Existing users please login

 

Home / Markets

The Final Score

Expect a Revolt Against the Bailout

 
David Asman
FOXBusiness
     
    final score 276

    What happened last week won’t go away. A lot of politicians who went against the will of their voters were hoping it would all be forgotten by Election Day. But it won’t be forgotten. 

    That’s because the bailout obviously wasn’t a quick fix. As we saw again with this week's huge stock-market drop, the markets don’t behave the way politicians tell them to behave. Just like voters don’t behave the way politicians tell us to. For weeks, we’ve been told in a very condescending way that we didn’t understand this mess…that the “experts” know how to fix things better than we do. These are the same “experts” who were asleep at the wheel about monitoring Fannie and Freddie and all the worst culprits in this mess. And now these “experts” are telling us like children that we just don’t understand. In short, the politicians who helped get us in this mess are adding insult to injury as they’re engaging in the biggest money and power grab in my lifetime. 

    How could there not be a political uprising against this? Eventually, some politician or group of politicians will harness this discontent. Maybe it will be a true outsider…someone like Howard Jarvis, who started a nationwide tax revolt in 1978. 

    But it will come. I have no doubt. And when it does, we will be closer to getting the People’s House and all our houses in order.

     

    Fox Business Video


     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    Street Name

    It's time to let you in on a dirty little secret: You may not own the stock you own. That's right, if you invest with a brokerage firm, the shares you bought are almost certainly not held in your name. Technically, they're held in the name of the Wall Street firm you do business with, hence the term "street name."

    No, you haven't been robbed. Ultimately, the decision to hold shares on the books under a different name doesn't affect the economic ramifications for you. You¿re listed as the "beneficial owner," even though the firm is the official owner of the shares. But, you are giving up some rights, and investors concerned about good corporate governance might want to get that stock back in their own names.

    Here's the problem: If your stock is technically owned by, say, Merrill Lynch, then Merrill Lynch gets to do things with it that might work against your wishes. Take short selling. Investors who want to sell shares short need to first borrow those shares. The lenders are often the big Wall Street firms that are handing out Street-name shares. So, if you feel that a company you own is a victim of aggressive short selling, chances are your own shares are being used to fuel the shorting.

    Also, your brokerage firm can cast ballots on some corporate matters affecting a company without getting your input. Technically, this can only happen in votes considered ¿routine¿ by securities regulators. But, there's a big catch: some big events, like board elections, are considered "routine" under law.

    The good news is that you can easily fix the Street name problem: Just request that your brokerage firm makes you the listed owner of the shares. If they refuse, find a new firm.