Continue Reading Below
The former headquarters of Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust. Image source: Wikimedia Commons.
While most people associate the concept of "too big to fail" with the financial crisis of 2008-09, its origins actually date back to the 1984 government takeover of Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust. The nation's seventh-largest lender at the time, Continental Illinois found itself on the brink of failure after a series of strategic missteps caused creditors to pull funding from the bank.
Former Continental Illinois executive James McCollom recounted the Chicago bank's downfall in The Continental Affair: The Rise and Fall of the Continental Illinois Bank. What follows are five things I learned from the book, as well as from an FDIC analysis of the bank's demise:
1. Today's darlings are tomorrow's pariahs
In the years before Continental Illinois was nationalized, it was heralded as one of the best companies -- not just banks -- in the country. From an FDIC report noting the irony:
A 1978 article in Dun's Review pronounced the bank one of the top five companies in the nation; an analyst at First Boston Corp. praised Continental, noting that it had "superior management at the top, and its management is very deep"; in 1981, a Salomon Brothers analyst echoed this sentiment, calling Continental "one of the finest money-center banks going." Continental's share price reflected the high opinions of and performance by the bank. In 1979, an article noted that while the stocks of other big banking companies have hardly budged, "...Continental's ... has doubled in price -- rising from about $13 to $27 ... since the end of 1974, compared with a 10% gain for the average money-center bank."
Continue Reading Below
2. Rapid growth is a red flag
In an excellent history of banking and money in the United States, Money of the Mind, James Grant wrote that:
Growth at an exceptional rate is a red flag in banking. It is hard enough to manage an ordinary bank; to control a sprouting weed is well-nigh impossible. If loans are expanding too quickly, the lending officers have probably been saying 'yes' too frequently.
This perfectly captures the situation at Continental Illinois. Between 1976 and 1981, it expanded at a faster rate than any other bank in its peer group, increasing assets by 111%. Even more emblematic of its subsequent troubles, it expanded its portfolio of commercial and industrial loans by 180% over the same five-year stretch.
3. High profits often precede a fall
With the first two points in mind, it should come as little surprise that record profits oftentimes also precede a fall. In Continental Illinois' case, it was the second-most profitable bank in its peer group from 1977 to 1981.
4. The perils of relying on "hot money"
The fastest way for a bank to fail is to rely on "hot money" -- namely, short-term loans from the money market, brokered deposits, and large institutional deposits from abroad. A run on the latter led to Continental's failure.
5. Rumors alone can bring down even the biggest of banks
While Continental Illinois was guilty of mismanagement, that alone didn't kill the bank. The culprit stemmed instead from an unfounded rumor published by Reuters claiming the bank was on the verge of declaring bankruptcy.
The rumor, telexed into trading pits around the world, unsettled institutional depositors in Japan, who pulled their funds from the bank and, in doing so, triggered a broad-based run on Continental Illinois' funding. Over the next two weeks, the bank lost billions of dollars in deposits and money market funds, had to tap the Federal Reserve's discount window to stay afloat, and ultimately had to be taken over by the FDIC lest the nation's seventh-largest bank fail.
The article 5 Lessons from Americas First Too-Big-To-Fail Bank originally appeared on Fool.com.
John Maxfield has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple and Bank of America. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Bank of America. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright 1995 - 2015 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.