Home / Markets / Industries / Government
Friday, July 11, 2008
NYTimes: Government Considering Takeover of Freddie, Fannie
Ken Sweet
FOXBusiness
Shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were poised to plunge on Friday after The New York Times reported the government is considering taking control of the two mortgage companies.
Senior Bush administration officials told The Times that the government has a plan to place Freddie, (FRE) or Fannie (FNM) or both into a conservatorship if the companies reach insolvency.
Both Freddie and Fannie’s stocks were down more than 50% in pre-market action.
According to The Times, the government would guarantee the any liabilities of the two mortgage companies. However, in a conservatorship. it would make the companies' stock worth effectively nothing.
The White House declined to comment on the Times' story Friday morning.
Freddie and Fannie are government-sponsored mortgage companies which purchase mortgage from banks, package them into securities and sell them to investors. Congress created the two companies decades ago to promote home ownership. The consensus on Wall Street is that while Freddie and Fannie are publicly traded companies, the government provides an implicit guarantee on the company’s debt.
The government is also considering legislation that would offer an explicit government guarantee on the $5 trillion of debt owned or guaranteed by the companies. If the government guaranteed the companyies' debt, it would effectively double the size of the national debt, The Times reported.
Shares of Freddie and Fannie have taken a beating this week, losing more than 75% of their value each, on concerns that the two companies were reaching the point of insolvency and would have to raise massive amounts of capital. Analysts at Lehman Brothers said on Monday that the two companies would have to raise as much as $75 billion in additional capital to break even.
The companies’ cost of borrowing — their lifeblood for buying mortgages – has effectively doubled from a month ago as well.
Fox Business Video
-
-
Helping Veterans Land Jobs
-
Jul 2, 2009
Baird on Helping Soldiers
-
-
-
President's Plans Working
-
Jul 2, 2009
Goodstein on Stimulus Success
-
-
-
Jackson Lives On
-
Jul 2, 2009
Beck on Future of Jackson
-
-
-
$20 Dollars a Gallon
-
Jul 2, 2009
Paying More to Save Economy
-
-
-
Looking for the Road to Recovery
-
Jul 2, 2009
Morris on Unemployment
-
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.
The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.
The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.
But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.
Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.






