You'll only learn so much about mountain climbing (or investing) by watching others.
Continue Reading Below
The biggest news to come out of Omaha in recent months -- at least in financial circles -- is word that super-investor Warren Buffett'sBerkshire Hathaway, Inc. has taken a nearly $1 billion investment in tech giantApple Inc.The catch?
It almost certainly wasn't Warren Buffett who pulled the trigger on Apple, and was far more likely to be an investment made by Ted Weschler, Todd Combs, or even both of the men who now manage a part of Berkshire's investment portfolio, and will take over all investment duties when Buffett steps down.
Here are three reasons that help explain why it wasn't the Oracle of Omaha, and most importantly, why it matters to you.
1. Forget the "value" argument
A constant thread in the financial news regarding Berkshire's investment in Apple, is that Apple's stock has fallen squarely into "value" territory for Buffett. The counter-argument is two-fold. To start, Buffett has stated in the past that he doesn't know how to value Apple. In other words, all the price-to-earnings ratios, return on equity, and price-to-book value multiples don't matter to Uncle Warren.
Continue Reading Below
In other words, it's not about the financial ratios. It's thebusinessitself that Buffett doesn't feel comfortable trying to value. Furthermore, Buffett hasn't been a classic value investor in decades. Buffett's approach is best described in words he wrote years ago: He'd rather buy a "wonderful business at a fair price than a fair business at a wonderful price."
But here's the bottom line: If the man doesn't feel like he can grasp its business enough to put a value to it, all of the arguments out there about Apple's valuation or the quality of its business are moot when it comes to Buffett.
2. Lacks a typical Buffett competitive moat
One of the most important things that Buffett says he wants in a company is a strong competitive advantage. Looking at Berkshire's operating subsidiaries, you see the competitive advantages clearly, such as BNSF Railways' and Berkshire Hathaway Energy's near-monopoly in most markets they serve, and the huge costs a competitor would have to spend to enter and compete in those markets. Looking at Berkshire's stock portfolio,Coca-Colahas a very strong competitive advantage with consumers simply in its brand equity. There are plenty of high-quality, lower-cost alternative beverages, but Coke remains hugely popular around the world, simply because it's Coke.
And while the argument could be made that Apple's brand power has become as strong as that of Coca-Cola, it's not a business that falls within Buffett's "circle of competence." Factor in the historical reality that every technology -- particularly consumer tech -- eventually gets disrupted, and Apple probably remains a business that Buffett won't bother trying to understand better.
3. Follow the money
Since joining Berkshire in 2011 and 2010 respectively, Ted Weschler and Todd Combs have been gradually handling more and more of Berkshire's investment portfolio. But Buffett is still the one making the multi-billion dollar investments. In other words, at roughly $1 billion, this deal is probably too "small potatoes" to have been a Buffett investment.
The more likely case? Combs and Weschler, who invest independently of one another, but are compensated based on both their individual returns as well as that of the other, probably worked together on the Apple investment, or simply both decided to put a portion of their individually managed portfolios in the "iStuff" maker's stock.
The big lesson
Watching Buffett and other successful investor's moves can be informative, but there's only so much good it will do you as an investor. It's no different than watching Jordan Spieth swing a golf club, Stephen Curry shoot a basketball, or Neil deGrasse Tyson calculate the orbital velocity of a comet: You won't get better by watching. Investing is little different than any other pursuit, in that your success will largely be a product of what you put into it.
And that means doing what Buffett (and Combs and Weschler) do: Read company filings. Know how to understand a balance sheet. Invest in what you understand; avoid what you don't, and learn as much as you can.
If you truly want to be a successful investor, you'll learn how to avoid making mistakes you could have easily avoided. Particularly the mistake of investing in a company just because someone else did, too. Even if itwasWarren Buffett.
The article 3 Reasons Warren Buffett (Probably) Didn't Buy Apple and 1 Big Lesson originally appeared on Fool.com.
Jason Hall owns shares of Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and Coca-Cola. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and Coca-Cola. The Motley Fool has the following options: long January 2018 $90 calls on Apple and short January 2018 $95 calls on Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright 1995 - 2016 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.