It wasn't all that long ago that both Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) would have both been considered no-brainer investments in the tech market. While both companies have made stumbles transitioning their businesses to ride the next tech wave, only Microsoft has successfully stayed atop its board and surfed toward renewed success.
Microsoft's jump from a software-based company to cloud computing services has helped push the tech stalwart's stock price up about 150% over the past three years. Meanwhile, Oracle's slow move away from its legacy software business hasn't been as impressive, and investors have taken notice. Oracle's shares have failed to beat the S&P 500 benchmark during the past three years.
Continue Reading Below
But to really understand how these companies are doing, we need to take a closer look at their financials, what advantages they may have over their competitors, and how their valuations stack up against each other.
|Company||Cash||Debt||Free Cash Flow (TTM)|
|Microsoft||$131.5 billion||$86.3 billion||$33.6 billion|
|Oracle||$40.0 billion||$56.4 billion||$13.1 billion|
There really isn't much of a contest here between the two companies. Microsoft generates much more cash and has substantially more free cash flow than Oracle. This gives Microsoft more flexibility to adapt to economic downturns or snatch up smaller businesses to help spur new growth.
While Microsoft does have more debt than Oracle, its available cash more than offsets its liabilities.
|Company||P/E Ratio (TTM)||Forward P/E||EV/EBITDA|
The average price-to-earnings ratio for companies in the S&P 500 is about 25, which makes Oracle's shares relatively cheap compared with Microsoft's. But Microsoft's stock isn't all that expensive based on these metrics, either.
Meanwhile, the average EV/EBITDA for companies in the S&P 500 is about 17, which again makes Oracle's stock cheaper when compared with Microsoft's. So based on these metrics, Oracle gets the win on valuation.
There was a time when Oracle had a sustainable competitive advantage over its competitors. It could offer some of the best hardware on the market and get enough customers to use its products so that it became too expensive for them to switch to its competitors.
But nearly every hardware company has been forced to transition to cloud-based software and services in the past decade or so. Some have made the leap better than others. While Oracle has made changes to its business, it hasn't been enough to retain old customers. Oracle's cloud services and licensing segment -- which makes up 69% of its business now -- grew by just 1% in the most recent quarter, while all of its other revenue segments experienced year-over-year declines.
Meanwhile, Microsoft has done a fantastic job of moving from traditional software sales to recurring cloud-based software sales and adding services like its public cloud computing hosting service, Azure. In the most recent quarter, Microsoft's Office commercial products and cloud service sales increased 12%, its intelligent cloud services (which includes server products) jumped 22%, and sales from its popular Azure service (which holds 14% of the public cloud computing market) spiked 73% year over year.
In short, Microsoft has successfully moved to the cloud, and its sales are growing substantially from that transition. Microsoft easily gets the win in this category.
Microsoft for the win
There really isn't much of a contest between these two companies. Sure, Oracle's shares are technically less expensive than Microsoft's, but that doesn't make them a better value. Microsoft's sales across its most important revenue segments are growing, it's a leader in the expanding cloud computing space, and it has plenty of cash on hand to continue investing in its future.
Oracle, on the other hand, is still having a rough time transitioning to the cloud. The company's sales aren't growing as fast as they need to be, and it's still unclear how Oracle can set itself apart from its competitors.
For all these reasons, Microsoft gets the overall win as the better stock to buy in this matchup.
10 stocks we like better than MicrosoftWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Microsoft wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 1, 2019
Teresa Kersten, an employee of LinkedIn, a Microsoft subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.