Existing users please login

 

Home / Markets / Industries / Technology

Analyst Upbeat on Macworld Despite Apple CEO Jobs

 
Associated Press
     

    NEW YORK--The annual Macworld conference this week should bolster Apple Inc.'s (AAPLE) shares by shoring up confidence in the company's long-term strategy despite the absence of Steve Jobs, a Thomas Weisel Partners analyst said Monday.

    Analyst Doug Reid said he expects a "solid performance" from Phil Schiller, an Apple marketing executive tapped to give the company's keynote address Tuesday.

    And he said the presentation -- likely to include updates to the Mac Mini and "victory laps" around the new online iPhone application store -- should convince investors that the company can succeed with Jobs in a diminished role.

    Speculation about Apple and its chief executive has been intense since the Cupertino, Calif., company said last month that this year's conference would be its last and that Jobs will not make his usual presentation, an annual staple in the technology industry.

    Like Reid, some analysts have said the conference should highlight the company's ability to innovate and grow sales without Jobs as its public face. Others have cast doubt on Apple's long-term future without him.

    Reid reiterated his "Overweight" rating on Apple shares and a 12-month price target of $160.

    Apple shares jumped 21 cents in premarket trading on Monday to $90.96.

     

    Fox Business Video


     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    Street Name

    It's time to let you in on a dirty little secret: You may not own the stock you own. That's right, if you invest with a brokerage firm, the shares you bought are almost certainly not held in your name. Technically, they're held in the name of the Wall Street firm you do business with, hence the term "street name."

    No, you haven't been robbed. Ultimately, the decision to hold shares on the books under a different name doesn't affect the economic ramifications for you. You¿re listed as the "beneficial owner," even though the firm is the official owner of the shares. But, you are giving up some rights, and investors concerned about good corporate governance might want to get that stock back in their own names.

    Here's the problem: If your stock is technically owned by, say, Merrill Lynch, then Merrill Lynch gets to do things with it that might work against your wishes. Take short selling. Investors who want to sell shares short need to first borrow those shares. The lenders are often the big Wall Street firms that are handing out Street-name shares. So, if you feel that a company you own is a victim of aggressive short selling, chances are your own shares are being used to fuel the shorting.

    Also, your brokerage firm can cast ballots on some corporate matters affecting a company without getting your input. Technically, this can only happen in votes considered ¿routine¿ by securities regulators. But, there's a big catch: some big events, like board elections, are considered "routine" under law.

    The good news is that you can easily fix the Street name problem: Just request that your brokerage firm makes you the listed owner of the shares. If they refuse, find a new firm.