FOX Translator

Detach

No data currently available.

No data currently available.

Balance Sheet

Whether you're walking a tightrope or scribbling in your checkbook, balance is a good thing. And, one of the best ways to evaluate a company is to glance at its balance sheet to see what it owns with what it owes.

The balance sheet is a paragon of simplicity and is made up of three components: assets (the stuff it owns), liabilities (the money it owes), and shareholders' equity (the company's value to its shareholders).

Assets take two forms: short-term (or current) assets and long-term assets. Under short-term, there¿s good ol' hard cash. Then, there¿s something called "cash equivalents," which are assets like short-term bonds that can be sold so quickly, they might as well be cash. There you factor in inventory, which (if you're a reasonably competent business owner) you can sell to customers in return for--you guessed it--cash. (The raw materials a company owns to make that inventory also falls under this category.)

Long-term assets are things that are harder to convert into cash. (Think real estate and equipment.) Long-term assets depreciate, meaning they lose some value over time. Also under the long-term category are what's called intangible assets: things like patents and brands, that are important, but hard to quantify. Accountants earn their stripes figuring out the real overall value of these assets.

Once you know your assets, it's time for liabilities. As with assets, liabilities are separated into short-term or current, and long-term. Current liabilities are what a company owes in that year: Things like payments to employees or accounts payable to suppliers. Long-term liabilities are debts paid over several years.

Shareholders' equity is determined by subtracting the liabilities from the assets. That number represents the value of the company after all its bills are paid.

Obviously, investors should pay close attention to balance sheets. Spikes in the amount of debt carried, or a reduction in shareholders' equity, are usually red flags.

Home / Personal Finance / On Topic / Sports

'March Madness' Host Cities Should Cheer for Away Teams, Economists Say

 
Kathryn Glass
FOXBusiness
 

The thrill of getting to watch March Madness firsthand is undoubtedly a fun and exciting event for the residents of any city. But when city officials argue that hosting the NCAA tournament will bring economic benefits, sports economists take exception.

Circumstances have to be just so for host cities to make money—and those circumstances usually do not include having local teams compete close to home.
    
“My personal research has shown that in general, mega events don’t result in big returns back to host cities, and that the impact is not as great as the boosters suggest,” said Victor Matheson, a sports economist at Holy Cross University who has studied the economic impact of the NCAA tournament.

For cities, hosting an NCAA tournament sounds like a dream. Games are typically played in front of sold-out crowds and the ample TV coverage the tournament attracts can generate lots of positive press. Couple those benefits with the characteristic frenetic energy that defines the first couple of rounds of March Madness and it’s easy to see why host cities think they’re getting a sweet deal.

Cities that have hosted the first two rounds of the tournament say the competitive energy is palpable--especially if they’re lucky enough to host a team that’s playing close to home.  

 

Market Snapshot

Symbol Last Price Netchange Volume
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --