Home / Markets / Economy
Sunday, July 13, 2008
Federal Regulators Outline Plan for Fannie, Freddie
FOXBusiness
Federal regulators announced sweeping moves to shore up the finances of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Sunday, with the government offering a range of ways the troubled mortgage companies could tap capital.
The Federal Reserve board said it had authorized borrowing from its special discount window that allows banks and investment banks to borrow from the Fed at 2.25%. Before the Bear Stearns collapse in March, even investment banks weren’t allowed to tap that window. Historically, the discount window was a lender of last resort to traditional banks.
"This authorization is intended to supplement the Treasury's existing lending authority and to help ensure the ability of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to promote the availability of home mortgage credit during a period of stress in financial markets," the Fed said in a statement. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York will manage the facility.
The Treasury Department added that it would try to increase the amount of credit it could extend to Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE). The current credit line is $2.25 billion apiece. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson will determine how much credit to extend.
Treasury will also be authorized to buy equity in both companies, if needed.
The moves came because Treasury believed shoring up both Fannie and Freddie “is important to maintaining confidence and stability in our financial system and our financial markets,” Paulson said in a statement.
Treasury’s moves need Congressional approval, which the department said is expected this week.
Moves by the regulators come a day before Freddie Mac was scheduled to sell $3 billion in three- and six-month debt to raise capital. After the Treasury announcement, Freddie Mac chief executive Richard Syron said the company “is adequately capitalized, has a large liquidity portfolio and access to the world's debt markets.”
Freddie is in the process of finalizing its quarterly results and the company said “they will show we have a substantial capital cushion above the 20% mandatory target surplus established by our regulator,” Syron said. “We expect the results will also show that we have a much greater surplus above the statutory minimum capital requirement. The company's capital and liquidity resources will enable it to continue to serve its public mission as it has always done.”
For its part, Fannie Mae “appreciates today's announcements and the expressions of support for the GSEs as shareholder-owned companies that play a critical role in the U.S. housing finance system,” Daniel Mudd, Fannie’s chief executive, said in a statement.
“Given the market turmoil, having options to access provisional sources of liquidity if needed will help to strengthen overall confidence in the market,” Mudd said.
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.
The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.
The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.
But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.
Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.






