According to DigiTimes, software giant Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) is considering a shakeup to the way that it charges computer makers for licenses for its Windows operating system. Microsoft is reportedly going to charge computer makers more for Windows licenses for computers with higher-end specifications -- such as more advanced displays and higher memory configurations -- than for computers with lower-end specifications.
Apparently, this wouldn't be an entirely new way of doing business for Microsoft: DigiTimes claims that beginning in 2017, Microsoft based its Windows licensing fees on the speed grades of the processors in the devices. The new licensing structure would simply be an extension of what the company was already doing.
Continue Reading Below
Let's go over what this will mean for Microsoft and notebook makers.
A likely positive for Microsoft
Although the overall personal-computer market continues to see a decline in unit shipments, there has been an interesting dynamic at play underneath the proverbial covers of the market. Chip-giant Intel (NASDAQ: INTC), which supplies most of the processors that go into Windows-based computers, has seen a steady increase in the average selling prices of its notebook computer processors.
In 2017, for example, Intel reported that notebook processor average selling prices grew 2% year over year. Intel reported a similar year-over-year increase in notebook average selling prices during 2016, as well.
What this tells us is that computer buyers are increasingly opting to buy computers with higher-end processors. Generally speaking, computer makers will pair higher-end processors with higher-end computers while restricting lower-end processors to otherwise lower-end computers. Microsoft likely is trying to cash in on this trend toward higher-end computer sales so that it, like Intel and the computer makers, can offset declining PC unit shipments by capitalizing on the shift toward higher-end computers.
A negative for computer manufacturers
DigiTimes, citing industry sources, says that "this move is expected to put further pressure on notebook makers, which currently faces rising component costs."
For some context, two significant parts of the bill of materials of a typical computer is the random access memory, or RAM, as well as the storage. In a low-end system, that storage is typically a hard disk drive, but in higher-end systems, computer makers opt for faster (but more expensive) NAND-flash-based solid state drives. Since demand for DRAM and NAND has been booming -- and key manufacturers are managing their capacity judiciously -- thanks to increases in both DRAM and NAND content in smartphones and data centers, prices for both commodities has been on the rise.
Computer makers are obviously impacted by those trends. Piling on higher Windows license fees -- which already make up a significant portion of a computer's overall cost -- is only going to hurt the computer makers. That hurt can come in one of two ways: Computer makers themselves could absorb the higher licensing fees, hurting their per-device profit margins, or they could pass those higher fees onto the consumer, which results in higher device prices and possibly lower overall demand.
If I had to guess, though, I'd imagine that computer makers are going to settle for the lower margins.
10 stocks we like better than MicrosoftWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Microsoft wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
Click here to learn about these picks!
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 5, 2018
Teresa Kersten is an employee of LinkedIn and is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. LinkedIn is owned by Microsoft. Ashraf Eassa owns shares of Intel. The Motley Fool recommends Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.