Home / Markets / Industries / Finance
Monday, October 06, 2008
Citigroup Files Suit Against Wells Fargo, Wachovia
Dunstan Prial
FOXBusiness
Citigroup, Wachovia and Wells Fargo called a temporary truce Monday, several hours after Citigroup sued the other two seeking $60 billion in damages.
The three banks, working with the Federal Reserve, released a statement just after the close of the U.S. stock markets saying they would halt all litigation against each other until noon on Wednesday.
Litigation has been virtually non-stop since Friday when Wells Fargo (WFC) upended a government-brokered deal that allowed Citigroup (C) to buy faltering Wachovia’s (WB) banking assets for $2.1 billion.
Early Friday Wells Fargo offered to pay $15.4 billion for all of Wachovia’s assets, and Wachovia agreed.
Citigroup immediately challenged the deal, saying its pact with Wachovia gave it “exclusive rights” to Wachovia’s assets.
The three spent all weekend battling various court orders and appeals.
Citigroup’s lawsuit filed Monday in New York State Supreme Court charges Wachovia with a “bad faith breach” of their earlier agreement.
Citigroup is seeking more than $20 billion in compensatory damages and more than $40 billion in punitive damages from Wells Fargo for “tortious interference” in Citigroup’s pact with Wachovia.
In a statement accompanying the suit, Citigroup said it agreed to “assist with a rescue” of Wachovia at the request of the government after Wells Fargo walked away from negotiations with Wachovia.
“Had an agreement between Citi and Wachovia not been reached on September 29, Wachovia would have failed the following day and the debt issued by its holding company would have collapsed with potentially devastating implications for the stability and security of the financial markets,” Citigroup’s statement said.
Citigroup said the deal would have benefited clients and shareholders of both Citigroup and Wachovia.
Instead the agreement was “subverted by the unlawful conduct of Wachovia, Wells Fargo” and their respective management teams, directors and advisors, according to Citigroup.
The lawsuit, no doubt marking the beginning of a protracted legal battle, would seem to be exactly what Federal Reserve officials are trying to avoid.
A report in The Wall Street Journal said the government is trying to negotiate a compromise between Citigroup and Wells Fargo in which Wachovia’s assets would be divided between the two dueling suitors.
Neither Citigroup nor the New York Federal Reserve responded to messages left seeking comment, but Monday’s statement reporting the truce seems to confirm that the three banks are working with the government to find a resolution.
Under a plan reportedly being discussed Sunday night, Citigroup and Wells Fargo would divide Wachovia’s 3,346 branches geographically. Citigroup would get the branches in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions, and Wells Fargo the Southeast and Western branches.
Citigroup said in its statement announcing the lawsuit that it “remains willing” to work out a deal with Wachovia.
In news first reported on Fox Business Network, Sheila Bair, chair of The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which brokered the deal between Citigroup and Wachovia, said she expects “a resolution” in the dispute today.
No further details were available, but she was likely referring to the litigation truce.
Analysts have said Wells Fargo’s deal favors taxpayers and Wachovia’s shareholders.
Derek Ferber, a research analyst at SNL Financial in Charlottesville, Va., said Friday that a Wachovia deal with Wells Fargo takes taxpayers off the hook for billions of dollars in potential losses to Wachovia’s mortgage related assets. Citigroup’s deal included guarantees by the FDIC for losses up to $42 billion.
In addition, Wachovia shareholders will get paid for their investments in a deal with Wells Fargo. Under the Citigroup deal, shareholders got nothing, Ferber said.
Wells Fargo said it will acquire all of Wachovia’s businesses and obligations, including its preferred equity, indebtedness and banking deposits. Boards of both Wells Fargo and Wachovia signed off on the deal.
Wells Fargo, which has managed the credit crisis better than many of its rivals, said it expects to incur $10 billion in merger and integration charges from the deal.
To help pay for the deal, Wells Fargo said it plans to raise $20 billion in a common stock offering.
Fox Business Video
-
-
Gene Cernan on One Small Step,...
-
Jul 17, 2009
Cernan on Importance of Moon Landing
-
-
-
CIT's Impact on Small Biz
-
Jul 17, 2009
What if CIT Fails?
-
-
-
Regulating Generic Drugs
-
Jul 17, 2009
Pharma Facing Regulatory Hurdles
-
-
-
Exclusive: Stanford Whistle Blower
-
Jul 16, 2009
Wydler on Stanford Financial Scheme
-
-
-
Congressional Grilling too Late?
-
Jul 16, 2009
Kucinich on Paulson Hearing
-
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
Each Thursday at 8:30 a.m. EST, the government tells us about how many people went through one of the most unpleasant experiences of their lives: filing for unemployment help for the first time. It's essentially a survey, since state unemployment is managed by your state, not the federal government.
The report runs like clockwork, but it¿s notoriously inaccurate. For one thing, the number often has wide swings from week to week, so it's a rare event for the figures to come in exactly as economists predict. Second, it is very seasonal. Folks like school bus drivers often file claims when summer comes around, and other people get retail jobs as the holidays approach. Some economists like to use it to handicap the big monthly employment situation report, but they often do so at their statistical peril
Sometimes, weekly jobless claims make political, rather than economic, noise. If there¿s a big spike in claims, some politicians will often cite the number as a sign the economic sky is falling. But, it's important to remember what the weekly jobless numbers don't tell you: you don't know how long these folks stay unemployed, how long they've been out of work in the first place, or even if they're truly out of work and not just trying to scam the government.
Because it's so unreliable, economists usually put the past four weeks together and look at a moving average. That gives a little better picture of the overall trend, but it's still not a great indicator.






