FOX Translator

Detach

No data currently available.

No data currently available.

Federal Funds Rate

We like to think that when we deposit a dollar at the bank, it goes into a big vault and we can pull out that same dollar at any time. But that¿s not how the U.S. banking system works. Banks take that money and invest it to make money themselves, so cash gets spread around. This, naturally, leads to a big risk: What happens if those investments go sour? Well, you¿d be out of luck. You can¿t get your dollar back.

The Federal Reserve doesn¿t like that scenario, so it prohibits banks from putting all the cash it has on deposit on the line. In fact, the Fed forces banks to keep a portion of their assets at the Federal Reserve itself, to make sure that some of your assets won¿t get squandered if the bank¿s bets go south. These are called ¿reserves,¿ (hence, Federal Reserve. Got it? Good), and usually amount to 10% of the total cash kept in checking accounts.

These reserves are never exactly 10%, and banks like to keep a little extra in reserve ¿ not, as you might think, to make you more comfortable that they¿re in good financial shape, but rather so they can take that excess and lend it to other banks and make money off it. (They¿re banks, they can¿t help themselves.) The rate at which they make these loans is called the Federal Funds rate, which is set by the Federal Reserve¿s Federal Open Market Committee.

When you hear people chattering about how the Fed cut or hiked interest rates, this is what they¿re talking about: the interest rate banks can charge for lending money from their reserves. This begs the question: If these are essentially loans between banks, why is the Fed Funds rate so important for the rest of the economy?

Well, simply put, because loans make the financial world go round. Bank A lends Bank B $10,000 at a Fed Funds rate of 5%. Bank B then lends out $10,000 to a small business at 7%. The small business then takes that money and expands the business and hires new workers. Now someone is employed, Bank B has made interest off the loan, and Bank A is the richer for making it all happen. It¿s perhaps overly simplistic, but you get the idea. When you want the economy to thrive, you make lending cheaper.

Of course, sometimes you don¿t want the economy to thrive. In fact, you might want it to cool down, mostly to avoid money flooding the system and causing inflation. In that case, the Fed raises interest rates, making it difficult to lend or borrow.

Home

Kerry, Snowe Praise Sarbanes-Oxley Extension for Small Businesses

 
Comtex
 

WASHINGTON, June 20, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ ----After over a year of urging from Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine), today the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) agreed to provide small businesses with an additional one year extension to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b) auditor attestation requirements.

Last year, Kerry and Snowe held a hearing focusing on the impact of Sarbanes-Oxley regulations on small businesses and wrote three letters to the SEC seeking additional time for small firms to comply while preserving the intent of the 2002 law.

"The SEC made the right call by providing small businesses with additional time to comply with Sarbanes Oxley," said Senator Kerry, Chairman of the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. "Smaller firms continue to face higher costs in meeting these reporting requirements. After this extension, all public companies should fully comply with the law."

"I applaud the SEC for taking action to shield small businesses from the overly burdensome requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act," said Senator Snowe, the Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. "I am also pleased that the SEC will complete a study on the costs and benefits of applying the law to small businesses. The SEC should refrain from implementing any new regulations until such an evaluation is complete. Given the state of our economy, small businesses should be focused on innovation and job creation instead of complying with ill-conceived regulations."

Small firms worth less than $75 million face a higher burden than larger firms in complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley regulations. In 2006, restatements of financial results for large companies decreased by 20 percent, while restatements for the smaller firms increased by 42 percent due to the disproportionately higher cost and time needed to comply.

To read the letters Kerry and Snowe sent, go to: http://sbc.senate.gov/oversight/lettersout/070223-SECandPCAOBltr.pdf

http://sbc.senate.gov/oversight/lettersout/070508-SEC-PCAOB-HearingFollowUp.pdf

http://sbc.senate.gov/oversight/lettersout/070606-SEC-Sarbanes-OxleySection404Ltr.pdf

SOURCE U.S. Senate Committee on Small Business & Entrepreneurship

Copyright (C) 2008 PR Newswire.
   All rights reserved
 
 

Market Snapshot

Symbol Last Price Netchange Volume
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --