Existing users please login

 

Home

Important Progress Toward Control of Hepatitis B and C

 
Comtex
     

    MILAN, April 25, 2008 /PRNewswire via COMTEX News Network/ ----Scientists presenting at today's sessions of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) reported encouraging findings regarding the potential efficacy of treatment strategies using new drugs designed to combat hepatitis B and C.

    Notable progress has been made in clarifying the structure of the hepatitis C virus (HCV), leading to the development of new experimental drugs such as protease inhibitors and polymerase inhibitors, drugs that inhibit virus production. Some of these drugs have been extensively tested and some are currently in phase II trials. Phase III trials are planned. Based on results to date, it is clear that these drugs can be highly effective in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Novel anti-viral approaches at the preclinical developmental stage will also be presented.

    An important trend in HCV has emerged in the past 5 years across many parts of Europe. In the past, cases of chronic hepatitis C often went undiagnosed because physicians assumed that the HCV regimen involved severe side effects and was destined to fail in most cases. Now, typically, when physicians see patients with even minor alterations of liver function tests, they then test for HCV. This is because they have been convinced that these patients can be successfully treated. Ironically, a new problem arises... According to Dr. Antonio Craxi, Professor of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine at the University of Palermo, Italy, "Many physicians now have unreasonably optimistic expectations. Fifty percent of patients - generally those with the most severe disease -- will fail to respond to current therapy. They have more fibrosis, more advanced liver disease, more progressive conditions. The new small molecules, when combined with interferon and ribavirin may control their disease in a substantial number of cases. Future drugs will hopefully be more effective. And in several years combinations of 2 or 3 small inhibitor molecules may be administered without pegylated interferon. This is not feasible at the moment."

    There are now new, tested molecules that are effective in obtaining viral suppression in hepatitis B virus (HBV). When used in HBV, these new agents have a strong suppressive effect... but none can entirely eradicate the hepatitis B virus. Once the HBV infection is established, it has to be treated for many years... maybe for the patient's lifetime. A new problem then arises... each drug is only licensed for use in monotherapy. But when used as a single therapy, drug resistance will eventually occur. As a result, what physicians are currently doing is treating a large number of patients with the risk of selecting resistant mutations that will eventually spread in the exposed population. Thus they are treating HBV effectively in the short-term but may create a long-term problem. For this reason, future development will likely involve combinations of these molecules.

    The great unanswered HBV question at the moment is who should be treated? Because HBV treatment only contains rather than eliminates viral replication, once treatment stops, viral rebound can occur in a matter of days. So treatment has to be restarted, and continued for life. Currently, it is only feasible to treat those patients with severe progressive HBV, to prevent eventual cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. It is impractical to treat someone with HBV who is simply a healthy carrier, both because of the cost and because suppressing their viral infection may increase the likelihood of inducing a problematic mutation.

    About EASL

    The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) aims to promote investigation into liver disease and improve the treatments that currently exist for these conditions. The association, through its annual meetings, seeks to inform and educate both the scientific community as well as society in general about the increasing occurrence of liver diseases along with the importance of understanding these conditions in order to treat and prevent them. Since its creation in 1966, the EASL congress has been hosted in 20 different European countries. Currently the association has over 1400 members and the annual congress attracts over 6000 delegates from over 65 countries each year.

    SOURCE EASL - European Association for the Study of the Liver

    Copyright (C) 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved
     

    Fox Business Video


     

    FOX Translator

    Detach

    No data currently available.

    No data currently available.

    No-Load Funds

    Some mutual funds want you to pay for the privilege of them (or your investment adviser) taking your money to invest. It's called a load, and it works like a cover charge to get into a nightclub. Luckily, there are such things as no-load funds. As the name implies, shares of these funds are sold without a fee paid to a broker or investment advisor.

    The entire amount you invest in no-load funds goes to work for your returns. On the other hand, with load funds, right off the bat you're charged commission (not to mention other fees incurred over the life of the investment). Let's say, for example, you invest $25,000 into a load fund that charges a 5% commission. This costs you $1,250 off the top, bringing your actual investment down to only $23,750.

    The often-cited horse race analogy argues against investing in load funds. Here's the logic behind it: Would you place a bet on a horse that had to start a race 200 yards behind the others? Well, maybe you would if you got a tip from a sketchy, trench coat-clad man in a dark alley. However, under most circumstances, it's not smart to put your money on that handicapped horse.

    But some argue that at times that man in the trench coat (aka your broker) knows more about the horses than you do, and has a better shot at picking a winner. Also, sometimes these fees are unavoidable because some funds are available only through investment advisers.

    Cost-benefit analysis can help determine when a load fund is worth it (in other words, when it will score you a load) and when it is better to "do it yourself" and avoid the fees. Load-fund fees range depending on share class and can cover a variety of costs, such as paper work and fund management.