Home / Markets / Business Leaders
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Bernanke: Obama Stimulus Would Lift Economy
Kathryn Elizabeth Tuggle
FOXBusiness

On Tuesday morning, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke addressed the London School of Economics in London, offering thoughts on the Federal Reserve’s responses to the economic crisis and the stimulus package being developed by President-elect Barack Obama.
Bernanke began by highlighting the “extraordinary stress” the global financial system has been under for the last year and a half, saying that the “proximate cause” of the crisis was the turn of the housing cycle in the U.S., and the subsequent rise in subprime mortgage delinquencies.
He said that Obama’s substantial fiscal package could provide a “significant boost" to a damaged economy. However, he warned that fiscal actions such as these are unlikely to bring long term stabilization to the system.
"History demonstrates conclusively that a modern economy cannot grow if its financial system is not operating effectively,” Bernanke said.
This speech marked the first time Bernanke has addressed Obama’s $800 billion recovery plan. Obama, who will be inaugurated next week, hopes to boost government spending with the stimulus plan, and may include some tax cuts.
Although Bernanke did not comment on the details of Obama’s stimulus plan, he said that “more capital injections and guarantees may become necessary" to bring stability to the markets.
“I believe that the Fed still has powerful tools at its disposal to fight the financial crisis and the economic downturn,” Bernanke said. “Even though the overnight federal funds rate cannot be reduced meaningfully further.”
Bernanke said that even as the country recovers from the current financial crisis, it must also work toward preventing future ones.
"A clear lesson of the recent period is that the world is too interconnected for nations to go it alone in their economic, financial and regulatory policies," he said. "International cooperation is thus essential if we are to address the crisis successfully and provide the basis for a healthy, sustained recovery.
He also noted that companies considered "too big to fail" must be willing to submit to increased regulatory scrutiny, noting that one of the biggest problems of the financial crisis has been that those large institutions took such big risks.
Fox Business Video
-
-
Helping Veterans Land Jobs
-
Jul 2, 2009
Baird on Helping Soldiers
-
-
-
President's Plans Working
-
Jul 2, 2009
Goodstein on Stimulus Success
-
-
-
Jackson Lives On
-
Jul 2, 2009
Beck on Future of Jackson
-
-
-
$20 Dollars a Gallon
-
Jul 2, 2009
Paying More to Save Economy
-
-
-
Looking for the Road to Recovery
-
Jul 2, 2009
Morris on Unemployment
-
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
Sure, we know some of you are saying the term "marriage penalty" is redundant. In fact, of all the costs associated with getting married (have you seen the cost of a wedding cake lately?), the marriage penalty can be the worst.
Here's how it works: Mr. and Mrs. Right walk down the aisle in wedded bliss and suddenly they¿re a two-income household. If both make roughly the same amount of money, they can be pushed into a higher tax bracket. That's bad, since the higher the bracket, the higher the tax. So, if both were single, they'd end up writing two smaller checks to the tax man that, if combined, would add up to less than the giant check they write in a state of wedded bliss.
Is that fair? We're not touching that, but there is a flip side that few people talk about. The marriage penalty only kicks in if both members of the couple make close to the same amount of money. If there's a big disparity in pay, there's actually a tax advantage. Call it the marriage bonus.
And, it¿s important to remember that there are other financial benefits, such as lower life-insurance rates or health care premiums, that can make up for the extra tax couples pay. So don't let Uncle Sam stop you from saying, "I do."






