Home / Markets
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
AMR, Delta Earnings Show Scars of High Fuel Prices
FOXBusiness
![Delta Airlines [276]](/images/stories/delta_777.jpg)
High fuel prices battered the balance sheets of both AMR Corp. (AMR) and Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL) in the third quarter. But the sale of an investment business meant that AMR was able to report a profit for the three-month period, while Delta was left with a loss.
Delta announced a net loss of $50 million, or 13 cents a share, compared to a profit of $220 million, or 56 cents a share, in the year prior.
The company’s earnings missed Wall Street’s already lowered expectations, as analysts polled by Thomson Reuters estimated a profit of two cents per share. Delta’s revenue, however, came in at $5.72 billion, topping analysts’ forecasts of $5.69 billion.
The airline industry felt the blow of $140 oil prices this summer, and responded by raising fares, tacking on new fees and cutting capacity. The high cost of fuel led Delta’s operating expenses to jump to $814 million -- 17% over what they were in September 2007.
Delta’s Chief Executive, Richard Anderson, said the company’s “solid liquidity position” makes it well-positioned to weather the economic turmoil sweeping the financial markets. As the carrier looks to complete its “game-changing” merger with Northwest Airlines Corp. (NWA) in the fourth-quarter, Anderson expects greater sustainability and a “more durable financial future.”
The Atlanta-based carrier estimates its operating margin, excluding special items, will be 1% to 3% in the fourth-quarter and flat to 2% for the year as a whole.
While Delta had a turbulent third quarter, AMR came in with a smooth landing -- but just barely.
AMR’s net profit came in at $45 million, or 17 cents per share, bolstered by the $432 million sale of its investment business, American Beacon Advisors. Without the sale and other special items, the company’s net loss would have been $360 million, or $1.39 per share.
The Fort Worth, Texas-based carrier said its revenue climbed to $6.42 billion, topping analysts’ estimates of $6.34 billion.
While oil prices have fallen dramatically from where they were this summer, the company’s Chief Executive, Gerard Arpey, said he is concerned about how the economic climate will impact travel demand. AMR, the parent company of American Airlines, said it spent $1.1 billion more -- a 64% increase -- more on fuel prices than it did in the same period in 2007.
Arpey expects to cut capacity by 6% in 2009, which could push fares higher if other airlines do the same.
In a move that may help give its parent company more protection against rising fuel costs, American said Wednesday that it will upgrade its fleet with more fuel-efficient jets.
Fox Business Video
-
-
AIG Bonus Approval
-
Jul 11, 2009
AIG Bonuses
-
-
-
Power Rankings: Where are They Now?
-
Jul 11, 2009
07/10/09
-
-
-
Macrellus Willey: Life After F...
-
Jul 11, 2009
Wiley on Networking Site
-
-
-
When a Dome Becomes a Home
-
Jul 10, 2009
Kubley on Dome Homes
-
-
-
Helping Small Business
-
Jul 10, 2009
Yancey on Volunteer Work
-
FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
It's time to let you in on a dirty little secret: You may not own the stock you own. That's right, if you invest with a brokerage firm, the shares you bought are almost certainly not held in your name. Technically, they're held in the name of the Wall Street firm you do business with, hence the term "street name."
No, you haven't been robbed. Ultimately, the decision to hold shares on the books under a different name doesn't affect the economic ramifications for you. You¿re listed as the "beneficial owner," even though the firm is the official owner of the shares. But, you are giving up some rights, and investors concerned about good corporate governance might want to get that stock back in their own names.
Here's the problem: If your stock is technically owned by, say, Merrill Lynch, then Merrill Lynch gets to do things with it that might work against your wishes. Take short selling. Investors who want to sell shares short need to first borrow those shares. The lenders are often the big Wall Street firms that are handing out Street-name shares. So, if you feel that a company you own is a victim of aggressive short selling, chances are your own shares are being used to fuel the shorting.
Also, your brokerage firm can cast ballots on some corporate matters affecting a company without getting your input. Technically, this can only happen in votes considered ¿routine¿ by securities regulators. But, there's a big catch: some big events, like board elections, are considered "routine" under law.
The good news is that you can easily fix the Street name problem: Just request that your brokerage firm makes you the listed owner of the shares. If they refuse, find a new firm.






