Home / Markets
Monday, November 17, 2008
SEC Charges Dallas Mavericks Owner Mark Cuban With Insider Trading
Matt Egan
FOXBusiness

The Securities and Exchange Commission charged billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban with insider trading on Monday, alleging he used non-public information to avoid a $750,000 loss on his stake in search engine Mamma.com in 2004.
The SEC alleges Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks and one of the richest men in the world, sold his 600,000 shares of the company on the basis of “material, non-public information” concerning an impending stock offering that would have diluted his investment.
As of May 2007, Forbes estimated Cuban's net worth at $2.3 billion.
“Insider trading cases are a high priority for the commission. This case demonstrates yet again that the commission will aggressively pursue illegal insider trading whenever it occurs,” said Linda Chatman Thomsen, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement in a statement.
In a press release, Cuban's attorneys said he plans to fight the case, which they say has "no merit and is a product of gross abuse of prosecutorial discretion."
- Charles Whitehead, Cornell Law School and Securities Expert
Cuban responded defiantly, saying: "I am disappointed that the commission chose to bring this case based upon its enforcement staff’s win-at-any-cost ambitions. The staff’s process was result-oriented, facts be damned. The government's claims are false and they will be proven to be so.”
In a posting at his blog entitled "The SEC," Cuban added, "I wish I could say more, but I will have to leave it to this, and let the judicial process do its job."
The case had been pending before the SEC for nearly two years, Cuban's attorneys said.
According to the SEC complaint, Mamma.com execs said Cuban “flew off the handle” when he learned the company was about to conduct a PIPE, a private sale of illiquid stock that occurs at a discount to market prices.
“Well, now I’m screwed. I can’t sell,” Cuban told the Mamma.com exec, according to the SEC complaint. However, knowing the offering would be dilutive to existing shareholders, Cuban called his broker within hours and instructed him to sell his entire position in the company, the SEC claims.
Cuban had agreed to participate in the stock offering only after pledging to keep the information confidential, the SEC
said.
“As we allege in the complaint, Mamma.com entrusted Mr. Cuban with nonpublic information after he promised to keep the information
confidential,” said Scott W. Friestad, deputy director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement in a statement.
“Less than four hours later, Mr. Cuban betrayed that trust by placing an order to sell all of his shares. It is fundamentally unfair for someone to use access to nonpublic information to improperly gain an edge on the market.”
|
Rise to Billions |
|
In 1990, Cuban sold MicroSolutions to CompuServe—then a subsidiary of H&R Block—for $6 million. He retained approximately $2 million after taxes on the deal. |
|
In 1995, Cuban and fellow Indiana University alumnus Todd Wagner started Audionet, combining their mutual interest in college basketball and Webcasting |
|
In 1998, with a single server and ISDN line, Audionet became Broadcast.com. |
|
In 1999, Broadcast.com was acquired by Yahoo! for $5.7 billion in Yahoo! stock. |
|
In 2000, Cuban purchased a majority stake in the NBA Dallas Mavericks basketball team for $285 million from H. Ross Perot, Jr. |
|
Source: Forbes |
The SEC is seeking a court judgment that Cuban violated provisions of federal securities laws and unspecified financial penalties including restitution of the losses he allegedly avoided.
Mamma.com, which has changed its name to Copernic (CNIC), did not respond to request for comment. The Mavericks organization declined to comment.
“We don’t comment on matters such as these," said Mike Bass, the NBA's senior vice president of marketing communications.
"By filing against Mr. Cuban, they are sending a very clear signal. The warning shot is fired. Other shareholders of other corporations now need to be careful trading on this kind of information," said Charles Whitehead, a visiting law professor at Cornell Law School and securities expert.
At the time of the sale, Cuban was the largest known shareholder of Mamma.com, a Montreal-based company.
Cuban becomes the latest high-profile individual landing in hot water related to alleged insider trading. In 2004, Martha Stewart was convicted of obstructing justice and lying to the government for well-timed stock sales, sending the celebrity to prison for several months.
The SEC has successfully prosecuted a number of hedge funds in recent years for insider trading related to PIPE sales, or private investment in public equity. These transactions allow companies to quickly raise capital without needing to register new stock with the SEC.
However, they also harm common shareholders because they are sold at a discount since they can't be traded until they are listed with the SEC. Cuban told the Mamma.com exec that he did not like PIPEs for this reason, the SEC complaint alleges.
In addition to his ownership role with the Mavericks, Cuban is co-owner of 2929 Entertainment, chairman and president at HDNet and co-owner of HDNet films.
Click here to see the actual document
Fox Business Video
-
-
Helping Veterans Land Jobs
-
Jul 2, 2009
Baird on Helping Soldiers
-
-
-
President's Plans Working
-
Jul 2, 2009
Goodstein on Stimulus Success
-
-
-
Jackson Lives On
-
Jul 2, 2009
Beck on Future of Jackson
-
-
-
$20 Dollars a Gallon
-
Jul 2, 2009
Paying More to Save Economy
-
-
-
Looking for the Road to Recovery
-
Jul 2, 2009
Morris on Unemployment
-
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.
The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.
The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.
But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.
Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.






