Existing users please login

 

Home / Markets / Economy

Record Weakness for Dollar on Rescue Plan

 
Matt Egan
FOXBusiness
     

    The dollar suffered record losses against the euro on Monday as the potential negative consequences of the government’s $700 billion rescue effort weighed heavily on the currency.

    The greenback's weakness helped push equities sharply lower, including a loss of 373 points on the Dow, and sent crude oil prices to its biggest one-day price increase ever.

    The dollar was down 2.33% to $1.4802 per euro as of 4:22 p.m. EDT. At its lows, the dollar was down to $1.4435 per euro, the lowest level since late August.

    The losses were the worst for the greenback against the euro since the European currency debuted in 1999.

    “It’s an indictment of what Ben Bernanke and Hank Paulson are trying to pull off," said Peter Boockvar, equity strategist at Miller Tabak. “People are realizing that the government’s plan is not necessarily going to be the answer.” 

    The Treasury’s $700 billion rescue would allow the government to buy and hold toxic assets currently stuck on banks’ balance sheets. The plan is aimed at restoring confidence in the financial system and allowing banks to return to lending to businesses and individuals.

    Pushing the nation’s debt level to new heights is among several potentially negative consequences of the massive bailout. Purchasing the illiquid assets from banks could push the government’s debt ceiling up by 6.6%. Even before the Treasury plan emerged, the Congressional Budget Office was already forecasting a budget deficit of $438 billion for the next fiscal year.

    There remains considerable uncertainty about the final structure of the $700 billion rescue effort that began to take shape last Friday. Congressional leaders have said a vote could come on the package by the end of the week, but Democrats have pushed for new provisions such as help for homeowners and curbs on executive compensation, and the process could extent into the next week. 

    Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., has sought to include provisions that would give the government equity in financial companies if their toxic assets lose value and cause the government to take a loss.

    The dollar has also been hurt by raised expectations that the Federal Reserve will increase interest rates before the end of the year. The new hopes for a rate cut have been fueled by the latest turmoil in the financial sector, including the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers (LEH) and an $85 billion emergency loan to American International Group (AIG). 

    An interest rate cut would have negative consequences for the already-weakened greenback. The Fed has slashed interest rates by 3.25 percentage points since a year ago as the economy has slowed. 

     

    Fox Business Video


     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    No-Load Funds

    Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.

    The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.

    The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.

    But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.

    Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.