Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Cap and Trade Still a Hot Topic?

Title:

Cap and Trade Still a Hot Topic?

Published: Tue, 27 Oct 2009

Description: The National Taxpayers Union's Pete Sepp breaks down the cost of cap and trade.

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" Let's bring yet another voice on the cost of cap and trade Pete -- he is the president. By -- unity I'm sure you just terrible -- bonds have to say that. One point two trillion dollars that the overall cost I'm not sure what the timeframe for that is can you add to that cost analysis that."

" It looks like a ten year time frame from implementation forward and implementation really wouldn't occur closer to 32. Rather than next year the year after if it were even an active right now. But one point two trillion should be regarded as the war rather than -- ceiling for cost because. Many of the government's estimates vary. Depending on what they count. As certain Peter -- one point two trillion as the cost of the permits not necessarily. The costs that businesses will have to absorb in the form of laying off workers raising prices etc. To cope with the new emissions caps also. There may be exemptions for small firms emitting CO2. In the boxer Kerry bill. But the findings of the bill a centrally create a legal action. And -- environmental groups in the white could end up suing small firms saying that even though you're not covered under the limits because you're exempt you're still creating a public health danger. And EPA administrator gets involved in that respect. And you could very well see very tiny firms getting regulated under this bill to -- upon."

" Two of the president's. Speaking this morning he's not looking at the cost in fact he's not mention the cost he would -- if you criticize this cap and trade. The video simply standing in the way you off fighting change. So that they're not putting cost in the picture -- go back that one point two trillion dollar figure. That's not going to be government spending is it that's not no it won't add to the deficit. That is the cost imposed on businesses and consumers. And homeowners. By this cap and trade legislation but all that right."

" Yes and in fact the government hopes to make money off cap and trade by getting that -- whenever these permits are traded in fact the US treasury. Said that. As much as 200 billion dollars a year could flow into the US treasury if this permit trading goes the way it's predicted. Now somewhat say hey that's a great way of lowering the deficit while we would look at it is yet more money for the federal government to play weapon squander."

" I have to say that you're you know you opened up a pandora's box that because I'm not realize that environmental groups could indeed. Sue with small businesses on the grounds that okay you've got exemption but you're still emitting CO2 as you still endangering the planet. Pay -- I did not realize that that -- opening a pandora's box that really is yes so findings languages really really touchy. Oh yes and it just so thank you very much and -- debating whether we appreciate your input got my."

More Videos From FOX Business
Alexis Glick: Everyone's Picking on Goldman

Alexis Glick: Everyone's Picking on Goldman

FBN weighs in on the outrage surrounding Goldman Sachs and executive pay.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|goldman sachsfound at0:26

on my thoughts on this -- second. I understand the outreach about Goldman how much money they guide to whether or not being American taxpayers save them their relationship with the government. Isn't reason to be upset about some of that stuff I get it but the end of the day. Everybody is picking on Goldman Sachs wouldn't shareholders . Are telling what are the most successful companies. On the planet. What they think they should get paid. Things have gone too
Patent Protection Hits Highest Court

Patent Protection Hits Highest Court

Attorney Michael Jakes on why he took patent protection to the Supreme Court.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|warsawfound at0:50

But as you as you say it's exactly that. These two inventors Warsaw on bills he came up with a great idea for hedging. The commodity risks in the energy market and to provide consumers with a fixed bill they applied for a patent back in 1997. But they've been shut out of the door they haven't been able to have their patent examiner on the merits. Because the Court of Appeals has said it's not the right kind of invention it doesn't. It's not tied to a machine or transform particular subject matter that's the issue we took to the Supreme Court
Nip, Tuck and Tax

Nip, Tuck and Tax

Facial Plastic Surgeon Dr. Daniel Rousso on taxing Botox and cosmetic surgery.

Video|Fri, 20 Nov 2009|More from FOX Business
|botox injectionsfound at0:19, 1:48, 2:52

to mention some details here about how much. Four point seven million Botox injections last year average cost per visit about 400 bucks it's about one point eight. Billion dollars if they tax. These Botox injections and they're talking about taxing other things like breast implants and tummy tucks. Do you think there will be fewer of these
tax on the middle class could it. It's it's often portrayed he's Botox injections as something that just the wealthy use. Is that your experience.
looking to tax something it's going to be the elective stuff like Botox injections .