Retailers' Troubles Leave U.S. Lenders Largely Unscathed -- WSJ

By Lillian Rizzo and Rachel Louise Ensign Features Dow Jones Newswires

When oil prices tumbled to multiyear lows in 2016, the pressure quickly spread to banks that lent to energy companies.

Continue Reading Below

This year, a far different story is playing out for banks as the U.S. retailing industry endures a major shake-up that has led to a spike in bankruptcy filings.

Changing shopper habits and the increasing dominance of Amazon.com Inc. have led retail bankruptcies to hit their fastest pace since the financial crisis -- 21 this year through Tuesday, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. In recent months, retailers Payless ShoeSource Inc., BCBG Max Azria Group LLC and Limited Stores Co. have all filed for bankruptcy.

While many of these companies are saddled with a variety of debt, the "asset-based loans" popular with banks are among the safest. That is because the loans are typically backed by stores' inventories or accounts-receivable.

Banks have made asset-based loans to 15 of the 21 retailers that filed for bankruptcy since the beginning of 2017, according to a Wall Street Journal review of court filings and the S&P data. But those loans are all repaid or expected to be repaid, according to bankruptcy documents.

That has led bank executives and other industry observers to shrug off the risks these distressed retailers pose. The industry's troubles are "bad for retail, but not so bad for banks," said Glenn Schorr, a bank analyst at Evercore ISI.

Continue Reading Below

On a conference call last month, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive James Dimon played down the risks of retailers to the nation's largest bank. "There'll be something there, but it's nothing that will be dramatic when it's happening," he said, adding that J.P. Morgan has scrutinized its exposure to retailers, as well as property occupied by them and vendors who sell to them.

Still, the troubled industry has the potential to cause other headaches, particularly for smaller banks that do a lot of commercial real-estate lending.

"This issue clearly isn't going away," Christopher E. McGratty, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Inc., said recently. He expects smaller banks, some with 20% of their commercial real-estate exposure focused on retailers, will start to give more disclosure soon on different types of borrowers they serve, from strip malls to big-box stores.

Overall, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods estimates that banks have $270 billion of retail-related commercial real-estate loans.

Banks have taken on some of their most direct exposure to retailers through asset-based loans, which typically get paid back before those to other lenders. Asset-based "lenders historically have recovered 100% of their exposure" in retail bankruptcies, said David M. Hillman, a restructuring partner at Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP.

Commercial loans to retailers are larger than energy exposure at many banks. Retailers represent Bank of America Corp.'s third-biggest industry exposure in its commercial-lending book, for instance, and the bank extended $41.6 billion to the sector at the end of 2016. By contrast, the bank lent $19.7 billion to the energy industry.

Bank of America or Wells Fargo & Co. were lenders in nine of the 21 recent retail bankruptcies. The two banks have also lent money to troubled retailers that haven't filed for bankruptcy protection, like Sears Corp. and BonTon Stores Inc.

Banks generally take reserves against potential losses when they see borrowers that might be at risk. In the case of retailers, the amounts generally haven't been big enough to show up in broader reserve levels at big banks, Mr. Schorr said. That is a contrast to last year, when energy lending led banks to post large increases in reserves broadly.

One reason for the difference: In energy, the commodity-price declines were felt widely across the industry. Loans to troubled retailers, on the other hand, are balanced out by online stores and other chains that are performing better.

Another distinction is that the value of the retailers' collateral underlying the loans has held up better than in energy. "The inventory and accounts receivable value doesn't fluctuate as much as commodities' prices do," Mr. Hillman said.

This month's bankruptcy filing of rue21 Inc., a teen retailer, exemplified how banks' loans can be safe even when other lenders face losses. The retailer, which sells everything from prom dresses to candles for different astrological signs, had a $72 million loan led by Bank of America.

That loan is expected to be paid back in full from the proceeds of liquidation sales of about 400 of its nearly 1,200 stores in coming months, according to the proposed restructuring agreement.

Unlike many other retailers, rue21's debt goes beyond what is owed to banks, landlords and vendors. The Pennsylvania retailer owes $521 million on a so-called term loan owned largely by hedge funds. Instead of getting paid back relatively quickly, those lenders plan to swap their debt for equity in a reorganized company. There is also $250 million worth of rue21's unsecured bonds, whose holders are slated to get a 4% equity stake, as well as the right to pursue certain legal actions, if they vote "yes" to the proposed reorganization.

Write to Lillian Rizzo at Lillian.Rizzo@wsj.com and Rachel Louise Ensign at rachel.ensign@wsj.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

May 30, 2017 02:47 ET (06:47 GMT)