Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Economist: Stimulus Helped Consumer Spending

Title:

Economist: Stimulus Helped Consumer Spending

Published: Tue, 3 Nov 2009

Description: Brookings Institution Senior Fellow Gary Burtless on the benefits of the economic stimulus.

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" all the debate on how many jobs this stimulus package has created what about just the broader economy. Has this stimulus really pulled us out of a recession. According to our next -- some aspects of the stimulus can be called a success joining us is Gary. Bartlett senior fellow at the Brookings institute and Gary talked about the tax cut component of the stimulus packages that really. The only part of it it is really working in your opinion. I think."

" That there's two parts that are working one is. Raising the disposable incomes of American households. Through tax cuts and through benefit increases in the unemployment insurance programs Social Security food stamps. Health insurance for the unemployed. All of those forms. Stimulus spending are helping to hold -- Consumer Spending. One thing that's people talk about is how weak Consumer Spending is the try to imagine how bad it would be. Given how much the wealth American households has fallen and how much their private incomes have song the other part of the stimulus that I think is working. Is all of the money that the federal government is providing to state and locals so that they can maintain their employment. Or. Fails -- fail to raise taxes. To cut their budget deficit so the federal. Transfers to state governments are plugging a huge hole and -- state. Balance sheets."

" Well that's good for the states carries Brian Sullivan is that necessarily keynesian no I mean. Ironically something like food stamps is probably the most wonder watery than better than 121 investment right for every dollar write again did you give somebody. In food stamps they'll spend or about 73. Will go through the system that's a good investment. Overall though are things like filling budget gaps and other projects. Are they good investments because we grew at a 112 billion dollar output from twelve to QD three Q but stimulus was spent a 173 billion indicating to me and never return of only 65 --"

" Well. Look some of the money that is going to you and I in the form of a smaller where holdings from our. Weekly paycheck. Is probably being used by you and I -- Take down our credit card bills or -- to -- bank savings accounts are not all of them the money that goes is tax cuts is immediately. Used to buy things and that. Boost Consumer Spending but a lot of the money that's going to state government site I think you have to be clear on this is preventing. What would otherwise be even bigger cuts. For example higher education spending in K through twelve spending and state Health Department spending in state -- capital. Spending on roads and so on so. I I agree with you that the money that goes to the long term unemployed in the form of unemployment benefits and to indigent families in food stamps. Is translated. Into higher Consumer Spending right away much much faster but let's not to forget that states like California. Would be laying off an awful lot of teachers and state employees were not for the fact the federal government. Has filled a huge. Sparingly and revenue gap -- California's budget. Thanking various good to save Gary Bartlett senior fellow at the Brookings Institution they well."

More Videos From FOX Business
Alexis Glick: Everyone's Picking on Goldman

Alexis Glick: Everyone's Picking on Goldman

FBN weighs in on the outrage surrounding Goldman Sachs and executive pay.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|goldman sachsfound at0:26

on my thoughts on this -- second. I understand the outreach about Goldman how much money they guide to whether or not being American taxpayers save them their relationship with the government. Isn't reason to be upset about some of that stuff I get it but the end of the day. Everybody is picking on Goldman Sachs wouldn't shareholders . Are telling what are the most successful companies. On the planet. What they think they should get paid. Things have gone too
Patent Protection Hits Highest Court

Patent Protection Hits Highest Court

Attorney Michael Jakes on why he took patent protection to the Supreme Court.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|warsawfound at0:50

But as you as you say it's exactly that. These two inventors Warsaw on bills he came up with a great idea for hedging. The commodity risks in the energy market and to provide consumers with a fixed bill they applied for a patent back in 1997. But they've been shut out of the door they haven't been able to have their patent examiner on the merits. Because the Court of Appeals has said it's not the right kind of invention it doesn't. It's not tied to a machine or transform particular subject matter that's the issue we took to the Supreme Court
Nip, Tuck and Tax

Nip, Tuck and Tax

Facial Plastic Surgeon Dr. Daniel Rousso on taxing Botox and cosmetic surgery.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|botox injectionsfound at0:19, 1:48, 2:52

to mention some details here about how much. Four point seven million Botox injections last year average cost per visit about 400 bucks it's about one point eight. Billion dollars if they tax. These Botox injections and they're talking about taxing other things like breast implants and tummy tucks. Do you think there will be fewer of these
tax on the middle class could it. It's it's often portrayed he's Botox injections as something that just the wealthy use. Is that your experience.
looking to tax something it's going to be the elective stuff like Botox injections .