Existing users please login

 

Home / Markets

Lower Housing Revenues Plague KB Home in Q4

 
Lauren Covello
FOXBusiness
     
    Home Builders [276]

    Struggling under the weight of the nation’s housing woes, KB Home (KBH) reported a worse-than-expected loss in the fourth quarter and said it expects market conditions to remain difficult or deteriorate further in 2009.

    The Los Angeles-based home builder posted a sharply narrower net loss of $307.3 million, or $3.96 a share, in the quarter ended Nov. 30, from $772.7 million, or $9.99 a share, in the same period the prior year.

    Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters were expecting a loss of $1.23 per share on revenue of $792.8 million.

    Dwindling demand, mounting foreclosures and stricter loan standards helped push the company’s revenue down to $919 million from $2.07 billion in the year-ago period -- a 56% plunge. The company said the decline was also due in part to “strategic reductions” in its number of active selling communities.

    Orders for homes during the fourth-quarter fell 52% from 8,132 to 3,912 on lower demand. At the same time, the company saw its average home sale price slide 6% to $232,200 from $247,800.

    With no “meaningful recovery” in sight, KB Home’s President and Chief Executive Jeffrey Mezger said the home-building industry could continue to suffer or worsen in 2009. Still, he believes the company has the right business strategies and liquidity position to be able to weather the storm -- though a hand from the government wouldn’t be rejected.

    “While we welcome appropriate federal stimulus to support the housing market, we are not counting on it or passively waiting for better times,” he said.

    KB Home, which had delivered 23,743 homes at an average price of $236,400 in fiscal 2007, delivered only 12,438 homes in fiscal 2008 at an average price of $261,600.

    The company ended the year with losses of $976.1 million, or $12.59 a share, from $929.4 million, or $12.04 per share, in 2007. Its full-year revenue fell 53% to $3.03 billion from $6.42 billion the year prior.

    Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters were expecting losses of $9.47 a share on revenue of $2.9 billion.

     

    Fox Business Video


     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    Street Name

    It's time to let you in on a dirty little secret: You may not own the stock you own. That's right, if you invest with a brokerage firm, the shares you bought are almost certainly not held in your name. Technically, they're held in the name of the Wall Street firm you do business with, hence the term "street name."

    No, you haven't been robbed. Ultimately, the decision to hold shares on the books under a different name doesn't affect the economic ramifications for you. You¿re listed as the "beneficial owner," even though the firm is the official owner of the shares. But, you are giving up some rights, and investors concerned about good corporate governance might want to get that stock back in their own names.

    Here's the problem: If your stock is technically owned by, say, Merrill Lynch, then Merrill Lynch gets to do things with it that might work against your wishes. Take short selling. Investors who want to sell shares short need to first borrow those shares. The lenders are often the big Wall Street firms that are handing out Street-name shares. So, if you feel that a company you own is a victim of aggressive short selling, chances are your own shares are being used to fuel the shorting.

    Also, your brokerage firm can cast ballots on some corporate matters affecting a company without getting your input. Technically, this can only happen in votes considered ¿routine¿ by securities regulators. But, there's a big catch: some big events, like board elections, are considered "routine" under law.

    The good news is that you can easily fix the Street name problem: Just request that your brokerage firm makes you the listed owner of the shares. If they refuse, find a new firm.