FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
TITLE
Sounds kind of dirty, right? Actually, it's because of a clean visual that technical analysts use this term. Technical analysts like charts (hence their nickname of "chartists"), and they like to give certain patterns they see neat little names.
Such is the case with the double bottom, which looks on a chart like, well, a double bottom. Think of three mountains (on a chart reflecting a rise in values) separated by two valleys (representing dips in value). The troughs of the valleys, and the size of the first two peaks, are generally the same, so the chart looks like the letter 'W.' The appearance of those two valleys represents a double bottom.
So what? Well, if you're one of those folks who believes in the power of the charts, seeing a double bottom suggests a long-term trend is about to reverse. So, if a stock chart shows shares falling for several months, then seeing a double bottom, chances are good (according to the chartists) that the shares will rise. And vice versa.
But, beware: charts can be a great tool, but they're more art than science. Use any charts with caution.
Home / Markets / Economy
Friday, February 29, 2008
Auto Enrollment Makes 401(k)s Easy, but Experts Say it’s Not Enough
Kathryn Glass
FOXBusiness
Automatic enrollment in 401(k) plans makes saving for retirement a breeze by automatically diverting a small portion of
new employees' salaries to the plan. But if you think by placing your retirement planning in the hands of your employer will
prepare you for your golden years, experts said you'll probably come up short.
Since the enactment of the Pension Protection Act [PPA] in 2006, the number of large employers offering automatic 401(k) enrollment has increased about 19% since 2005, to about 34% in 2007, according to Hewitt Associates, a human resources consulting firm based outside of Chicago. That's a clear step in the right direction; few would argue that an increase in the number of employees contributing to their 401(k) plans is bad thing. The average contribution rate employees are automatically enrolled in is about 4.5% of their salary, and while that is certainly better than nothing, it might not be enough.
Click here to read "Young, Broke but Aiming to Advance? Try a Roth 401(k)
“Four-and-a half percent in total is not going to give you a good retirement,"
said Anthony Webb, a research economist at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. "I guess that 4.5% is better
than nothing, but it’s certainly not going to get you where you want to be.”
This prompts the question of why employers
are automatically enrolling their employees at such a low rate, especially since studies show employees are unlikely to drop
out of automatic enrollment plans when their contributions are automatically increased.
Michael Doshier, vice president
of marketing for Fidelity Retirement Services said the number of employees who drop out of automatically enrolled 401(k) plans
is between 1% and 9%. Of all the starting deferral rates, more people increase their deferral rates as a next step when
6% is selected as the default compared to a 3% default.
Since increasing contribution rates seems to
have a positive impact on the amount of employee participation, it’s unclear why employers would be reluctant to raise default
contribution rates.
One hypothesis has to do with the fact that before the Pension Protection Act or PPA was signed
into law, many employers feared that automatically enrolling employees in a savings program could violate some state laws,
or that they might be exposed to liability if the stock market were to go down and employee contributions lost value. There
was also some concern that employees would demand automatically contributed funds be returned to them, which would be difficult
for employers to do because of 401(k) withdrawal restrictions. Now that those issues have been dealt with, more employers
are offering automatic enrollment, although there is still some hesitation to automatically enroll employees at a high contribution
rate.
"The
original ruling that defined and approved automatic enrollment back in 1998 used 3% as an illustration of how automatic enrollment
works,” said Mark Iwry, who directed the issuance of the ruling when he was serving as an official at the Treasury Department.
“There were subsequent rulings that made clear that 3% was not a requirement, only an example, but much of the
corporate community tended to stick relatively close to the terms of that [original] ruling, ” said Iwry who is now
the nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and managing director of the Retirement Security Project.
The
nonprofit Retirement Security Project and many others have since recommended the default contribution rate be automatically
increased over time; thus, the employee who was automatically contributing 3% in the first year of employment would be contributing
4% in the second year, 5% in the third, and so on until the contribution rate reached a level designated by the plan.
That idea is beginning to catch on.
A study done by the Center for Retirement Research in 2006 showed 39% percent
of the companies that had already used automatic enrollment had also added automatic escalation features. But that data was
collected before the PPA, and there is reason to believe the number of employers offering automatic escalation will be much
higher now.
Another reason some companies have been slow to automatically enroll employees at high contribution rates
is because it adds a significant amount of cost.
“They have to think about match dollars,” Doshier of Fidelity said.
“If you go from 70% 401(k) participation to 90%, then that’s a big jump. Most plan sponsors would rather ease into this
with a multi-year strategy. They’d rather go in with the 3% and then slowly do the automatic increase.”
Sixty
percent of Vanguard plan sponsors are either already offering automatic escalation, or they automatically enroll employees
at a rate of 6% with a 4% company match, said Steve Utkus, director of the Vanguard Center for Retirement Research. He thinks
the bigger issue is getting more firms to adopt auto enrollment and to get the firms that have adopted it to auto-enroll existing
employees, not just new hires.
Regardless, employees currently enrolled at a low default contribution rate should consider
upping the amount. Experts said contributing between 9% and 12% of your total salary is a much more realistic way to get your
retirement savings on track.
“We guide employers to go to 10%,” Doshier said. “If you save 10% over time, that’s a
number that will substantially contribute to retirement.”
Market Snapshot
| Symbol | Last Price | Netchange | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |



