Home / Personal Finance / Lifestyle & Money
Friday, May 23, 2008
Backyard Barbecues Grill the Wallet
Mark Lieberman, Senior Economist
FOXBusiness
So, high gasoline prices forced you to change your plans and cancel that driving trip for the long Memorial Day weekend. You decided the 61.3¢ increase in the price of a gallon of gasoline since last year – a 21.5% bump – was a bit too much to handle, and figured you’d throw your first barbecue of the season instead.
You picked the menu: burgers, chicken, salads, soda, beer, potato chips, ice cream, cookies. Now, hold on to your wallet: that simple stay-at-home barbecue will cost about 7% more than it did last year.
That’s the math based on prices tracked by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In fact, the jump in the price of a simple Memorial Day barbecue over last year was the steepest in the last ten years. And get this, over that span the price of your barbecues fixins is up almost 33%.
The cost of the Fox Business Barbecue rose slightly faster than overall food inflation during the past year. Food prices are up about 5% from April 2007 to April 2008, according to the BLS data. In the last ten years, food prices are up just under 32%.
The cost of your barbecue was driven up primarily by an increase in, respectively, the price of: potato chips, up 11.5% in the last year; ice cream, up just under 11%; and soda, up just over 10%. Some of the increases are due to the higher cost of grain – used to feed the cows which produce the milk for the ice cream – as well as the corn syrup used to sweeten both the soda and the ice cream, a consequence of higher gasoline prices and ethanol supplements.
Here are details of some of the items on the menu for our Fox Memorial Day Barbecue, comparing costs this year, last year and ten years ago.
- The cost of a burger (meat, bun and cheese) this year is $2.59, up 18¢ or 7.5% from last year and 82¢ or 46.3% since 1998
- The cost of an individual serving of potato chips is 38¢, up 4¢ or 11.8% in the last year and 7¢ or 22.6% in since 1998
- The cost of soda is up 9.4% in the last year and 25% since 1998
- Ice cream soared almost 11% in the last year and 36.6% since 1998
- One traditional barbecue item remains a relative bargain: beer is up just 0.9% in the last year but 33.3% in the last ten years
The cost of the fixins is only one element in barbecue economics. In the last year, prices rose faster than average hourly earnings, which means it would take the average worker about a minute longer to earn the cost of the barbecue (per person) than it did last year. Over the longer term, the analysis is brighter: compared with 1998, it would take the average wage-earner a minute-and-a-half less time to earn the cost of a barbecue today as average hourly earnings rose faster during that time than the cost of food.
Fox Business Intern Adam Samson contributed to this report.
Mark Lieberman is the senior economist for the Fox Business Network. Prior to joining FOX, he served as first vice president at Washington Mutual, where he was manager of economic analysis and research. Before that, he served as senior vice president at Dime Savings Bank of New York (which was later acquired by Washington Mutual), where he specialized in credit and risk management. He has a degree in Economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.
The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.
The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.
But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.
Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.






