes sense.
Lapera:Mostfrequently, activist investors want to change management structures or fee structures, in order,generally, to make it more profitable for shareholders. Butevery once in a while, they want to devalue the companyto make it easier for someone else to buy.
Harjes:Interesting. Have they been successful, on the whole?
Lapera:Yeah. BDCs are prime targets for activist investors. Especially because they're so complicated, and not a lot of people really 100% understand what's going on with them. But they are really high-yielding investment vehicles because they, much like real estate investment trusts, are required to pay out 90% of their taxable income as dividends. Because they're investing in high-risk, tiny businesses, the margin on their loans, or the debt they have, is a lot higher. So, they have the potential to yield super high returns.
Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.