Home / Markets
Friday, December 12, 2008
Up and Coming
All Eyes on the FOMC
Mark Lieberman, Senior Economist
FOXBusiness

The two-day meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee beginning Monday will be the focus in the upcoming week.
The FOMC will have a lot of economic news and data to chew on when it meets, most of it continuing to be negative, suggesting
the committee will vote to drop the target Fed Funds rate below 1.0% for the first time ever.
To be sure, not all of the news in the last week was bad. Friday, for example, brought word that the producer price index
grew at a subdued pace tamping inflationary expectations. And, Friday as well, the University of Michigan consumer sentiment
survey showed a slight improvement in consumer attitudes – but that improvement was driven by the “current conditions” index
and more reflected declines in gasoline prices and mortgage interest rates than optimism about economic conditions.
To the extent we could see optimism, it may have been in an otherwise negative report on retail sales for November – again
a brief snapshot. Yes, retail sales fell in November, but the report reflects actual prices paid and the price of a gallon
of gasoline, about 10% of all retail sales, continued to slide.
A less-followed but broader report Thursday on the economy – with an historic perspective – showed just how far the household
sector has slipped and been hurt in the lingering downturn. The report, the quarterly “Flow of Funds” tabulation by the Federal
Reserve, is a comprehensive look at the balance sheets of key sectors of the economy, including households, with detailed
information about the levels of household ownership of several types of assets, including government securities, mutual funds,
stocks, homes and levels of bank deposits and debt.
According to the most recent report, household assets fell for the fourth consecutive quarter for the first time since the
Fed started tracking the data in 1952.
The third quarter data suggested households are stretched further under the strain of falling home values and higher debt
as household leverage – measuring debt as a percentage of net worth – jumped to a record high with the steepest quarter-quarter
growth since 2003. The increase from 3Q 2007 was the highest year-year increase ever. These are not record worthy of boast.
The data also showed even though house values have fallen, homes still represent the largest share of household net worth
(assets less debt) at 15.1%, stock investments represent 12.8%, down from 13.8% in the second quarter and 15.7% just a year
ago. At their peak in 1968, stocks represented more than a quarter of household net worth.
Also important is that fact that retiring baby boomer household pension fund reserves fell for the fourth straight quarter
to the lowest level since 2005, suggesting older workers may try to extend employment.
On the corporate side, the report showed the “financing gap,” which is the difference between (non-financial) business capital
spending and available cash flow – thus measuring corporate needs – fell by more than 50% from the second quarter to the third,
a function of a drop in capital spending and businesses hoarding cash.
It is just that logjam the FOMC hopes to break in its meeting Tuesday even though previous attempts to prod credit markets
with interest rate cuts haven’t been successful.
There will be more than just the FOMC next week with a calendar stressing the manufacturing sector -- the December Empire
State Manufacturing Survey and November Industrial Production on Monday and the December Philadelphia Fed Survey on Friday.
Sandwiched between those reports will be the November Consumer Price Index report and data on November housing starts.
| Monday, December 15 | |
| Empire State Index (Nov) | |
| October actual: -25.4 DOWN 0.8 | |
| November consensus: -25.0 | |
| Industrial Production / Capacity Utilization (Nov) | |
| Industrial Production | |
| October actual: 107.3 UP 1.3 | |
| November consensus: 106.8 | |
| Capacity Utilization | |
| October actual: 76.4% UP 0.9 | |
| November consensus: 76.0% | |
| Housing Market Index (Dec) | |
| November actual: 9 | |
| December consensus: 10 | |
| First day of two-day FOMC Meeting | |
| Tuesday, December 16 | |
| Consumer Price Index (Nov / Y-Y Ch) | |
| Total | |
| October actual: DOWN 1.0% / 3.7% | |
| November consensus: DOWN 1.0% / 1.7% | |
| Core | |
| October actual: DOWN 0.1% / 2.2% | |
| November consensus: UP 0.1% / 2.1% | |
| Housing Permits and Starts (Nov) | |
| Permits | |
| October actual: 730,000 DOWN 9.3% | |
| November consensus: 700,000 DOWN 4.1% | |
| Starts | |
| October actual: 791,000 DOWN 4.5% | |
| November consensus: 745,000 DOWN 5.8% | |
| FOMC Interest Rate Decision | |
| October 29: 1.00% DOWN 0,50% | |
| November 16 consensus: 0.50% DOWN 0.50% | |
| Wednesday, December 17 | |
| MBA Application Index (Week ended: December 12) | |
| Week Ended December 5: 796.8 DOWN 7.1% | |
| Four-week moving average: 540.0 UP 26.8% | |
| No December 12 consensus | |
| Thursday, December 18 | |
| Unemployment Insurance Claims (Week Ended December 13) | |
| December 6 Actual: 573,000 UP 58,000 | |
| December 13 Consensus: 550,000 | |
| Four-week moving average: 540,500 UP 14,250 | |
| No December 13 consensus | |
| Leading Economic Indicators (Nov) | |
| October actual: 99.6 DOWN 0.8 | |
| November consensus: 99.1 | |
| Philadelphia Fed Index (Nov) | |
| October actual: 39.3 DOWN 1.8 | |
| November consensus: 38.3 | |
| Friday, December 19 | |
| No Data Releases |
Mark Lieberman is the senior economist for the Fox Business Network. Prior to joining FOX, he served as first vice president and manager of economic analysis and research at Washington Mutual in New York. Before that, he served as senior vice president at Dime Savings Bank of New York (which was later acquired by Washington Mutual), where he specialized in credit and risk management. He is a member of the Executive Committee of the New York Association for Business Economics. He has a degree in Economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.
The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.
The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.
But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.
Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.






