FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
We like to think that when we deposit a dollar at the bank, it goes into a big vault and we can pull out that same dollar at any time. But that¿s not how the U.S. banking system works. Banks take that money and invest it to make money themselves, so cash gets spread around. This, naturally, leads to a big risk: What happens if those investments go sour? Well, you¿d be out of luck. You can¿t get your dollar back.
The Federal Reserve doesn¿t like that scenario, so it prohibits banks from putting all the cash it has on deposit on the line. In fact, the Fed forces banks to keep a portion of their assets at the Federal Reserve itself, to make sure that some of your assets won¿t get squandered if the bank¿s bets go south. These are called ¿reserves,¿ (hence, Federal Reserve. Got it? Good), and usually amount to 10% of the total cash kept in checking accounts.
These reserves are never exactly 10%, and banks like to keep a little extra in reserve ¿ not, as you might think, to make you more comfortable that they¿re in good financial shape, but rather so they can take that excess and lend it to other banks and make money off it. (They¿re banks, they can¿t help themselves.) The rate at which they make these loans is called the Federal Funds rate, which is set by the Federal Reserve¿s Federal Open Market Committee.
When you hear people chattering about how the Fed cut or hiked interest rates, this is what they¿re talking about: the interest rate banks can charge for lending money from their reserves. This begs the question: If these are essentially loans between banks, why is the Fed Funds rate so important for the rest of the economy?
Well, simply put, because loans make the financial world go round. Bank A lends Bank B $10,000 at a Fed Funds rate of 5%. Bank B then lends out $10,000 to a small business at 7%. The small business then takes that money and expands the business and hires new workers. Now someone is employed, Bank B has made interest off the loan, and Bank A is the richer for making it all happen. It¿s perhaps overly simplistic, but you get the idea. When you want the economy to thrive, you make lending cheaper.
Of course, sometimes you don¿t want the economy to thrive. In fact, you might want it to cool down, mostly to avoid money flooding the system and causing inflation. In that case, the Fed raises interest rates, making it difficult to lend or borrow.
Home
Thursday, July 17, 2008
EPA Report Concludes Impacts of Climate Change will be Burden on Public Health System, Report Co-Author Says
Comtex
WASHINGTON, July 17, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ ----A report released today by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency concludes that the United States is likely to have the resources necessary to alleviate most direct health threats from climate change. However, the report also concludes there will be an additional burden on an already stretched public health system as a result of climate change.
"The nation needs to know how climate change will impact people's health within our own borders, and that additional public health protections will be needed to ensure our most vulnerable citizens are adequately protected," said Dr. John Balbus, chief health scientist for Environmental Defense Fund and a contributing author to the report.
The report, called Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.6, is one of 21 five-year updates required under the Climate Change Science Program on the scientific literature about the impacts of climate change on human health, welfare and settlements. It also assesses the nation's ability to adapt to climate change threats and where impacts may be greatest.
In addition, the report notes the nation is likely to experience worsened heat stress, the health effects of higher ozone concentrations resulting from higher temperatures, health impacts of floods and drought-related wildfires, and increased spread of water and food-borne illness. The most vulnerable populations and communities in the nation, those already experiencing a disproportionate burden of ill health, are likely to experience the greatest impacts from climate change as well.
Environmental Defense Fund has already released a report, "Are We Ready? Preparing for the Public Health Challenges of Climate Change," (http://www.edf.org/documents/7846_AreWeReady_April2008.pdf) which highlights the gaps in public health preparedness for climate change with a nationwide survey of public health departments.
Environmental Defense Fund, a leading national nonprofit organization, represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit www.edf.org.
CONTACT: Dr. John Balbus, +1-301-908-8186, jbalbus@edf.org, or Sean Crowley, +1-202-550-6524, scrowley@edf.org, both of Environmental Defense Fund
SOURCE Environmental Defense Fund
http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap4-6/final-report/
Copyright (C) 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved
Market Snapshot
| Symbol | Last Price | Netchange | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |






