Concerning energy research, the United States is falling behind the pack. Sure, we're in the middle quite possibly the latter stages of an oil and gas renaissance, but the nation's energy secure future, while paved with hydrocarbons, will increasingly rely on renewables deployment and grid innovation.
According to a newreportfrom the American Energy Innovation Council (AEIC), a committee of six executives including Bill Gates and General ElectricCEO Jeffrey Immelt, US funding for energy research development and demonstration (RD&D) is detrimentally modest stunting current growth and weakening the nation's competitive advantage. The committee argues that current spending of about $5 billion annually should be tripled immediately. As a percentage of economic output, US funding lags well behind its western counterparts Canada, France, Denmark, and Norway maybe the shining example of a hydrocarbon-fueled green state among others.
Green technology innovation is trending east however, and China, Japan, and South Korea are leading the charge the countries aredominatingglobal patents, leading filings in biofuels, solar thermal, solar PV, and wind. And research is leading to application. In 2013, China and Japandeployedmore than half of global solar PV additions. By 2025, China is expected to generate just over a quarter of global renewable power-together, Asia will account for more than 40 percent.
But back to that $5 billion of US funding where does it go? All over the place, really.
Appropriations for Department of Energy (DOE) RD&D Activities
Approximately 10 percent is designated for fossil fuels. Of that roughly $500 million allocation very little actually goes to oil and gas research only 5 percent, or $25 million. Instead, more than 70 percent is appropriated to coal and carbon sequestration research. The DOE's clean coal R&D isfocusedon increasing overall system efficiencies, developing carbon utilization and storage technologies for existing and new facilities, as well as reducing the capital cost of all of the above.
Around $1 billion is set aside for nuclear and fusion energy research. The DOEaimsto develop sustainable nuclear fuel cycles and extend the life of nuclear reactors. Unlike nuclear fission, fusion energy is still finding its feet. As a result, the research isdirectedat advancing the fundamental science to develop a predictable and sustainable fusion energy source.
A sizable 30 percent of the funding $1.5 billion is assigned to energy efficiency and renewable energy in relatively equal shares. $263 million is authorized for vehicle efficiency R&D roughly 10 times the amount for oil and gas-related research. The primaryfociof the DOE's Vehicle Technologies Office are electric/hybrid drive batteries and hydrogen fuel cell technologies.
Looking at renewables, solar R&D receives around $188 million; wind energy receives markedly less at $90 million. Together, their 2015 DOE research allocation is more than 20 percent less than that of clean coal. Not awful, but perhaps misguided wind and solargeneratemore jobs per average megawatt as well as more jobs per dollar invested than coal.
Finally, approximately $125 million is allocated for the electric grid. The DOE isworkingon interactive grid technology and advanced energy storage, vitally necessary tech if renewables are to be meaningfully scaled up.
The AEIC's own breakdown of spending is relatively similar $11 billion difference and a dramatic increase in grid funding notwithstanding. Their main quibble and they're not wrong is that the funding format is ill matched to its target industries. Simply put, small annual appropriations are not suitable for the energy industry, where large tranches are necessary over a defined multi-year period. Left unchecked, such funding decisions ultimately leave the US behind the curve.
The article The U.S. Spent $5 Billion On Energy Research In 2014 Where Did It Go? originally appeared on Fool.com.
By Colin Chilcoat of Oilprice.com. Oilprice has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of General Electric Company. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright 1995 - 2015 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.