FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
TITLE
We like to think that when we deposit a dollar at the bank, it goes into a big vault and we can pull out that same dollar at any time. But that¿s not how the U.S. banking system works. Banks take that money and invest it to make money themselves, so cash gets spread around. This, naturally, leads to a big risk: What happens if those investments go sour? Well, you¿d be out of luck. You can¿t get your dollar back.
The Federal Reserve doesn¿t like that scenario, so it prohibits banks from putting all the cash it has on deposit on the line. In fact, the Fed forces banks to keep a portion of their assets at the Federal Reserve itself, to make sure that some of your assets won¿t get squandered if the bank¿s bets go south. These are called ¿reserves,¿ (hence, Federal Reserve. Got it? Good), and usually amount to 10% of the total cash kept in checking accounts.
These reserves are never exactly 10%, and banks like to keep a little extra in reserve ¿ not, as you might think, to make you more comfortable that they¿re in good financial shape, but rather so they can take that excess and lend it to other banks and make money off it. (They¿re banks, they can¿t help themselves.) The rate at which they make these loans is called the Federal Funds rate, which is set by the Federal Reserve¿s Federal Open Market Committee.
When you hear people chattering about how the Fed cut or hiked interest rates, this is what they¿re talking about: the interest rate banks can charge for lending money from their reserves. This begs the question: If these are essentially loans between banks, why is the Fed Funds rate so important for the rest of the economy?
Well, simply put, because loans make the financial world go round. Bank A lends Bank B $10,000 at a Fed Funds rate of 5%. Bank B then lends out $10,000 to a small business at 7%. The small business then takes that money and expands the business and hires new workers. Now someone is employed, Bank B has made interest off the loan, and Bank A is the richer for making it all happen. It¿s perhaps overly simplistic, but you get the idea. When you want the economy to thrive, you make lending cheaper.
Of course, sometimes you don¿t want the economy to thrive. In fact, you might want it to cool down, mostly to avoid money flooding the system and causing inflation. In that case, the Fed raises interest rates, making it difficult to lend or borrow.
Home / Markets / Industries / Technology
Monday, May 05, 2008
Microsoft's Gates Says Company is Focused On Independent Strategy
Donna Fuscaldo
FOXBusiness

Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) Chairman Bill Gates said Monday the company is focusing on an independent strategy after walking away from its hostile bid for Yahoo (YHOO) over the weekend.
During an exclusive interview with Gates and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) Chief Executive Warren Buffett on the Fox Business Network, Gates said Microsoft is “pursuing an independent strategy. That’s where the focus is and obviously we have a strong competitor in that category so we need to do breakthrough software.”
On Saturday Microsoft announced it would no longer pursue Yahoo, after Yahoo spurned the company’s $47.5 billion offer. Some industry watchers think that if Yahoo stock price falls Microsoft could step back in and try again to buy the Internet Company.
Recently shares of Yahoo were trading down 14.13% or $4.05 to $24.62 while Microsoft’s stock was recently up 0.64% or 18 cents to $29.42.
Speculation is also swirling that Microsoft could make another Internet acquisition with published reports saying Microsoft could buy News Corp.’s (NWS) MySpace, Time Warner’s (TWX) AOL, Facebook or LinkedIn.
During the interview with Gates and Buffet, Gates defended the volatility of Microsoft’s stock and the performance of CEO Steve Ballmer.
“Steve has done a fantastic job,” said Gates. “If you take what’s happened to the earnings and sales since he’s been CEO, its well more than doubled.”
During a subsequent interview with Yahoo President Susan Decker, Decker told Fox Business Network she wasn't disappointed that a deal didn't happen.
""It’s not about disappointment or not, it’s truly about our board has been very consistent and thoughtful about trying to maximize shareholder value, and it just came down to that. There was a difference between the bid and the ask and the two companies just didn’t come to terms," she said.
Both Gates and Decker sit on the Berkshire Hathaway board.
Market Snapshot
| Symbol | Last Price | Netchange | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |



