Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc (MDRX) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc (NASDAQ: MDRX)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 21, 2019, 4:30 p.m. ET
Contents:
- Prepared Remarks
- Questions and Answers
- Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Greetings. Welcome to the Allscripts Q4 and Full Year 2018 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. (Operator Instructions) Please note this conference is being recorded.
I will now turn the conference over to your host, Stephen Shulstein, VP of Investor Relations. Mr. Shulstein, you may begin.
Stephen M. Shulstein -- Vice President of Investor Relations
Thank you very much. Good afternoon and welcome to the Allscripts Fourth Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. Our speakers today are Paul Black, Allscripts' Chief Executive Officer; Rick Poulton, our President; and Dennis Olis, our Chief Financial Officer.
We'll be making a number of forward-looking statements during the presentation and the Q&A part of the call. These statements are based on current expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that cause our actual results to vary materially. We undertake no obligation to revise these forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events. Please refer to our earnings release and SEC filings for more detailed descriptions of the risk factors that may affect our results. Please reference the GAAP and non-GAAP financial statements as well as the non-GAAP tables in our earnings release and the supplemental workbook that are both available on our Investor Relations website.
And with that, I'm going to hand the call over to Rick Poulton.
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Okay. Thanks, Stephen. Good afternoon, everybody. Thanks for joining our call today. As always, we appreciate both your time and your interest in Allscripts. It was a busy 2018 for Allscripts with a number of significant moves to both strengthen our financial foundation as well as position the company on a path to sustainable growth. With the closing of the sale of Netsmart at the end of the year, I think it's a really good time to catalog and summarize what these moves of the last few years have done for us.
So, first, from a financial perspective, our M&A activity added more than $300 million of annual recurring revenue to the company. And the net cost of all these activity of the last five years was 0. What I mean by that is without adding any debt, capital inflows have equaled all capital outflows. As a result virtually all of our operating cash flow generated over the last five years has either been reinvested back into our solutions or returned to our shareholders. Dennis will talk later about our free cash flow expectations, but suffice it to say, the company has never been financially sounder than it is today.
Second and more importantly, we have added some great growth platforms for the future in the form of new customers, new solutions and new end markets. So these include, first, in the EHR space, we continue the integration of the former McKesson business, which brought us more than 200 new clinical client relationships and more than an additional 250 financial client relationships. Collectively these clients provide more opportunities to cross-sell additional products and services and they also provide an opportunity to get better efficiency from our cost base.
Second, our acquisition of HealthGrid positioned Allscripts with the leading patient engagement platform in the industry. We integrated the HealthGrid capabilities into the FollowMyHealth platform, which enables provider organizations now to reach 100% of their patient populations both pre-visit and post-visit, without requiring their healthcare consumers to sign into a portal. We expect to see success in selling this patient engagement platform both inside and outside of our base of EHR clients.
Third, the addition of Practice Fusion to the company's previous investments in the payer and life science end markets has given Allscripts a platform that is unrivaled among our EHR peers. Our platform which we rebranded Veradigm is allowing Allscripts to provide solutions to these end markets and bring insights into the clinical workflow to drive results and improved care.
And finally with the integration of CarePort to our hospital discharge planning and post-acute referral platform, we have created the largest bridge, if you will, in the industry between traditional acute and post-acute care with bidirectional flow of information. With the explosion of Medicare Advantage and other risk-sharing plans, the value of this platform to our hospital clients as well as to payers continues to increase significantly and we expect nice future growth opportunities from it.
So, while we know the constant change in our reporting entity, can make it difficult to follow us, the changes have been very intentional and we believe they have positioned the company well in what you all know as a very rapidly changing market.
So, now let me turn to the fourth quarter results and some customer highlights. We reported record bookings in the quarter of $531 million, reflecting a 69% increase year-over-year with broad-based strength across all of our solution areas. While Netsmart had a strong sales quarter, if we exclude Netsmart from both periods, bookings still grew by double-digits on a year-over-year basis. And our pipeline remains strong reflecting the strength in both our provider and our Veradigm business. Dennis will give some further color on our outlook for bookings later in the call.
During the quarter, we had 12 new Sunrise facility wins, reflecting the strength of Sunrise platform for our acute clients. This brought our total hospital wins for 2018 up to 23 facilities or almost three times as many as we realized in the 2017 and more than two times what we saw in both 2015 and 2016. So we're obviously quite pleased with the momentum that we ended the year there.
Our fourth quarter totals include nine facilities that are part of an integrated cancer services provider that will deploy the Sunrise platform as their oncology solution. Looking ahead, we see significant opportunity for further growth at this client with the potential to deploy the Sunrise platform at additional facilities.
We also signed agreements with two new hospitals in Austin, Texas. One was called Arise Medical Center, the other Westlake Medical Center. Both of them got the full Sunrise clinical and financial solution. I would also add that both of these wins were competitive bids.
And finally, we signed a 10-year extension and expansion agreement with Heritage Valley Health System for the integrated delivery systems, physician practices, outpatient facilities and three hospitals. And we also signed a Paragon expansion with Saint Anthony Hospital. Each of these expansions were fully integrated clinical and financial solutions.
These wins demonstrate our ability to win new clients in a slow-growing hospital EHR replacement market, our strong value proposition to community hospital space and our best-in-class capabilities in oncology. It also demonstrates our ability to cross-sell additional solutions to these healthcare providers. I'm very proud of what our team has been able to accomplish during the fourth quarter.
Moving to the ambulatory market, we also had several competitive wins. We signed Community Health of Northwest Florida as a net new ProSuite client after an extensive competitive process. And for TouchWorks we signed a significant expansion at EngageMED, which included our practice management solution replacing a competitor's solution.
Additionally, we signed a large revenue cycle management services deal with Adfinitas Health. This is a 120-provider group, which represents a competitive takeout and a new logo for Allscripts.
Moving to our Veradigm business. They had a very solid fourth quarter across all of its product lines, but perhaps the most exciting news related to Veradigm happened after quarter-end. First, in January, Veradigm signed a memorandum of understanding with Microsoft to develop an innovative, integrated research model, enabling clinical research to be performed through point o -care technology platforms.
We believe this collaboration will drive development of a platform to help biopharmaceutical and clinical research organizations better conduct integrated clinical research and that's a recognition of the progress we've made developing solutions for our life science clients.
And secondly, last week at the HIMSS Conference, we announced that Veradigm signed a major 10-year agreement with NextGen. This agreement creates one of the largest EHR data networks in the world with approximately 150 million unique patient records, encompassing approximately half of the U.S. population.
Biopharma organizations will be able to access this network and data to support research activities across the entire product development life cycle. And payer organizations will be able to access this network to more efficiently interact with healthcare providers and their health plans.
We believe this agreement validates the strategy we've pursued at Veradigm and positions Veradigm as a leader in analyzing health data along with making that data actionable by directly integrating it to the clinicians' workflow.
On the patient engagement front, we saw FollowMyHealth with the integrated HealthGrid capabilities gaining momentum as we integrated this product across our sales channels. Our fourth quarter resulted in six new wins across our acute and ambulatory base.
In addition, we made significant traction outside of our EHR base with three new client wins, representing approximately 110 hospitals and 3,600 providers. With this momentum, we believe we have significant opportunities to continue driving adoption of our FollowMyHealth platform inside and outside our installed base.
And finally, our precision medicine platform 2bPrecise landed six new clients during the fourth quarter and continues to garner significant interest both inside and outside our EHR base. We expect continued success in this solution in 2019 and continued thought leadership in the industry from the team who has created it.
So overall let me repeat. The investments we've made over the last several years have positioned Allscripts with a number of unique platforms. And we believe these will drive sustainable growth in the quarters and years ahead.
So with that, let me turn the call over to Dennis to go through more financial details for the fourth quarter as well as our outlook for 2019.
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Rick. So as we review this quarter's numbers, please reference the schedules in the earnings release as well as supplemental data workbook available on the Allscripts Investor Relations website.
For clarity purposes, let me make a few opening remarks before diving into the results. First, my comments on the income statement will largely focus on non-GAAP metrics unless otherwise stated. Full reconciliations of GAAP and non-GAAP figures are available in the earnings release.
Second, effective January 1st of 2018, we adopted the new 606 revenue recognition standard using the modified retrospective approach. The adoption of the new standard resulted in a single-digit adjustment to revenue, and therefore, did not materially impact our fourth quarter results. As such all references to our current results are made after applying the new revenue recognition standard. Please review our SEC filings for further disclosures around the new standard.
Third, as a reminder we closed Practice Fusion transaction on February 15th of 2018 and began consolidating the results of that as of that date. Q4 includes a full quarter contribution from both Practice Fusion and from the EIS business, which closed in October of 2017.
Fourth, the divestiture of our OneContent business closed on April 2 of 2018 and therefore our Q4 results do not include financial results from this business unit.
And finally, we closed on the sale of Netsmart on December 31 of 2018 and as a result, our GAAP results now reflect Netsmart in discontinued operations for all periods presented. Our non-GAAP results however include the results from Netsmart through the date of sale.
Okay moving on to the fourth quarter results. As Rick noted, bookings totaled $531 million in the quarter and we saw strong bookings across the entire portfolio of products. Our reported backlog excludes Netsmart and now stands at $3.9 billion. This reflects both the impact of bookings as well as renewals in the quarter that are not included in the bookings metric. Q4 backlog was affected by the timing of renewals as well as adjustments to recently acquired businesses.
Turning to the income statement. Fourth quarter non-GAAP revenue totaled $538 million, a decrease of $8 million or 2% versus Q4 of 2017. Our year-over-year revenue was impacted by weakness in non-recurring client service revenue. Non-GAAP revenue reflected $1 million in acquisition-related deferred revenue adjustments in the fourth quarter of 2018. In the fourth quarter of 2017 such adjustments totaled $29 million.
GAAP revenue also excludes revenue from businesses classified as discontinued operations and therefore the Q4 2018 GAAP revenue of $442 million represents a 1% growth versus the fourth quarter of a year ago. Netsmart's Q4 non-GAAP revenue totaled $97.5 million growing 15% year-over-year but falling short of our expectations.
Looking at our total revenue split. Total recurring revenue was down slightly versus the same period a year ago and essentially flat sequentially. Non-recurring revenue was flat versus Q4 of 2017 and up $5 million sequentially. Thus, our total recurring revenue mix came in at 79% in the quarter. We continue to expect the trend in the high-70% to low-80% range for the full year of 2019.
Looking at revenue results by line item. Total software revenue in Q4 was flat year-over-year and now totals $350 million. Recurring software revenue consisting of subscriptions, recurring transaction, support and new maintenance was flat sequentially at $291 million. In the quarter, non-recurring software revenue increased 29% sequentially and 51% year-over-year.
Turning to client services. Consolidated non-GAAP revenue declined 5% year-over-year to $188 million in Q4. The decline was primarily driven by delays in upgrade activity. Recurring service revenue was flat sequentially, but increased 8% year-over-year driven by revenue cycle services and multiyear service offerings.
Moving to non-GAAP gross margin. Total gross margin was down 70 basis points year-over-year primarily attributed to the sale of OneContent business earlier this year which had higher margins than our overall business. Looking at operating expenses. Non-GAAP SG&A totaled $116 million, a slight increase year-over-year. The non-GAAP SG&A figure excludes transaction-related and other expenses. Non-GAAP gross R&D was $106 million approximately flat year-over-year. Recall that non-GAAP gross R&D excludes transaction-related and other expenses.
Our software capitalization rate for the quarter was 31% within our expectation to be in the low 30% range. We expect our software cap to be in the low 30% range in 2019. Adjusted EBITDA totaled $104 million which equates to 19% adjusted EBITDA margin.
Adjusted EBITDA in the quarter was negatively impacted by higher than expected employee healthcare costs, higher expenses at Netsmart from acquired businesses and additional investments in Veradigm.
Netsmart's adjusted EBITDA totaled $30 million in the fourth quarter and $102 million for 2018. This was below our expectations for the fourth quarter and was a result of higher expenses at their acquired businesses.
Looking below the line, total cash interest increased to $10 million which compares to $8 million from a year ago. GAAP diluted earnings per share in the quarter was $2.14 and reflected a $500 million pre-tax gain from the sale of Netsmart.
Please note that the GAAP results this quarter included transaction-related costs severance fees and other costs of $9 million. In the fourth quarter we made an adjustment to our 2018 effective tax rate to reflect the impact of R&D credits and a reduction of the base erosion and anti-abuse tax or the BEAT tax, which came as the result of the Netsmart divestiture. The result of this adjustment was a reduction in our full year effective tax rate to 23%. As a result of the gain recognized from the sale of Netsmart, we have exhausted most of our NOLs and expect to be a cash taxpayer for 2019.
Finally excluding non-cash adjustments and transaction-related and other expenses, non-GAAP net income attributed to Allscripts totaled $35 million, up 7% year-over-year. And non-GAAP EPS was $0.20 for the quarter representing an 11% year-over-year increase.
As a reminder, non-GAAP EPS is calculated net of non-controlling interest to reflect Allscripts' ownership portion of the partially owned, controlled, and consolidated businesses.
We ended the quarter with a principal balance of $350 million in secured debt and $345 million of convertible senior notes, a reduction of approximately $360 million in long-term debt quarter-over-quarter. These amounts exclude Netsmart's total debt which is no longer reflected in our year-end balance sheet.
As a result, we expect significant interest expense savings in 2019 as compared to 2018. Our leverage ratio at the end of the year is 1.7 times net debt looking at -- divided by 2018 EBITDA excluding Netsmart's. This is the lowest net debt ratio we have had since 2012. This reflects the elimination of Netsmart-related debt and proceeds from the sale.
Our balance sheet gives a significant flexibility for additional investments in high growth areas and a return of capital to shareholders. We repurchased $37 million of stock in the fourth quarter and $139 million for the full year. We now have $213 million remaining under our existing stock repurchase authorization. We expect to be opportunistic with additional share repurchases going forward.
Turning to cash. Q4 operating cash flow totaled a negative $14 million compared with $106 million of a year ago. Our free cash flow totaled a negative $62 million after adjusting for capital expenditures, capitalized software and purchased software.
Our free cash flow was negatively impacted in 2018 due to transaction-related expenses, Netsmart's lower-than-expected cash flow and transaction fees and a material prepayment with one of our key vendors that reduced the total overall cost of relationship, but negatively impacted cash flow in the fourth quarter.
As we've noted in the past cash flow will vary from quarter to quarter. As we move into 2019, we expect cash flow to improve from 2018 levels as one-time cash costs related to transactions will trend lower throughout 2019.
We expect some cash transaction-related expenses to continue in the first half of 2019. On a go-forward basis, we would expect a more normalized range of approximately 80% to 100% conversion from non-GAAP net income to free cash flow.
Turning to our outlook. We're providing guidance for the full year 2019 bookings and non-GAAP earnings per share. In addition, we're providing non-GAAP revenue guidance for the first quarter of 2019. So we expect bookings for 2019 of between $900 million and $1 billion. This reflects strength in both of our provider and Veradigm businesses.
We expect earnings per share of between $0.65 and $0.70 per share for 2019. This outlook reflects an effective tax rate of 24% for 2019. For the first quarter of 2019 we expect non-GAAP revenue between $430 million and $440 million.
As a reminder, we had a full quarter of OneContent revenue in the first quarter of 2018 and closed the acquisition of Practice Fusion midway through the first quarter of 2018, so this creates a difficult comp -- revenue comp for us year-over-year. We are reiterating our three-year revenue outlook of a CAGR of between 5.5% and 9% that we provided in January at an investor event.
While we don't expect growth to be linear, we believe this outlook provides a good framework of how to think about our revenue growth on a more long-term basis. To make 2019 comparisons easier, we are providing certain non-GAAP items for 2018 and 2017 excluding Netsmart results. This can be found in Table seven of today's earnings release.
And with that, I'll turn it over to Paul.
Paul M. Black -- Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Dennis. My remarks will cover the actions we've taken to position Allscripts to win in the provider marketplace. I will also cover the platforms we've built that leverage our installed EHR base, providing market opportunities outside that base, extending our reach to the rest of the healthcare marketplace.
In the United States, 95% of hospitals and 87% of physician practices now have electronic health records. This means that we need to continue innovating around the assets we have, offering healthcare providers solutions that improve care quality and lower costs. We believe that we are well situated in the marketplace.
Allscripts build platforms that complement and capitalize on our EHR market position with providers, delivering surround solutions to both this space and the clients outside it, to drive better patient outcomes.
Our electronic health record footprint, along with the investments that we've made, have allowed us to develop key platforms in consumer and patient engagement, community connectivity, precision medicine and payer life sciences. These platforms distinguish Allscripts from other EHR vendors and open significant market opportunities for us.
Looking ahead we believe Allscripts will benefit from the scale and industry relevance we've built with our vision and investments. We invested over $1.4 billion in gross R&D over the past five years. This drove overall growth, client retention Black Book recognition and other accolades around the world. We remain confident in the outlook, we shared earlier this year.
We believe we can capitalize on opportunities in provider end markets including international, consumer and care coordination. We can also drive additional adoption of services such as hosting and outsourcing. We see additional opportunities for Allscripts as the competitive landscape remains in flux for some stand-alone EHR companies.
We are pursuing new clients and expect to benefit from this industry dislocation. The marketplace is starting to recognize the leading position we have taken in the payer and life science end markets. We saw this in the long-term agreement Rick discussed with NextGen Healthcare.
This agreement highlights Allscripts' vision of building open, connected communities of health. These connected networks of payers, providers, pharma and research organizations will serve today's patients, who expect to be well informed and empowered consumers, in the context of their own care.
To wrap up we believe, Allscripts has never been better positioned to optimize market opportunities. We have a seasoned executive team have built a high recurring revenue model, a flexible balance sheet and relevant platforms that offer key solutions for healthcare providers, payers, life science companies and patients who act as consumers. We have the scale to drive operating leverage going forward. I want to thank our associates for their hardwork, our clients for their loyalty and shareholders for your confidence.
With that summary, let's open up the line for questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Jamie Stockton from Wells Fargo. please proceed with your question.
Jamie Stockton -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst
Hey good evening, Thanks for taking my questions. I guess maybe the first one, just because you didn't give a full year revenue number. It seems like the Q1 view implies kind of flat revenue year-over-year, if we adjust for all of the moving pieces I guess. Is that a reasonable assessment? And then with the 3-year view, implying a higher growth rate should we anticipate that that rate may be improved as 2019 progresses?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes. Thanks for the question Jamie. So as it relates to your first part of the question the revenue will not be flat to flat, if you factor in the fact that OneContent was in our Q1 results for the full quarter of 2018 and Practice Fusion was in for about half a quarter. So that added -- the net of all of this was about a $12 million or $13 million impact that Q1 revenue that will not be repeatable in 2019. So, that speaks to about a three-point gap year-over-year.
Jamie Stockton -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst
Okay. And then the pacing of growth through the rest of the year any color on how we should think about that?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
So I mean the range we've put out there Jamie is up one to down one on a reported basis for the reasons Dennis just told you, right? So I think you can interpret that we would expect better and more favorable comps over the balance of the year and would expect more favorable results from that.
Jamie Stockton -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst
Okay and then maybe just on bookings. The outlook that you guys gave for 2019 for the residual businesses is there a way that we should think about that as far as in comparison to 2018? What was the implied year-over-year growth there? And that will be it for me.
Richard J. Poulton -- President
I think you should think about the range as consistent with our near-term and longer-term revenue outlooks.
Jamie Stockton -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst
Okay. Thanks.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Sean Dodge from Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.
Sean Dodge -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Good afternoon. Thanks. On the revenue the three-year CAGR guidance you provided I guess bridging that to EBITDA over the time frame it sounds like you're confident there's still plenty of leverage in the model and maybe also some costs that come out. I guess is that right? And then anything you can share on how we should be thinking about what the EBITDA trajectory looks like over that timeframe compared to revenue?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes, we've provided EPS growth. We have we didn't provide EBITDA expectations or outlook going forward because we provided again a number of different metrics that we thought were important including a view of bookings and cash flow over the course of the year.
To your point though I think there are still some synergies to be had that will continue to drive and recognize over the course of 2019 and beyond and hope to -- and plan to continue to improve our EBITDA levels from their existing point over the course of the next couple of years.
Sean Dodge -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Okay. And then I guess on Veradigm the partnership you announced with NextGen looks like you're putting a lot more wood behind the data strategy. Can you talk a little bit about the revenue model there? Are you selling access to this data on more of a subscription basis? Or in the case of something like a clinical trial are these more onetime purchases?
And then it sounds like there's an opportunity to bring in a whole bunch of other Allscripts offering to help make that data more actionable. I guess how should we be thinking about the knock-on benefits beyond just selling access to the data network?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
So, first off, I mean the -- we have a number of product lines inside of Veradigm and we referenced some of them. Some of those product lines spill over to the next NextGen relationship but not all. We have a number of product lines that are -- some are data-related some are very workflow-related and bringing eliminating inefficiencies with access in the point of care.
The NextGen relationship just adds a lot of scale which will make us that much more attractive to those end users for those end markets and clients that we already have. So, we're excited about the relationship because that scale will translate to immediate incremental value in the nature of those relationships.
And we, of course, will share some of that value. The value gets shared between us and NextGen. So, it's a good win-win for both companies. It's clearly leveraging our platform.
And the first part of your question what -- how are those contracts related? I mean, I'd say we have recurring relationships that tend to have kind of some project characteristics to it. So a project and then that goes on to a different project from there.
Sean Dodge -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Okay. Very helpful. Thank you.
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Welcome.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Gillmor from Robert W. Baird. Please proceed with your question.
Matthew Gillmor -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
Hi. Thanks for the question. Maybe asking about the fourth quarter performance. Relative to your guidance, it sounds like revenues were impacted by delays with software upgrades. And I think EBITDA was also impacted by higher costs at Netsmart. I just want to make sure those were the right variables relative to the guidance. And then for the upgrade activity, could you just provide some color around that? What caused the delays and maybe what product that was tied to?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes. Thanks. So as I said in the prepared remarks, the revenue and EBITDA misses relative to our previous guidance for fourth quarter were pretty much evenly split between Netsmart and the non-Netsmart portions of the business. So speaking to the non-Netsmart component, it was primarily driven by -- the revenue miss was primarily driven by delays of some of the upgrades primarily in the hospital space that got pushed out of the fourth quarter and into the first half of 2019. So that is not lost revenues, just revenue that's been pushed out.
From an EBITDA standpoint, that did contribute -- part of the upgrade did contribute to part of it. We did see some increased costs in healthcare as well. So that was another contributing factor to the EBITDA miss in a non-Netsmart piece.
Matthew Gillmor -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
Okay. Thanks for walking through that. And then as a follow-up, I was hoping to get an update on your perspective with respect to capital deployment post-Netsmart. You said you're levered at 1.7 times historically you've operated above three times. So, just curious where you expect to keep leverage post-Netsmart? And then as you look out over the next six months to 12 months, what's sort of the deployment appetite between M&A versus buybacks?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Well, we feel very good about our financial foundation and the dry powder that we have and I think you should expect that to be put to work to create value. What the balance is between share repurchase versus strategic investments, will be a function of what we see in the market for assets that we think makes sense, and are at when we like, and are at prices we think makes sense, and then also with an eye toward where the shares trade as well.
You can see we were quite aggressive while we were able to in the fourth quarter buying back what we thought was ridiculously undervalued stock. So we'll continue to navigate that balance. I mean, our goal is to create a really strong platform for the long-term, so we don't -- we do -- we will look to put capital to work with strategic assets not just simply share repurchases, but we want to be a discriminating buyer. And I think our track record for the last five years it is unmatched by anybody that I've seen. And so I think we've earned the right to kind of keep doing that.
So we'll keep doing that. In general, the marketplace is littered with undersized companies, some of which have some pretty good technology. And I think we can take advantage of that.
Matthew Gillmor -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
Got it. Thanks, Rick.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Stephanie Demko from Citi. Please proceed with your question.
Stephanie Demko -- Citi -- Analyst
Hey, guys, thank you for taking my question. Another one on the Veradigm side, just thinking about the data asset you already have. Is there any incremental opportunity to partner beyond NextGen to further your data asset? Or do you think this is the right size for the business?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Well, this is a really strong relationship. I mean, NextGen has a nice footprint in the ambulatory space. And so we'll say it again combined with what we have, I mean we believe we've already created a actionable data set that is unrivaled in the marketplace today around at least ambulatory data.
But, yeah, the answer to your -- direct answer to your question is, yes, we think there are other opportunities as well. And we have some active conversations going on. I don't want to predict that because again it has to make sense for both parties, but we now have a model of partnering that we think works and we'll continue to leverage that with other people as well.
Stephanie Demko -- Citi -- Analyst
Are the partnerships in the pipeline always in the EHR space? Or is there any possibility more than a NextGen partnership outside, the tech side or some of the payers where you're seeing folks?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Yeah. I mean there are lots of possibilities. So I would not say anything has the label of being limited to only a certain thing. We're -- the size we've created already with the collection of assets we own and now with the partnership arrangement by definition makes almost everybody else in the ecosystem more interested in what we have.
Stephanie Demko -- Citi -- Analyst
I hear you there. Now also you've touched a little bit on the clinical trials opportunity do you have and will you show us the data? But you have mentioned a few times in the past some payer facing opportunities also, could you talk a little bit to that?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Yeah. Well, I mean we have payer opportunities with a lot of our solutions. I think when we speak to Veradigm, so for instance, I'll repeat what I said in some of my remarks. I talked about our CarePort entity, which has a platform around, I call it the bridge between acute and post-acute care. That is a very interesting asset for payers, and so that's an opportunity to kind of leverage into the payer space. Payers are interested in our pharma health engagement platform as well.
So I think the ability to touch payers goes well beyond just some of the opportunities we talked about at Veradigm. But with Veradigm, we've got a whole series of clinical workflow solutions for payers that the best way I just think for you to think about it is, it creates a lot of efficiencies with a traditional -- we had inefficiencies with -- intersecting with the point of care and engaging with the healthcare providers in their networks or health plans.
And so we can break down those walls eliminating efficiencies that create value. We share the value with them. So it's a model that will continue to innovate new solutions for them, but that's the nature of most of those solutions.
Stephanie Demko -- Citi -- Analyst
Looking forward to see how it evolves. Now one quick housekeeping one and then I'll hop back in the queue. But how should we think about Netsmart's contribution to the 2018 bookings? Or put another way, what is the implied organic bookings growth in the guidance ex that part?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes, Stephanie. We haven't historically provided bookings results for any of our product line segments and we don't really plan on doing that now. We've provided a lot of color on table 7 in the supplemental tables that we provided with the earnings release. And we'll continue to -- we provided also our growth projections for next year and I think that's -- that we're going to keep that at that level.
Stephanie Demko -- Citi -- Analyst
Okay. Is it safe to view the organic bookings growth going forward as in line with your long-term growth targets? Or is there anything to call out?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
I think that's a fair assumption, that over the same period we would see bookings in that same range.
Stephanie Demko -- Citi -- Analyst
All right. Thank you, appreciate it.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Garro from William Blair & Company. Please proceed with your question.
Jeff Garro -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
Yes. Good afternoon. And thanks for taking the questions. I want to ask about the forward outlook. And without giving the full year revenue guidance, I wanted to ask maybe more specifically about visibility. I was hoping you could frame a visibility discussion in terms of the backlog coverage compared to historical levels? And maybe the proportion of the bookings that you've guided to that might immediately convert to revenue again compared to historical trends?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes. So again we thought it was prudent to give the one quarter of revenue guidance. I think obviously, we've got clean visibility to that. We talked about -- when we gave our long-term guidance we talked about the fact that there could be an inorganic and organic component to that.
So we wanted to have that flexibility to adjust our guidance throughout the course of 2019 in the event, we had any type of M&A activity. In terms of backlog coverage, we do provide a roll-off schedule in the K which will be filed tomorrow which will show you our backlog and how that rolls-off on an annual basis throughout the next number of years. And I'd say that the coverage in 2019 that you'll see in that balance is pretty consistent with what we've seen in prior years.
Jeff Garro -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
And then on the bookings guidance, any change in mix between near-term and long-term bookings? I know managed services contracts can have kind of an outsized impact in out years, but not necessarily contributing in the current year?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes that's right Jeff. But I would tell you that our guidance for bookings going forward doesn't have any material change in the makeup of the bookings for prior periods.
Jeff Garro -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
That's great. One last one for me on the bottom line guidance and you already spoke to your opportunistic approach to share repurchase. But I just want to clarify whether your EPS guidance assumes any kind of baseline of use of those Netsmart proceeds for share repurchases?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes. The guidance that we provided assumes flat number of shares from where we end the year for 2019. So we assume at a minimum we're going to buyback any stock awards that we grant during the course of the year.
Jeff Garro -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
Got it. Thanks for taking the questions.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Eric Percher from Nephron Research. Please proceed with your question.
Eric Percher -- Nephron Research -- Analyst
Thank you. I want to turn to the M&A commentary. And Rick I was struck by your comment about what you've created without net spending, so obviously the transactions over the last several years created a lot of value for the enterprise, but aren't necessarily reflected in equity value. I know you're operators and you're going to continue to take advantage of opportunities when you see them. But has this experience changed the way you think about strategic M&A or some of the opportunities you wouldn't have considered in the past? What's changed in your view?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Well I mean, I think maybe we have to iterate on your question a little bit Eric, but let me start. I mean, what's changed? I mean, so first I'd say the experience of five years has reinforced our thinking as we've approached some of these deals. I mean, I think we've gotten good yield out of it. We've had some very different structures and very different types of assets we've gone after from very simple things like buying the McKesson business which seems like a pretty low growth kind of turnaround-type story to very speculative investment we did a few years ago when we invested in NantHealth.
And just like investors you're not going to hit a home run on everything, but when we put all of that into the equation when I say we've spent zero net zero and the winners and losers. And so we tried different things, but all in our take on how we can create value I think we reinforced that. We're reading the markets right and that there are good opportunities for patients. So in that regard, I'm more bold than ever that I think we can do smart things with capital deployed. That said, it's been very frustrating to watch our stock performance.
And it's clearly a need to balance why we'd buy somebody else's earnings at a big premium when ours are trading so cheap. So we are acutely aware of that and we balance that all the time. So that's been another takeaway for us, but I think we will watch how the market responds to how we perform this year. We'll watch the opportunities in front of us. And if we continue to get the returns we think off of the growth platforms that I went through and the performance we think we can get then we'll continue to add to those.
I mean, we have a differentiated ability in my view and that we have scale that gives us access to capital bigger than a lot of smaller guys. And there's a lot of good innovation and technology happening around industry that we can bring to market faster than let's just say some of our larger competitors who have shunned acquisitions and have a model where they don't like where they tend to want to do everything on a native integrated basis.
So we're in unique position and I think we can exploit that. But we need to do it smart and we need to do it to balance against where our stock trades. So sorry for the long-winded, but I think that just lets you inside my head a little bit.
Eric Percher -- Nephron Research -- Analyst
No, that's helpful perspective. Thank you.
Operator
Our next question comes from line of Richard Close from Canaccord Genuity. Please proceed with your question.
Richard Close -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst
Great. Thanks for the question. I guess for Paul or Rick as you think about the business and your comments just a second ago of bringing innovative products to market either through development or M&A where do you see the most opportunity from a contribution to revenue? Is it focusing in on something like Veradigm or bringing new products to the provider market? Just trying to get a sense of where you're at in terms of what you can bring to market here in terms of functionality.
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Yes, I think Richard -- I'll start and Paul can jump on it. Look healthcare providers are going through a fair amount of belt-tightening right now for obvious reasons. They are not -- we're not seeing a pattern where they're spending money like drunken sailors. I'm not saying they ever were that way, but the belt is definitely tightened. So scaling revenue solely off the back of healthcare providers, I think, is we've had -- we've purposely made conservative assumptions about that.
I think there are needs out there in the provider community that will create pockets of growth and we've tried to position ourselves to take some of them. So again, patient engagement is on top of mind for the CEO of every health system, large or small, right now. And we think we've got the best answer in the industry right now. So that's good enough for us. There's other areas like care coordination, same thing. That's what our CarePort business does.
So we try to position ourselves in where we think the demand will be. But generally speaking, providers have to be a little thriftier, because of all the change they're dealing with. So it's important to balance that provider view with the payer and life science view. And that's why it's been a push for us and it's an area that we do think can translate to revenue growth faster.
And so, again, you're familiar Richard with the guidance, the longer-term guidance we've put out in January. And you saw some of our organic expectations for what we'll do with our Veradigm business there. And they're obviously a lot more robust than we assumed on the provider side. So let me pause there and I don't know, Paul, you want to add anything? Or Richard, do you have any follow-up to that?
Paul M. Black -- Chief Executive Officer
I'd just add Richard that the ROI element, that we've talked about in the last three or four calls, continues to be a big deal, just on the provider side for all the reasons that Rick mentioned. And we have a number of solutions and opportunities that we have in place there that can drive right toward some of the issues that they have around patient flow, around getting paid accurately for the business that comes in or the patients that they see and for getting more new patient acquisition as a result of some of the things that Rick discussed.
But the ROI, in general, also have to do with in their perspective, how can I take these solutions that are now mission-critical and offer them up in a lower-cost manner? So there's capabilities that we have around hosting, capabilities we have around outsourcing, managed services and other things like that that, while they may not, in some cases, be as high margin as pure software, they're still pretty darn good margin.
And you lock the client in for a long period of time and you're able to have a better exchange with them from a business standpoint of additional value that you're bringing to them.
Richard Close -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst
As a follow-up maybe to one of the comments you just said, Rick. On the Veradigm side, do you -- are you guys looking at any acquisitions on that front? I mean you mentioned the organic growth there and that's impressive and you guys have had success. But are you contemplating acquisitions on that front as well?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
I'm not expecting to drop anything on you tomorrow Richard. But, yes, I think there are assets in that space that can also augment what we have and continue to position us as a leader among, who you might think of as our traditional peers in this area.
Richard Close -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst
Yeah. Great. Thank you.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Mike Ott from Oppenheimer. Please proceed with your question.
Mike Ott -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
Good afternoon and thanks for taking my question. Today you mentioned a number of competitive wins. I'm curious, if you're seeing any changes in the competitive landscape, especially ambulatory with one of your ambulatory competitors recently going private.
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Yes. It's -- we've noted a few wins but our team -- let me answer this way. Our team that is in charge of -- that didn't spend in ambulatory business for us now will include both our clinical assets as well as our financial assets is pretty excited to compete this year. Because of the transaction you mentioned as well as some other things that have happened in the industry we think our competitive standing has never been stronger in the last few years in the ambulatory space. So, we are excited to see where we can take that this year.
Mike Ott -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
Great. Thanks Rick. And then curious also what specifically Microsoft is contributing to Veradigm in your partnership there?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Well, Microsoft first of all brings some IQ to the table. And they'll bring some of their AI and LP tools to that collaboration or at least that's what's envisioned. I think that -- let me just leave it there for now.
I mean we are a partner of theirs. A lot of our text back is obviously in Microsoft .NET architecture and code. And we are big users of the Azure platform for some of our cloud solutions. So, we have a fairly deep relationship with them already and it was a natural entity to collaborate with. But they're quite anxious to apply some of their let's just call it higher IQ assets into the healthcare space and that's what we're going to be doing with them.
Mike Ott -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
Great. Thanks a lot.
Operator
Thanks Mike. Our next question comes from the line of Ricky Goldwasser from Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.
Ricky Goldwasser -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Yes, hi good evening. Just going back to the delay in upgrade activities when you think about the delays is this just like one specific facility or provider or was this more widespread this quarter?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes, it was a little more widespread. There wasn't one provider that was -- that had that impact. There were several different acute clients that we have that pushed out their upgrades. So, I think as I said earlier it's primarily in the acute space.
Ricky Goldwasser -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
And when we think about your guidance you said that the expectation is that this is going to be pushed out from 4Q to second half. So when we think about that acceleration in the remainder of the year what percent of that acceleration coming from moving these revenues from fourth quarter to 2Q I'm assuming?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Yes Ricky the comment was that those upgrades would get pushed into the first half of the year not the second half of the year. So, we would expect to see improved improvements over the course of 2019.
Ricky Goldwasser -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Okay. So we should assume -- so second quarter guidance factors that in?
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
We haven't provided any second quarter guidance. We gave revenue guidance for one quarter. We'll guide the second quarter at the end of the first quarter.
Ricky Goldwasser -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Okay. And just to clarify I know you talked about the 12 new Sunrise wins. Just want to make sure so all these are new customer wins? Or are these extensions?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Well, I commented on both buckets really. I was talking a lot about the wins. So I talked about 12 new hospital wins in the quarter 23 for the year. Those are new wins. But I also did mention at the end of that comment a couple of large expansion deals that were just kind of continuations of relationships we already have with some slight expansion to what the scope was...
Ricky Goldwasser -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Okay. So just going back just to follow-up on the replacement comments and the competitive environment. So when you talk with your clients, what are they citing as the research for selecting you?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Best value proposition. That's a combination of feature functionality, where we're going long-term, economics, flexibility, you name it.
Ricky Goldwasser -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Okay. And then one last thing just going back to the provider comment and just the fact that they're tightening their belts and they have -- they're going through their own cost reductions and reimbursement pressure. If we think about that long-term guidance that you provided a few months ago, I think, you're thinking about 2% to 3.5% weighted contribution from providers. So how should we think about that between just expansion within your existing core versus new wins?
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Well, it collectively represents Ricky both a some -- we expect to be a share shift winner over time. There's definitely churn that happens in the industry. We will not retain every single client we have today, but we are continuing to win and we expect to be a share shift winner. So, some of that growth comes from that. Some of it comes from expansion of what you'd call wallet share with the existing client. So there is new solutions that they need. There's new potential expansion of services into those accounts as well. So you get a combination of just both wallet share expansion as well as new footprints.
Ricky Goldwasser -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Thank you.
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Welcome.
Operator
We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. And I will now turn the call over to Mr. Shulstein for closing remarks.
Stephen M. Shulstein -- Vice President of Investor Relations
Thank you everyone for joining Allscripts' fourth quarter earnings conference call. We appreciate your interest and have a great evening.
Operator
This concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Duration: 58 minutes
Call participants:
Stephen M. Shulstein -- Vice President of Investor Relations
Richard J. Poulton -- President
Dennis Olis -- Chief Financial Officer
Paul M. Black -- Chief Executive Officer
Jamie Stockton -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst
Sean Dodge -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Matthew Gillmor -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
Stephanie Demko -- Citi -- Analyst
Jeff Garro -- William Blair & Company -- Analyst
Eric Percher -- Nephron Research -- Analyst
Richard Close -- Canaccord Genuity -- Analyst
Mike Ott -- Oppenheimer -- Analyst
Ricky Goldwasser -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Transcript powered by AlphaStreet
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
10 stocks we like better than AllscriptsWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Allscripts wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
*Stock Advisor returns as of January 31, 2019
Motley Fool Transcribers has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.