Existing users please login

 

Home / Markets / Industries / Finance

Bove: Goldman Sachs Revenue Dwindling

 
Associated Press
     

    NEW YORK -- Ladenburg Thalmann analyst Richard Bove on Monday reiterated a "sell" rating on Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and cut his full-year profit estimate on the investment bank, citing dwindling revenue sources.

    For the fiscal year ending November 30, Bove now expects earnings of $14.16 per share, down from a previous estimate of $15.45 per share.

    Analysts polled by Thomson Financial, on average, anticipate earnings of $16.77 per share in 2008.

    "Business has dried up," Bove wrote in a note to clients. "Key drivers of revenue such as investment banking, and mergers and acquisitions have simply not been happening enough to stimulate related business."

    Prime brokerage and foreign activity have also faltered. What's more, Bove said he expects performance fees from the asset management division to wane.

    Currency and commodities trading have prospered, but they are not enough to offset the other declining business segments, said Bove, who maintained a $154 target price on the stock.

    "At the moment, the light at the end of this tunnel is very dim," Bove said. "In near term, a turnaround in the company's earnings is not in prospect."

    A Goldman Sachs representative was not immediately available for comment.

    Goldman Sachs' shares rose $2.05 to close at $178.

     
     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    Marriage Penalty

    Sure, we know some of you are saying the term "marriage penalty" is redundant. In fact, of all the costs associated with getting married (have you seen the cost of a wedding cake lately?), the marriage penalty can be the worst.

    Here's how it works: Mr. and Mrs. Right walk down the aisle in wedded bliss and suddenly they¿re a two-income household. If both make roughly the same amount of money, they can be pushed into a higher tax bracket. That's bad, since the higher the bracket, the higher the tax. So, if both were single, they'd end up writing two smaller checks to the tax man that, if combined, would add up to less than the giant check they write in a state of wedded bliss.

    Is that fair? We're not touching that, but there is a flip side that few people talk about. The marriage penalty only kicks in if both members of the couple make close to the same amount of money. If there's a big disparity in pay, there's actually a tax advantage. Call it the marriage bonus.

    And, it¿s important to remember that there are other financial benefits, such as lower life-insurance rates or health care premiums, that can make up for the extra tax couples pay. So don't let Uncle Sam stop you from saying, "I do."