If you can't compete on price or service and have a reputation for not treating consumers well, then a rival that's making plans to come to one of your markets represents a disaster of the highest order.
Continue Reading Below
That's why AT&T is pulling out all the stops in Louisville, Ky., in an attempt to stop Alphabet's Google from gaining access to its utility poles to speed up the rollout of Google Fiber. The wireless carrier and Internet service provider filed a lawsuit to stop a new rule, which the Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government has passed, from going into effect.
The ordinance, "One Touch Make Ready," would allow multiple providers to use the city's utility poles another company manages. That would let Google, which has identified Louisville as a potential market, enter the city without having to build as much infrastructure. Of course, that would speed the process for Google Fiber and would give consumers more choice.
AT&T, as you might imagine, doesn't agree with the new rule and has filed a lawsuit, which TV station WDRB posted on its website, trying to stop the ordinance. Alphabet/Google Fiber, of course, thinks the suit is without merit and posted its own response.
Source: Google Fiber.
What is AT&T suing over?
In a statement to a local business news publication, AT&T defended its position and explained why it took the issue to court.
Continue Reading Below
"Louisville Metro Council's recently passed 'One Touch Make Ready' Ordinance is invalid, as the city has no jurisdiction under federal or state law to regulate pole attachments," AT&T said in a statement to Louisville Business First. "We have filed an action to challenge the ordinance as unlawful. Google can attach to AT&T's poles once it enters into AT&T's standard Commercial Licensing Agreement, as it has in other cities. This lawsuit is not about Google. It's about the Louisville Metro Council exceeding its authority."
Pole attachments are generally allowed under the current system, but the new rule makes the process easier, requiring less back and forth between companies. For example, the ordinance would allow Google, or another provider, to access the poles without notifying AT&T. The company objected to that provision strenuously in its lawsuit:
On February 11, 2016, Louisville Metro adopted an ordinance that purports to permit third parties to perform work on AT&T's communications network, in some cases without so much as prior notice to AT&T. Under the new ordinance, where a third party seeks to attach equipment to a utility pole in the rights-of-way and AT&T already has lines or other equipment on the pole, the third party may remove, alter, and relocate AT&T's facilities as it deems necessary. If the third party believes its work on AT&T's facilities would not cause or reasonably be expected to cause a customer outage, the third party need not notify AT&T before conducting such work. If, on the other hand, the work would cause or reasonably be expected to cause a customer outage, the third party may proceed after giving AT&T thirty days notice.
Basically, the new ordinance doesn't require new providers to tell AT&T they're accessing the poles if doing so isn't likely to have customers notice or to result in outages. That provision would speed Google's launch and bring residents another choice faster.
What is Alphabet saying?
Chris Levendos, directorof national deployment and operations for Google Fiber, expressed his support for the ordinance, which, as he noted in a blog post, the council passed unanimously. He said he believed the "One Touch Make Ready" would speed the process of getting high-speed fiber Internet service to citizens there, and he expressed his company's "disappointment" over the AT&T lawsuit.
"Google Fiber stands with the City of Louisville and the other cities across the country that are taking steps to bring faster, better broadband to their residents," he wrote. "Such policies reduce cost, disruption, and delay, by allowing the work needed to prepare a utility pole for new fiber to be attached in as little as a single visit -- which means more safety for drivers and the neighborhood."
He explained that the new rules would allow the work to be done by a team of contractors that the pole owner itself has approved, instead of having multiple crews from multiple companies working on the same pole over weeks or months.
Who will win?
It's worth noting that AT&T has its own plans to offer fiber service in Louisville and that the company would gain an advantage in doing so if it can be first to market. AT&T's lawsuit looks to be an attempt to stall a rival, as the company did ask for an injunction against One Touch Make Ready.
The company has also put itself in conflict with the city's mayor, Greg Fischer, who took to social media to object to AT&T's actions.
"We will vigorously defend the lawsuit filed today by ATT; gigabit fiber is too important to our city's future," he wrote.
Ultimately, it seems unlikely that AT&T will prevail even if it wins the court case. You can't fight progress with stall tactics forever, and the best move for AT&T -- and the residents affected -- would be to compete by offering a better fiber product than Google. It's also never a good idea to poke at Alphabet, because it seems likely that this lawsuit, which has galvanized support for Google Fiber in the area, will move the market from the list of cities it's considering to the ones it plans to enter.
The article Here's How AT&T Is Fighting Google Fiber's Expansion Plans originally appeared on Fool.com.
Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Daniel Kline has no position in any stocks mentioned. He probably needs to eat more fiber. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Alphabet (A shares) and Alphabet (C shares). Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright 1995 - 2016 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.