Home / Markets
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Treasury to Help Liquidate Money Market Firm's Fund
Dunstan Prial
FOXBusiness
The Treasury Department said Thursday it has reached an agreement with money market firm the Reserve Fund to assist in liquidating one of the firm’s funds.
The firm shook the financial world in September when news broke that one of its funds had “broken the buck,” meaning the value of its shares had fallen below $1, an extremely rare occurrence.
A few days later, after a rush of redemptions by Reserve Fund investors, the company suspended redemptions on orders from the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Under the Treasury plan announced Thursday, which targets the Reserve Fund’s U.S. Government Fund, the fund has 45 days to sell assets.
After that, Treasury can purchase any remaining securities at amortized cost, so that shareholders are paid back $1 for every share they own and the fund does not “break the buck.”
Treasury said its total exposure is $5.6 billion.
“This extraordinary action is in response to the unique situation of (Reserve Fund’s) money market fund,” Treasury said in a statement.
In the wake of the Reserve Fund redemptions, Treasury set up a program to backstop all investments in money market funds.
Treasury said no other funds participating in that program have been forced by the SEC to suspend redemptions.
Fox Business Video
-
-
AIG Bonus Approval
-
Jul 11, 2009
AIG Bonuses
-
-
-
Power Rankings: Where are They Now?
-
Jul 11, 2009
07/10/09
-
-
-
Macrellus Willey: Life After F...
-
Jul 11, 2009
Wiley on Networking Site
-
-
-
When a Dome Becomes a Home
-
Jul 10, 2009
Kubley on Dome Homes
-
-
-
Helping Small Business
-
Jul 10, 2009
Yancey on Volunteer Work
-
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
It's time to let you in on a dirty little secret: You may not own the stock you own. That's right, if you invest with a brokerage firm, the shares you bought are almost certainly not held in your name. Technically, they're held in the name of the Wall Street firm you do business with, hence the term "street name."
No, you haven't been robbed. Ultimately, the decision to hold shares on the books under a different name doesn't affect the economic ramifications for you. You¿re listed as the "beneficial owner," even though the firm is the official owner of the shares. But, you are giving up some rights, and investors concerned about good corporate governance might want to get that stock back in their own names.
Here's the problem: If your stock is technically owned by, say, Merrill Lynch, then Merrill Lynch gets to do things with it that might work against your wishes. Take short selling. Investors who want to sell shares short need to first borrow those shares. The lenders are often the big Wall Street firms that are handing out Street-name shares. So, if you feel that a company you own is a victim of aggressive short selling, chances are your own shares are being used to fuel the shorting.
Also, your brokerage firm can cast ballots on some corporate matters affecting a company without getting your input. Technically, this can only happen in votes considered ¿routine¿ by securities regulators. But, there's a big catch: some big events, like board elections, are considered "routine" under law.
The good news is that you can easily fix the Street name problem: Just request that your brokerage firm makes you the listed owner of the shares. If they refuse, find a new firm.






