Lockheed Martin Corporation is a giant aerospace and defense contractor. It's one of the most recognizable names in the industry and is a great company. But it's not cheap right now, which is why you might want to take a look at these two other companies that play in the same spaces.
Continue Reading Below
Good company, expensive stockLockheed's current price-to-earnings ratio is above 19. Its five-year average, however, is closer to 14, so it's trading hands about 35% above its recent average. It's expensive based on price to sales and price to cash flow, too. Its yield, meanwhile, is around 3%, which is about 10% lower than the company's five-year average. It's a good company, but it's an expensive stock. So it's worth taking a look at some alternatives.
Boeing logo. Source: Boeing.
For example, Boeing . This company is best known for its iconic passenger planes, but it does a lot more. For example, it generated $30.4 billion from its defense, space, and security businesses last year. To be fair, the rest of its $96.1 billion in revenue came from commercial jets, but it's got some significant similarities to Lockheed.
One thing that's very different, however, is valuation. In fact, Boeing recently got even cheaper than it had been because the SEC is investigating its accounting treatment for its 747 and 787 aircraft programs. That's nothing to brush off, but it's likely to cause more of a black eye than broken bones. Thiw could be a nice buying opportunity, with the shares recently trading around 10% below its trailing five-year average for P/E, about 10% below its price-to-sales norm, and nearly 25% below its price-to-cash flow average.
The yield, meanwhile, is about 3.8%. That's more than you'll get from Lockheed and a whopping 70% higher than Boeing's five-year average yield. In all, Boeing's accounting issue could represent a good entry point for investors willing to be greedy while others are fearful. And while some might counter that Boeing looks like it's entering an economic soft patch, it's got a $490 billion backlog. That's around five years' worth of revenue at current run rates -- it has plenty of time to adjust to an industry slowdown.
Distorted numbersAnother stock to look at is United Technologies , which just sold its helicopter division to Lockheed in an effort to streamline its own business. United Technologies is trading nearly 15% below its average price to book value over the trailing five years and about 10% below its historical price-to-cash flow ratio.
The one ratio that makes United Technologies look expensive, however, could be confusing. Its price-to-earnings ratio is nearly 20, versus a five-year average of around 16. But that's largely because of one-time charges meant to improve the business, by bolstering margins through cost cuts. Take the one-time charges out, and the company's P/E drops to around 14, 12% or so below its historical average.
So United Technologies looks cheap, too. And while the dividend yield at nearly 3% is roughly what you'd get from Lockheed, it's 30% higher than United Technologies' five-year average yield -- from a company with over two decades of annual dividend increases under its belt. (Lockheed, for reference, has around 13 years of annual increases.)
United Technologies portfolio. Source: United Technologies.
All of that said, United Technologies is a more diversified company than either Boeing or Lockheed. For example, aerospace in some form makes up around half of United Technologies' business, but the rest includes things such as Otis elevators, security products, and climate control equipment. That, however, might be a desirable attribute if you don't want to be so heavily exposed to the military and/or aerospace markets.
Good vs. cheapWhen you're looking at Lockheed Martin, there's little doubt that you're researching an industry-leading company. But that means it's a good company, not a good value. Right now Lockheed looks expensive relative to alternatives such as Boeing and United Technologies. And while of this pair, only Boeing yields more than Lockheed, don't write United Technologies off on the dividend front. The company has 22 years of annual dividend increases behind it, and the yield is well above its historical norm -- suggesting that, in terms of valuation, now could be a good time to jump aboard. If you're looking at Lockheed, you should consider these two alternatives as well.
The article Forget Lockheed Martin Corporation: Here Are 2 Better Dividend Stocks originally appeared on Fool.com.
Reuben Brewer has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright 1995 - 2016 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.