Existing users please login

 

Home / Markets / Economy

Doom and Gloom: Consumer Confidence Tumbles

 
Associated Press
     
    shopping wallet 276

    NEW YORK--Amid the gloom of higher gas and food prices and a slumping housing market, Americans appear to be looking for a bit of hope.

    Their outlook has brightened a bit, even though they remain the most gloomy about the current economy that they have been in 16 years, a private research group said Tuesday.

    The New York-based Conference Board said that its Consumer Confidence Index stands at 51.9 for July -- half of what it was a year ago -- but the reading was slightly higher than the revised 51.0 in June and a bit better than the reading of 50 predicted by economists surveyed by Thomson/IFR. The improvement, albeit slight, also reverses a six-month slide since February.

    The Expectations Index, which measures shoppers' outlook over the next six months, increased a bit to 43.0 from 41.4. The Present Situation Index, which measures their current assessment of the economy, was virtually flat at 65.3, compared to 65.4 in June.

    "Consumers' assessment of current conditions was little changed, suggesting there has been no significant improvement, nor significant deterioration, in business or labor market conditions," said Lynn Franco, director of The Conference Board Consumer Research Center, in a statement.

    She added, however, that while consumers remain grim about short-term prospects, the modest improvement in their outlook provides some glimmer of hope. The slight improvement in the outlook "bears careful watching over the next few months," she said.

    Economists closely monitor sentiment as consumer spending represents about two-thirds of all economic activity. The reading comes as the nation's retailers are entering the critical back-to-school season, the most important period behind the holiday season.

    Stocks rose Tuesday, rebounding a day after a big tumble, on the improving confidence. The Dow Jones industrial average rose 111.45, or 1.04% to 11,246.53 in midmorning trading.

    But there was more bad news about housing Tuesday. The S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city index fell 15.8% in May from a year earlier, the sharpest drop since its inception in 2000. The narrower 10-city index was down 16.9%, its biggest drop in its 21-year history.

    And the Consumer Confidence report -- derived from responses received through July 22 of a representative sample of 5,000 U.S. households -- showed that consumers' worries about business conditions and jobs aren't going away. Those saying jobs are "hard to get" edged up to 30.3% from 29.7% in June, while those claiming jobs are "plentiful" declined to 13.5% from 14.1%.

    Consumers' outlook, while slightly improving from last month, continues to be grim.

    Those anticipating business conditions to worsen over the next six months did ease a bit to 32.4% from 33.5%, while those expecting conditions to improve edged up to 9.3% from 8.5% in June. But the% of consumers expecting fewer jobs in the months ahead increased to 37.1% from 35.7%, while those anticipating more jobs remained virtually unchanged at 8.2%.

    Another worry is a slowing job market, because job security is key to consumers' willingness to spend. Cautious employers, uncertain about the economy and their own sales prospects, have cut jobs each month so far this year. Economists are bracing for more job losses when the government releases the employment report for July on Friday.

    Economists expect payrolls to drop by 72,000 in July, which would mark deeper cuts than the 62,000 logged in June. The unemployment rate, now at 5.5%, probably will climb to 5.6%. The jobless rate is expected to keep moving higher this year and next, hitting 6% or more early next year.

    The Consumer Confidence survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.

     

    Fox Business Video


     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    No-Load Funds

    Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.

    The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.

    The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.

    But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.

    Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.