Existing users please login

 

Home / Markets / Industries / Technology

Blockbuster Withdraws Bid for Circuit City

 
Associated Press
     
    Blockbuster Store

    NEW YORK--Blockbuster Inc. said Tuesday it is withdrawing its proposal to buy Circuit City Stores Inc., the big-box electronics retailer whose sales have tumbled this year.

    Chief Executive James Keyes said in a written statement that the proposed deal, at a price of more than $1 billion, didn't make sense because of market conditions. Blockbuster shares jumped nearly 12% on the news, while Circuit City (CC) shares continued their fall.

    Blockbuster (BBI), the nation's largest movie-rental chain, will still try to merge content such as movies and games with the sale of electronic devices under one roof _ but it will be at Blockbuster's own stores, Keyes said.

    Circuit City Chief Executive Philip J. Schoonover said his board was still exploring strategies to help shareholders, which he said didn't require Blockbuster's presence.

    The retailer's stock has dropped below $3 from its peak near $31 in May 2006, and the shares have lost about half their value since a one-day rally spurred by Blockbuster's bid. Blockbuster shares have fallen 20% since the bid was announced in April.

    "Clearly Blockbuster shareholders didn't favor this deal," said Michael Pachter, an analyst with Wedbush Morgan Securities. "The company has done everything right since Jim Keyes took over, except making this bid. ... Circuit City's business is just plain in trouble."

    Dallas-based Blockbuster had offered at least $1 billion for Circuit City and planned to create a 9,300-store chain.
    Blockbuster went public with its offer after its initial overtures were ignored by Circuit City's board. Eventually, the Richmond, Va.-based company agreed to open its books to Blockbuster.

    But the deal --a marriage of two companies that each lost money last year _ was viewed with skepticism by many investors. Pressure on Blockbuster to walk away grew in June, when Circuit City reported that its loss tripled and same-store sales plunged 11% in the quarter that ended May 31.

    It was a difficult period for other retailers too, but Circuit City's performance was worse than rival Best Buy Co., which saw its profit decline in the same period by 7%.

    As of May 31, Circuit City operated nearly 700 U.S. stores and had 775 stores and dealer outlets in Canada. In its last fiscal year, it lost $320 million on sales of $11.7 billion.

    Blockbuster has more than 7,700 stores worldwide. It lost $85 million last year on revenue of $5.54 billion.

    The rental chain faces tough competition from the mail-delivery service of Netflix Inc. and cheap DVDs for sale at discounters such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc.(WMT). Since Keyes was hired last year, Blockbuster has moved to cut costs and limit losses in its online service, Total Access.

    Before news of Blockbuster's decision, shares in the movie-rental chain rose a penny to close at $2.51. In after-hours trading, they rose 29 cents, or 11.6%, to $2.80.

    Circuit City shares fell 34 cents, or 11.8%, to $2.55 in regular trading--skidding to a 52-week low of $2.47 during the day. 

    They dropped another 35 cents, or 13.7%, to $2.20 after-hours.

     

    Fox Business Video


     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    No-Load Funds

    Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.

    The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.

    The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.

    But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.

    Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.