Home / Markets / Industries / Retail
Thursday, November 06, 2008
Blockbuster Reports Narrower-Than-Expected Loss
Erik Berte
FOXBusiness

Blockbuster (BBI) reported a loss that narrowly beat analyst expectations in the wake of slowed consumer spending.
“We are pleased with our third quarter results, particularly in light of the unusually limited slate of movie titles and strong viewership of the Olympics during the period. Key initiatives around merchandise assortment, in-stock availability and expense reduction allowed us to deliver our third consecutive quarter of positive domestic same-store sales and reduce our net loss by over 48%," said Jim Keyes, Blockbuster Chairman and CEO
The company reported a loss of $17.8 million, or 11 cents per share. This is a 48.3% improvement over the $34.4 million loss reported in the third quarter of last year. Analysts, according to Thomson Reuters data, were expecting a loss of 16 cents per share.
The company also reported sales of $1.20 billion, a decrease of 2.7% from $1.24 billion last year. Analysts were expecting $1.27 billion.
The company’s losses were cushioned by a 35.1% increase in domestic merchandise sales, particularly with video games. Merchandise sales were reported at $127.5 million, compared to $94.4 million in the same quarter of last year.
Rental revenue, however, was $680 million, down from $734.2 million last year.
According to a Reuters report, Blockbuster is testing new pricing for its rental offerings in its stores, including a subscription plan that would allow customers to rent as many movies as they wanted each month.
Competing rental services have popped up over the last few years -- such as Netflix (NFLX), which recently announced the ability to stream movies and TV shows directly to TiVo (TIVO).
Blockbuster has expanded its own operations into the digital realm by acquiring Movielink.com and integrating it into its own site.
This service lets customers download movies for rental or purchase directly on their computers.
Blockbuster Spokesman Randy Hargrove recently told FOXBusiness.com that the company has an advantage over the rent-by-mail services because it is “the only company that offers the ability to rent in-store or by mail and through Blockbuster Total Access, customers have the ability to exchange their by-mail movies in-store for free movie rentals and discounted game rentals.”
Fox Business Video
-
-
AIG Bonus Approval
-
Jul 11, 2009
AIG Bonuses
-
-
-
Power Rankings: Where are They Now?
-
Jul 11, 2009
07/10/09
-
-
-
Macrellus Willey: Life After F...
-
Jul 11, 2009
Wiley on Networking Site
-
-
-
When a Dome Becomes a Home
-
Jul 10, 2009
Kubley on Dome Homes
-
-
-
Helping Small Business
-
Jul 10, 2009
Yancey on Volunteer Work
-
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
It's time to let you in on a dirty little secret: You may not own the stock you own. That's right, if you invest with a brokerage firm, the shares you bought are almost certainly not held in your name. Technically, they're held in the name of the Wall Street firm you do business with, hence the term "street name."
No, you haven't been robbed. Ultimately, the decision to hold shares on the books under a different name doesn't affect the economic ramifications for you. You¿re listed as the "beneficial owner," even though the firm is the official owner of the shares. But, you are giving up some rights, and investors concerned about good corporate governance might want to get that stock back in their own names.
Here's the problem: If your stock is technically owned by, say, Merrill Lynch, then Merrill Lynch gets to do things with it that might work against your wishes. Take short selling. Investors who want to sell shares short need to first borrow those shares. The lenders are often the big Wall Street firms that are handing out Street-name shares. So, if you feel that a company you own is a victim of aggressive short selling, chances are your own shares are being used to fuel the shorting.
Also, your brokerage firm can cast ballots on some corporate matters affecting a company without getting your input. Technically, this can only happen in votes considered ¿routine¿ by securities regulators. But, there's a big catch: some big events, like board elections, are considered "routine" under law.
The good news is that you can easily fix the Street name problem: Just request that your brokerage firm makes you the listed owner of the shares. If they refuse, find a new firm.






