FOX Translator

Detach

No data currently available.

No data currently available.

SYMBOL

 
Dividends

You know that buying a stock makes you part owner of a company, theoretically with millions of other people. But, while ownership has its privileges (at minimum you get a neat stock certificate and an invitation to the annual meeting), being an owner doesn't necessarily pay. Sure, you make money if the stock goes up, but only if you sell, and you can, in theory, lose all the value of your investment if the stock tanks.

Enter the dividend. Here, you get money simply from holding the stock. Companies pay a yield, which is expressed in a percentage based on the stock's price. For example, if a stock trades at $10, and pays a 10% annual yield, your dividend payment would be a $1. (Usually, companies break out the payments quarterly, so, using our example, you¿d get, well, a quarter each quarter.)

Companies that pay dividends fall into a few categories. First, you've got your big, stable companies that generate enough cash that it makes sense to throw some back to shareholders. Next, there are businesses, like real estate investment trusts, that are in the business of sitting back and receiving cash, then distributing it to holders. And, then there are companies that need to dangle a high dividend yield like a carrot to ease investor fears. Cigarette-maker Altria has been doing this for years.

Simply because a company pays a dividend doesn't make it a good investment. After all, you may want to take a chance on a growth stock that can move higher in price than dividend payers are known to do. But, you can¿t beat the safety of knowing that, even if a stock doesn't move in a year, you¿re at least making something off your investment.

Home

AJC Applauds Court Decision to Keep AIPAC Trial Open

 
Comtex
 

NEW YORK, June 20, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ ----The American Jewish Committee (AJC) applauded the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling today upholding the decision of Judge Thomas Ellis III to keep the trial of two former AIPAC staff open to the public.

"We are delighted with the decision because closing this trial in any way will shroud the government's case in a veil of secrecy," said AJC Executive Director David Harris. "The defendants and the public deserve to know the truth."

Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman were indicted in 2005, accused of illegally passing on classified information in violation of the 1917 Espionage Act. That statute has never been used to prosecute private citizens.

AJC has previously expressed concern about the ongoing delays in the prosecution of this case and the impact on the defendants' constitutional rights.

"We eagerly await a fair and expeditious resolution of this matter," said Harris.

SOURCE American Jewish Committee

http://www.ajc.org 
Copyright
   (C) 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved
 

Market Snapshot

Symbol Last Price Netchange Volume
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --
-- -- -- --