Existing users please login

 

Home / Markets / Industries / Energy

Oil Rebounds on Iran Missile Test, Inventory Data

 
Associated Press
     
    Oil Rig in Ocean w/ Clouds [276]

    Oil prices rose Wednesday after a government report showed U.S. crude stockpiles fell more than expected and Iran test-fired nine missiles, including a type capable of reaching Israel.

    Light, sweet crude for August delivery is up 71 cents at $136.75 a barrel in morning trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

    The gains follow two days of steep declines that left prices 6.4 percent below last week's record high.

    Figures from the Energy Information Administration showed U.S. oil supplies fell by 5.9 million barrels last week, a decline of 2 percent. That is far above the 1.9 million barrels forecast by analysts surveyed by the energy research firm Platts.

    However, gasoline stockpiles rose more than expected. Inventories of distillate fuel, which include diesel and heating oil, also rose, but less than analysts anticipated.

    Retail gasoline prices in the U.S. hovered at a record high just shy of $4.11 a gallon for the third straight day, according to auto club AAA, the Oil Price Information Service and Wright Express. Diesel prices at the pump rose by more than half a penny to a new high of $4.813 a gallon.

    Iran's Revolutionary Guards fired the missiles during war games that officials said were meant to show the key oil producer can retaliate against a U.S. or Israeli attack, state television reported.

    The barrage was said to include a new version of the Shahab-3 missile, which officials have said has a range of 1,250 miles. That makes it capable of striking Israel, Turkey, the Arabian peninsula, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

    Gen. Hossein Salami, a top commander, was quoted as saying the exercise "is to demonstrate our resolve and might against enemies who in recent weeks have threatened Iran with harsh language."

    A day earlier, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dismissed fears that Israel and the United States could be preparing to attack his country, calling the possibility a "funny joke."

    "Iran is certainly sending mixed signals," said Victor Shum at Purvin & Gertz in Singapore. "There was an apparent easing of tensions, but then the missile tests had an impact on prices today."

    Iran is the world's fourth-largest oil producer and OPEC's second-largest exporter. Oil traders fear any military conflict could prompt Iran to block the Strait of Hormuz, a passageway that handles about 40 percent of the world's tanker traffic.

    The declines earlier in the week dragged crude prices back to levels not seen since June 26. However, a number of analysts have cautioned that the sell-off might not represent a long-term shift in the bull ran that just last week drove prices past $145 a barrel.

    In Washington, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called on President Bush to open up the country's Strategic Petroleum Reserve in an effort to bring down prices she said "are helping push the economy toward recession." Bush repeatedly has rejected calls to use oil from the emergency government stockpile.

    In other Nymex trade, heating oil futures rose about 4 cents to $3.8609 a gallon while gasoline prices added nearly 2 cents to $3.3824 a gallon. Natural gas futures slipped 11.6 cents to $12.252 per 1,000 cubic feet.

    August Brent crude rose $1.02 to $137.45 a barrel on the ICE Futures exchange in London.

     

    Fox Business Video


     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    No-Load Funds

    Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.

    The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.

    The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.

    But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.

    Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.