FOX Translator
No data currently available.
No data currently available.
You're at a fruit market. But, instead of just being able to buy apples at this fruit market, you can also sell fruit.
You're not a farmer, so you come to the market to buy some apples and you see two fruit stands. Fruit Stand A on the left
is buying and selling apples at 50 cents apiece. However, Fruit Stand B on the right is buying and selling apples at 53 cents
apiece. People are buying and selling apples at these two stands all the time, and the price at a stand could change at any
moment. But, while you're there, apples are 50 cents and 53 cents, respectively.
You're a smart person, and you quickly
realize that you can buy apples from Stand A and then sell them across the street to Stand B and make a 3-cent profit. But
you have to do it now; you can't wait. So you buy all the apples at Stand A and then run to sell them all to Stand B.
Congratulations.
You've committed fruit-stand arbitrage.
Arbitrage is exactly that: the selling of the same item between two different
markets to make a profit off the mathematical differences in price. However, it's not apples that are traded--the goods in
question are usually stocks, currencies and other securities. Arbitrage happens when you get a stock, usually a common one
like General Electric that's traded on multiple markets (Japan, Hong Kong, U.S., etc¿). The stock is usually worth within
fractions of a penny the same on each of those markets. However, there are often some minor variations.
People who
participate in arbitrage take advantage of these variations--and make a ton of money doing it. As seen in the fruit stand
example, you can make a "riskless profit" from buying and selling apples between different markets.
There are some
big hedge funds that make almost all their money off arbitrage. But, despite this simple example, arbitrage is mathematically
complex--and involves a good portion of risk if you don't know what you're doing. You probably won't be able to participate
in arbitrage directly, but you can always invest in a mutual fund that does.
Home / Personal Finance / Financial Planning / Family & Estates
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Your Money Matters
Big News for Non-Spouse Beneficiaries
Gail Buckner, CFP
FOXBusiness
Attention: Daughters, Sons, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts, Siblings, Neighbors, Bosom Buddies, Unmarried Partners, et al!
Did
Cousin Ned name you the numero uno recipient of his 401(k) when he died? Has Aunt Beatrice bestowed upon you the title of
“beneficiary” of the 403(b) plan she had through her former school district?
Or, to come at this in reverse, have you
designated your daughter, brother, or household partner as the beneficiary of your company-sponsored retirement plan?
For
obvious reasons, all of the above individuals fall into the category of “non-spouse.” And, unlike a wife or husband who inherited
a spouse’s retirement plan, non-spouse beneficiaries have not been allowed to roll those assets into an IRA Instead, they
generally have been forced to empty the account and pay the income tax due within 5 years after the plan owner died.
The
Pension Protection Act (PPA), which was passed last year, was supposed to change that – but the IRS had a different interpretation
of the wording Congress used. Early this year it issued two notices (1) taking the position that a non-spouse beneficiary
who inherits a retirement plan can only roll it into an IRA if the sponsor of the retirement plan can accommodate this.
In
other words, if Dad’s 401(k) plan didn’t recognize non-spouse rollovers, his son Larry would be out of luck. Even if Larry
followed the rules to the letter, he couldn’t roll over the money in Dad’s account.
It was absurd: Congress clearly
wanted to give people the option of conserving this money; instead, the IRS put the power in the hands of each company sponsoring
a retirement plan!
The financial planning and retirement communities have been up in arms ever since the IRS issued
its interpretation of this provision. Thankfully, Congress heard about it, too, and decided to set the record straight in
follow-up legislation.
As a result, the IRS now says that starting Jan. 1st, every retirement plan sponsor must allow
a non-spouse beneficiary to roll over an inherited account.
Hallelujah!
According to Boston attorney Natalie
Choate, a nationally recognized expert on retirement plans, “Apparently when the IRS saw Congress’ technical corrections,
these made it clear enough that even the IRS could understand this is required effective 2008.” For this year, accommodating
a non-spouse rollover is optional for a plan.
Other than being able to postpone paying income tax on the lump sum that’s
inherited, why is this a big deal? Because when the assets are moved into an IRA, the potential gains they generate can continue
to grow for decades on a tax-deferred basis. Depending upon the amount of time and how the money is invested, compounding
can turn a modest inheritance into one worth more than a million bucks.
For instance, say grandma dies and leaves her
granddaughter, Milly, as beneficiary of her $30,000 IRA. Milly’s age in the year after grandma’s death is 6. According
to the IRS tables, Milly has a life expectancy of 82 additional years. Thus, to calculate her first required withdrawal Milly
will divide the value of the IRA by 82. The next year she’ll divide by 81, the next she’ll divide by 80, continuing to reduce
her life expectancy by one year.
Now, let’s assume the investments in the IRA earn 8% per year and that Milly only
takes out the minimum amount required each year. Thanks to the effects of compounding and tax-deferral, by the time she is
age 88, Milly will have received more than $2,000,000 from grandma’s $30,000 IRA!
But getting the retirement plan to
roll over the assets is just the beginning. There are very specific requirements that must be met in order to qualify:
1)
Don’t let Uncle Ned’s plan make out the check to you! It’s critical that the assets in Uncle Ned’s account be moved into what’s
called a “direct transfer,” that is, from the retirement plan to the IRA custodian.
The safest way to do this is to
have the retirement plan wire the money electronically to the IRA custodian. If the plan insists upon sending you a check,
make sure it’s made out to the IRA custodian. If it’s made out to you, you lose the ability to stretch out the withdrawals
over your life expectancy.
2) Don’t roll the money into your own IRA! It has to go into what’s known as a “beneficiary”
IRA, which means Uncle Ned’s name must still be on the account. The title should be along the lines of “Ned Smith’s IRA for
the benefit of Suzy Jones” or “Suzy Jones, beneficiary of Ned Smith’s IRA.”
2a) Don’t comingle the money! By law, Uncle
Ned’s 401(k) account must go into its very own, new IRA. Don’t roll the money into an existing “beneficiary” IRA, such as
the IRA that was left to you by your grandfather!
3) As a non-spouse beneficiary, you must start withdrawing a minimum
amount of money from this inherited IRA by December 31st of the year after Uncle Ned died. If Uncle Ned’s year of death is
2007, you must take your first “required minimum distribution” (RMD) by December 31, 2008.
The amount you have to withdraw
is based on your own life expectancy. The younger you are, the smaller the RMD, which means more money remains in the IRA,
where its gains remain sheltered from taxes. (See example above.)
Since a retirement plan is not required to accommodate
a direct transfer on behalf of a non-spouse beneficiary until 2008, if the plan refuses your request and the account owner
died in 2006, you’re probably out of luck in terms of stretching out the withdrawals. (The money would have to be in the inherited
IRA this year so you can take your first RMD by Dec. 31st.)
However, anyone who inherits a retirement account this
year or later is guaranteed the option of having the money rolled into an IRA.
Here’s another little twist. If the
inherited account is rolled over to an IRA the same year the owner died, then 100% of the balance can be moved. The following
year (i.e. the “year after death”) you must take your first required withdrawal from the IRA by Dec. 31st.
However,
if the rollover doesn’t occur until the year after death, you’re supposed to take the first year’s required distribution from
the account and then roll the balance into the IRA.
Choate, author of Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits,
says in the case of a year-after-death rollover the burden falls on the retirement plan. “To maintain its qualification, the
plan must pay out the RMD before making the rollover.”
This sounds complicated, but it really isn’t. All you have
to remember is that if you inherit a company-sponsored retirement account from someone who you are not married to, you have
an opportunity to roll over the money to an IRA and turn it into a windfall.
Hope this helps,
Gail
(1) Notice
2007-7, which came out in January, was so convoluted it was followed by a clarification the next month!
If you have a question for Gail Buckner and the Your $ Matters column, send them to: yourmoneymatters@gmail.com
Market Snapshot
| Symbol | Last Price | Netchange | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |
| -- | -- | -- | -- |



