Existing users please login

 

Home / Markets / Industries / Finance

Prosecutors Aim to Appeal Madoff Bail Decision

 
Kathryn Glass
FOXBusiness
     

    If federal prosecutors have their way, a decision to keep disgraced financier Bernie Madoff on house arrest could be overturned.

    On Monday, federal prosecutors said they would appeal a ruling by US. Magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis to revoke accused Ponzi scheme mastermind Bernard Madoff’s bail -- a ruling that leaves Madoff on house arrest in his $7 million Manhattan apartment until trial.

    "The government intends to appeal the (magistrate) court's order to the district court," Acting U.S. Attorney Lev Dassin wrote in a letter to the judge.

    Earlier on Monday, the judge ruled that prosecutors had failed to convince him that Madoff represented either a flight risk or a danger to society.

    Click here to read the full ruling

    The judge added some conditions to Madoff's bail, however, including that all off the personal items in Madoff's apartment be itemized and the list turned over to prosecutors to prevent him from shedding valuable assets.

    Madoff was arrested on Dec. 11 and charged with one count of securities fraud. He is accused of bilking investors, many of them Jewish charities, of possibly $50 billion.

    Prosecutors last week sought to have Madoff jailed after the disgraced financier mailed expensive jewelry and other items reportedly worth more than $1 million to family members around Christmastime.

    The U.S. Attorney’s office, which is prosecuting the case, accused Madoff of trying to unload expensive items that might one day be used to repay victims who lost money in the alleged scheme.
    Noting the high-profile nature of the case and the charged atmosphere surrounding the accusations against Madoff, the judge differentiated between emotion and the law.
    “The issue at this stage of the criminal proceedings is not whether Madoff has been charged in perhaps the largest Ponzi scheme ever, nor whether Madoff’s alleged actions should result in his widespread approbation by the public, nor even what is appropriate punishment after conviction,” the judge wrote.

    The government simply failed to prove the crux of their case: that no set of bail conditions could ensure both that Madoff would appear in court and also keep the community safe.

    “Because the government has failed to meet its legal burden, the motion is denied,” the judge wrote.

    Later in the ruling, Ellis wrote, "Aside from the bare assertion that there remains some risk of flight, the government has failed to articulate any flaw in the current conditions of release."

    Madoff is electronically monitored and his apartment is being watched by a team of security guards. He and his wife have turned in their passports.

    The judge also ruled that the list of personal property in Madoff's Upper East Side Manhattan apartment be checked every two weeks by government investigators.

    In addition, the judge ruled that restrictions on transfer of all property will be officially included as a requirement of Madoff’s bail.

    The judge also mandated that Madoff’s outgoing mail be searched to confirm that no property is being transferred in the future.

    Madoff’s attorneys called the mailing of gifts a mistake and argued that Madoff is not a danger to the community or a flight risk.

    Madoff’s attorney, Ira Sorkin told FOX Business Network on Monday, “the decision speaks for itself and we intend to comply with the order.”

     

    Fox Business Video


     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    SYMBOL

     
    Trade Deficit

    Everyone would agree they see more "Made in Taiwan/China/Japan/etc..."tags than "Made in the USA" tags for the past several years. Well, that "Made in _____" tag on your clothing has an economic term sewn into it: trade deficit. A trade deficit happens when one country buys more goods than it sells to other countries.

    For example, if the entire United States (all 300 million of us) made only 100 shirts this year, and if all of China made 100 shirts, some of those shirts would be traded between us- we would sell a few to China, and vice versa. But a trade deficit happens when one country sells more shirts than another. China, in this example, could sell 85 shirts to America. The U.S. could sell 55 shirts to China. So, in this trade, China sold more shirts to the United States, 30 more in fact.

    Most businessmen and economists believe that most trade deficits aren't a bad thing; it's just part of trade, and at some point trade between two countries should balance out eventually.

    The big exception is the U.S., which buys vastly more stuff than it sells, and has done so for decades.

    Why does this matter? Well, in order to buy those shirts, you need money. And if you are buying more shirts than you're selling shirts, you're losing money. If you're a business, you won't be in business much longer.

    But, countries aren't businesses. They are, well, countries, and can print all the money they want. People who deal with currencies, or each country's version of money, look at trade deficits as one way to find out how much each country's currency is worth. If you have to print more money, each dollar you print can possibly lower the value of the other dollars out there. Like stocks, you can buy and sell currencies on what's called the foreign-exchange market (or, if you want a buzzword for the office, say Forex market).

    Well, because the U.S. has been buying a lot of stuff from China for many, many years, China holds a lot of U.S. dollars. If China were to sell those dollars on the market at some point, well, it wouldn't be very good. The U.S. dollar's value would fall -- making imports and traveling abroad much more expensive.

    Trade deficits are usually a good thing, because it shows that the global economy is working. It's just when a trade imbalance gets too high where economists and investors start to become concerned.